Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:02:27.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

S25-03 - At Risk Mental State for Psychosis: Clinical Features and Natural Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

A. Riecher-Rössler
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
J. Aston
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
S. Borgwardt
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
U. Gschwandtner
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
M. Pflüger
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
R. Zimmermann
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Outpatient Department, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

Despite significant advances, early detection and intervention regarding psychosis still face major obstacles. The Basel FePsy-study tries to contribute to optimising the methods for assessment of risk for psychosis, by describing individuals in an At Risk Mental State (ARMS) with and without later transition to psychosis as compared to healthy (HC) and depressive controls (DC) and by using a multidomain approach including not only psychopathology and clinical risk factors, but also neuropsychology, neurophysiology and neuroimaging.

Methods

60 ARMS subjects, 51 HC and 34 DC were investigated. 53 ARMS individuals could be followed up for up to 7 years.

Results

21 ARMS individuals made the transition to psychosis (transition rate 34%). As compared to HC, they showed significant deficits in executive functions and working memory. Predictors of transition were certain attenuated psychotic and negative symptoms and certain cognitive deficits. In an integrated model for prediction of transition using these variables, the overall predictive accuracy was 80.9%, with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 79.3%. Specificity of prediction could be further improved by EEG analysis. Furthermore, MRI showed specific differences between ARMS with and without later transition to psychosis.

Conclusion

Individuals at risk for psychosis do not only show psychopathological prodromes and social decline, but also neuropsychological impairments and EEG- as well as MRI-abnormalities. Hopefully in the near future, a clinical staging of individuals according to their risk for psychosis will be possible with corresponding stepwise early interventions.

Type
Subjects at risk for schizophrenia: focus on clinical and neurobiological aspects
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.