No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2020
Violent and aggressive behavior in prison is considered to be a constant problem in most penal institutions and it not only poses a threat to prison staff and fellow inmates, but is also a source of additional cost. An early identification of inmates who tend towards violent or ag-gressive behavior in prison should therefore be a central goal, in order to both protect the staff and other inmates from becoming victims of violent actions and to lower the overall costs of the penal system. Furthermore in-prison behavior is suspected to be good predictor of legal probation after release to the community. There is an ongoing debate concerning the useful-ness of actuarial risk assessment instruments in predicting intramural violence as studies on their predictive validity show mixed results. In this study the predictive validity of PCL-R, PCL:SV and the VRAG for different types of prison misconduct (violent and verbally violent infractions) was examined on a sample of 106 violent and sex offenders of the largest Swiss state penitentiary.
The relationship between physical violence and PCL-R score was not significant but the sum score did predict the occurrence of verbal aggression. For the PCL:SV and the VRAG similar results were found as there were significant effect sizes for verbal aggressive behavior of sex-ual offenders but not for violent offenders.
These results highlight the need for further research on the usefulness of risk assessment instrument in the prediction of intramural violence.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.