No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2020
To determine whether a differential state specific intervention in the initial prodromal state is effective for preventing progression to psychosis.
128 patients in the early initial prodromal state (EIPS) were randomized to receive either a comprehensive cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) intervention or supportive counseling (SC) for 12 months. 124 patients in a putatively late initial prodromal state (LIPS) were randomly assigned to a needs-focused inter-vention (NFI) or to NFI plus amisulpride.
In the EIPS trial Kaplan-Meier estimates of the risks of transitions to LIPS (5.3% vs. 18.5%, p=0.032), psychosis (1.6% vs. 13.8%, p=0.020) and schizophrenia (none vs. 13.8%, p=0.005) at month 12 were statistically significant lower in the CBT group than in the SC group. In the LIPS trial Amisul-pride+NFI produced superior effects to NFI alone on attenuated and full-blown psychotic symptoms, basic, depressive and negative symptoms and global functioning at week 12.
First results indicate that a differential intervention to the initial prodromal state is effective for preventing progression to psychosis.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.