Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:37:03.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research with incompetent demented patients. A current problem in light of German history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

H Helmchen
H Helmchen*
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik der Freien Universitdt Berlin, Universitdtsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Eschenallee 3, D-14050, Germany
Get access

Summary

Medical research with incompetent patients which is expected to yield only questionable or no individual benefit (and which is often wrongly equated with non-therapeutic research) remains a difficult and controversial problem. This is reflected in the fact that such research is legally admissible in some countries such as France and England, but is questionable or prohibited in other countries, eg, Germany. Such research can only be justified ethically if the need for it is set forth according to defined criteria, and if defined protective criteria are fulfilled, particularly to ensure that the research-related instrumentalisation of the patient is held in check by observing respect for the patient's dignity, to ensure that research does not involve more than minimal risks and negligible stress for the individual participant, and that the patient's refusal to participate is accepted. A broad international consensus exists with regard to these criteria [9, 21, 26, 41]. But concepts and definitions as to what constitutes benefits and risks, as well as criteria and procedures in weighing benefits against risks, and, not least of all, the weighing of individual benefit against societal benefit, require clarification. The question must also be satisfactorily answered: who is to do the weighing? But above all, it must be ensured by professional education that this process of checks and controls is effectively carried out in day-to-day medical-scientific life.

Keywords

incapacity to consentdementia researchethical rulesNational Socialist crimes
Type
Research Article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 13 , Issue S3 , 1998 , pp. 93s - 100s
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berufsordnung. Amtsblatt für Berlin.Ärztekammer Berlin 14 September 1990Google Scholar
Altenbeckum, J“Nazismus mit umgekehrtem Gedankengang” in Schweden Frankf Allg Z 2 September 1997Google Scholar
Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JFPrinciples of biomedical ethics 4th ed. 1994 University Press ParisGoogle Scholar
Beecher, KKEthics and clinical research New Engl J Med 1996, 274: 1354–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birley, JLTPolitical Abuse of Psychiatry GenevaGeneva Initiative OIC NL 10 July1997Google Scholar
Burleigh, MDeath and Deliverance. “Euthanasia in Germany c. 1900–1945 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994Google Scholar
Dörner, KTödliches Mitleid Zur Frage der Unerträglichkeit des Lebens oder: die soziale Frage: Entstehung, Medizinisierung, NS-Lösung, heute, morgen Gütersloh: Verlag Jakob von Hoddis;, 1988Google Scholar
Dörner, KWenn Ärzte nur das Beste wollen Nuremberg: IPPNWCongress “Medizin und Gewissen” 25–27 October 1996Google Scholar
Dresser, RMentally Disabled Research Subjects. The Enduring Policy Issues, J Am Med Ass 1996; 276: 67–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erhardt, HEuthanasie und Vernichtung “lebensunwerten” Lebens Stuttgart: Enke, 1965Google Scholar
Faden, RThe human radiation experiments New York: Oxford University Press, 1996Google ScholarPubMed
Fagot-Largeault, ANational Report France In Koch, HGReiter-Theil, SHelmchen, HInformed Consent in Psychiatry Baden-Baden: Nomos 1996 67–96Google Scholar
Finzen, AMassenmord ohne Schuldgefühl Bonn: Edition Das Narrenschiff im Psychiatrie-Verlag, 1996Google Scholar
Fuchs, T, Lauter, HDer Fall Chabot: Assistierter Suizid aus psychiatrischer Sicht, Nervenarzt 1997; 68: 878–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groeben, NWie wares möglich? Zur psychologischen Erklärbarkeit von Menschenversuchen im Dritten Reich In Hohendorf, GMagullseltenreich, AVon der Heilkunde zur Massentötung — Medizin im Nationalsozialismus Windershom Heidelberg 1990 203–228Google Scholar
Griffiths, JAssisted Suicide in the Netherlands: The Chabot Case, Modern Law Rev 1995 58/2 232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotjahn, ASoziale Pathologie Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1912Google Scholar
Hanuske-Abel, HMNot a slippery slope or sudden subversion: German medicine and National Socialism in 1933, Brit Med J 1996; 313: 1453–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmchen, HEthische Fragen in der Psychiatri In Kisker, et al Psychiatrie der Gegenwart vol 2 3rd ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1996, 321–361Google Scholar
Helmchen, HForschung mit nicht-einwilligungsfähigen Kranken, Berichte und Abhandlungen der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1998, 5: 9–30Google Scholar
Helmchen, HThe mutual patient-psychiatrist communication and the therapy contract, Compreh Psychiatry 1998; 39: 5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmchen, HLauter, HDürfen Ärzte mit Demenzkranken forschen? Analyse des Problemfeldes Forschungsbedarf und Einwilligungsproblematik Stuttgart: Thieme, 1995Google Scholar
Helmchen, H, Vollmann, J. Ethische Fragen in der Psychiatrie In: Helmchen, H, Henn, FA, Lauter, H, Sartorius, N, eds. Psychiatrie der Gegenwart, vol II, 4th ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer (in press)Google Scholar
Hohendorf, G, Roeicke, V, Rotzoll, MInnovation und Vernichtung — Psychiatrische Forschung und “Euthanasie” an der Heidelberger Psychiatrischen Klinik 1939–1945, Nervenarzt 1996; 67: 935–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohendorf, G, Roeicke, V, Rotzoll, M. Von der Ethik des wissenschaftlichen Zugriffs auf den Menschen: die Verknüpfung von psychiatrischen Forschung und “Euthanasie” im Nationalsozialismus und einige Implikationen für die heutige Diskussion in der medizinischen Ethik. Beiträge zur NS-Gesundheits-und Sozialpolitik(in press)Google Scholar
Keyserlingk, EW, Glass, K, Kogan, S, Gauthier, SProposed Guidelines for the Participation of Persons with Dementia as Research Subjects, Perspectives Biol Med 1995 38/2 319–361Google Scholar
Klee, EAuschwitz, die NS-Medizin und ihre Opfer Fischer: Frankfurt/Main, 1997Google Scholar
Lauter, H, Meyer, JEDie neue Euthanasie-Diskussion aus psychiatrischerSicht, FortschrNeurol Psychiatrie 1992; 60: 441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhardt, L, Foerster, K, Hermann, FHoffman, 1891–1944—Die Tübinger Psychiatrie auf dem Weg in den Nationalsozialismus, Nervenarzt 1992; 67: 947–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, RJProposed Regulation for Research Involving Those Institutionalized as Mentally Infirm: A Consideration of Their Relevance IRB 1996 18/5 1–5Google Scholar
Maisch, HPatiententotungen — dem Sterben nachgeholfen München: Kindler, 1997Google Scholar
Meijers, LCMCommittee “Medical Experiments with Incapacitated Persons” to the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sport and the Ministry of Justice The Hague: The Committee, 1995Google Scholar
Meyer-Lindenberg, JThe Holocaust and German Psychiatry, Brit J Psychiatry 1991; 159: 7–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitscherlich, A, Mielke, FDas Diktat der MenschenverachtungHeidelberg1947Google Scholar
Mitscherlich, A, Mielke, FMedizin ohne Menschlickeit. Dokumente des Nümberger Ärzteprozesses 1960 Frankfurt/Main The HagueGoogle Scholar
Nagel, EHistorische Erfahrungen und ärztliches Handeln: Ethische Verpflichtungen bei Therapie und Forschung am Menschen, Dt Ärztebl:99th German Physicians Congress5 June1996Google Scholar
Rössler, DZur Diskussion über die Bioethik-Konvention Ethik Med 1996 8 167–172Google Scholar
Schmidt, GSelektion in der Heilanstalt 1939–1945 Stuttgart: Evangelisches Verlagswerk, 1965Google Scholar
Taupitz, J, Fröhlich, UMedizinische Forschung mit nicht-einwilligungsfähigen Personen, VersR 1977; 22: 911–918Google Scholar
The Law Commission Mentally incapacitated adults and decision making: medical treatment and research, a consultation paper no. 129 1993 HSMO LondonGoogle Scholar
The Law Commission Mental Incapacity: HC Paper 189 HSMO London 1995Google Scholar
Vollmann, J, Winau, RInformed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg Code, Brit Med J 1996; 313: 1445–1448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, FDie Euthanasie und die Heiligkeit des Lebens. Die Lebensvernichtung im Dienste der Medizin und Eugenik nach christlicher und monistischer Ethik München: Mas Hueber, 1948Google Scholar
Zentrale Ethikkommission, Stellungnahme “Zum Schutz nichteinwilligungsfähiger Personen in der medizinischen Forschung”, Dt Arztebl 1997; 94: A1911–A1912Google Scholar
Zentrale Ethikkommission Stellungnahme, Dt Arztebl 1997, 94: B2194–B2196Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.