Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:53:45.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality of life in depression scale (QLDS). Development, reliability, validity, responsiveness and application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

H Tuynman-Qua
Affiliation:
Eli Lilly Nederland, Krijtwal 17-23, 3432-2TNieuwegein
F de Jonghe
Affiliation:
Psychiatrisch Ziekenhuis Amsterdam. De Boeleaar 8, 1083Amsterdam, the Netherlands
S.P. McKenna
Affiliation:
Galen Research, Enterprise House, Manchester Science Park, Lioyd Street North, ManchesterMl5 65E, UK
Get access

Summary

The joint development of the Dutch and English versions of the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) is described. The QLDS is based on the needs model of quality of life developed by Hunt and McKenna. The scale has good reliability and internal consistency. Test-retest correlation coefficients were 0.94 and 0.87 in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, respectively. Internal consistency alpha-coefficients were 0.95 and 0.92, respectively. The validity of the scale is highly acceptable. The QLDS was shown to correlate relatively highly with established measures of well-being, and scores obtained with the measure were related to severity of depression as assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The QLDS was shown to be responsive to change in an open study with fluoxetine in 540 patients with major depression. The scale has wide applicability and has been shown to be user-friendly, both for respondents and administrators. It has been, or is in the process of being, tested for reliability and validity in the following additional countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Morocco, Spain and the United States.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grégoire, Jde Leval, NMesters, PCzarka, MValidation of the quality of life in depression scale in a population of adult depressive patients aged 60 and above Quality of Life Res 3 1994 1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, SMMcKenna, S.P.The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression Health Policy 22 1992 30731910.1016/0168-8510(92)90004-UCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, S.P.Hunt, SMA new measure of quality of life in depression. Testing the reliability and construct validity Health Policy 22 1992 321330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuynman-Qua, HJonghe, F deMcKenna, SHunt, SQuality of Life in Depression Rating Scale 1992 Houten Ibero55Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.