Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:49:00.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public attitudes towards mental patients: a comparison between Novosibirsk, Bratislava and German cities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Georg Schomerus ,
Herbert Matschinger ,
Denis Kenzin ,
Peter Breier  and
Matthias C. Angermeyer
Georg Schomerus*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Germany
Herbert Matschinger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Germany
Denis Kenzin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Germany
Peter Breier
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Ruzinov, Slovak Republic
Matthias C. Angermeyer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Johannisallee 20, D-04317 Leipzig, Germany. E-mail address: [email protected] (G. Schomerus).
Get access

Abstract

Purpose

– It is commonly assumed that reforms in the sector of psychiatric care have contributed to reducing the stigma attached to mental illness. In order to examine whether a relation between the psychiatric care set-up and stigmatisation of the patients exists we compared public attitudes towards mental patients in three countries at differing stages of progress in psychiatric reform.

Methods

– Population surveys on public attitudes towards mental patients were conducted in Novosibirsk (Russia) and Bratislava (Slovakia). The data were compared with those from a population survey that had recently been carried out in Germany. In all three surveys the same sampling procedure and fully structured interview were used. Public attitude towards mental patients was elicited using a perceived devaluation-discrimination measure.

Results

– Psychiatric patients face considerable rejection in all three locations in question. Overall, the degree of perceived devaluation and discrimination was similar in all countries with a significant, but marginal tendency towards stronger devaluation of mental patients in Germany.

Conclusion

– Our results do not support a strong relationship between psychiatric reform and mental illness stigma.

Keywords

Cross-cultural comparisonMental disordersAttitudeDeinstitutionalisation
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 21 , Issue 7 , October 2006 , pp. 436 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier SAS 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angermeyer, M.C., Buyantugs, L., Kenzine, D.V., Matschinger, H.Effects of labelling on public attitudes towards people with schizophrenia: are there cultural differences? Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 109(6)2004 420–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angermeyer, M.C., Matschinger, H.Public beliefs about schizophrenia and depression: similarities and differences Soc. Psych. Psych. Epid. 38(9)2003 526–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angermeyer, M.C., Matschinger, H.The stigma of mental illness in Germany: a trend analysis Int. J. Soc. Psychiatr. 51(3)2005 276–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angermeyer, M.C., Matschinger, H., Corrigan, P.W.Familiarity with mental illness and social distance from people with schizophrenia and major depression: testing a model using data from a representative population survey Schizophr. Res. 69(2–3)2004 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M., Kunze, H., von Cranach, M., Fritze, J., Becker, T.Psychiatric reform in Germany Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2001; 104:27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, S., Beck, M., Bujantugs, B., Kenzine, D., Matschinger, H., Angermeyer, M.C.The relationship between public causal beliefs and social distance toward mentally ill people Aust. NZ J. Psychiat. 38(5)2004 348–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabler, S, Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, JHP. Stichproben in der Umfragepraxis. [Samples in survey practice]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag;1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifi, A.Non-linear Multivariate Analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 1990.Google Scholar
Kurihara, T., Kato, M., Sakamoto, S., Reverger, R., Kitamura, T.Public attitudes towards the mentally ill: a cross-cultural study between Bali and Tokyo Psychiat. Clin. Neuros. 54(5)2000 547–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leucht, S., Pitschel-Walz, G., Abraham, D., Kissling, W.Efficacy and extrapyramidal side-effects of the new antipsychotics olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and sertindole compared to conventional antipsychotics and placebo. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Schizophr. Res. 35(1)1999 51–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Link, B.G.Understanding labeling effects in the area of mental-disorders–an assessment of the effects of expectations of rejection Am. Sociol. Rev. 52(1)1987 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, B.G., Yang, L.H., Phelan, J.C., Collins, P.Y.Measuring mental illness stigma Schizophr. Bull. 30(3)2004 511–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markowitz, F.E.The effects of stigma on the psychological well-being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness J. Health Soc. Behav. 39(4)1998 335–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matschinger, H., Angermeyer, M.C., Link, B.G.Variation of response pattern according to personal involvement–a methodological study using the discrimination-devaluation-scale Psychother. Psych. Med. 41(7)1991 278–283.Google Scholar
McDaid, D., Thornicroft, G.Policy brief mental health II. Balancing institutional and community based care. European observatory on health systems and policies Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2005.Google Scholar
Ojanen, M.Attitudes towards mental patients Int. J. Soc. Psychiatr. 38(2)1992 120–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poloshij, B., Saposhnikova, I.Psychiatric reform in Russia Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2001; 104:56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfield, S.Labeling mental illness: the effects of received services and perceived stigma on life satisfaction Am. Sociol. Rev. 62(4)1997 660–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rössler, W., Salize, H.J., Voges, B.Does community-based care have an effect on public-attitudes toward the mentally-Ill Eur. Psychiat. 10(6)1995 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartorius, N., Kuyken, W.Translation of health status instruments. Orley, J., Kuyken, W.Quality of life assessment: international perspectives Berlin: Springer; 1994. 2–8.Google Scholar
WHO Regional Office for Europe. European health for all database. http://www.data.euro.who.int/hfadb/ (accessed 26-9-2005); 2005.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.