Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T18:27:18.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychopathology and global functioning in schizophrenic patients on depot antypsychotics and long-acting injectable risperidone: A six month comparative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A. Intxausti
Affiliation:
La Candelaria University Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain
A.L. Morera
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Dermatology and Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain
C.C. González-Hernández
Affiliation:
La Vera Outpatient Mental Health Centre, Puerto de La Cruz, Tenerife, Spain
D. Alonso-Diaz
Affiliation:
La Vera Outpatient Mental Health Centre, Puerto de La Cruz, Tenerife, Spain
N. González-Brito
Affiliation:
La Vera Outpatient Mental Health Centre, Puerto de La Cruz, Tenerife, Spain
D. Hernández-García
Affiliation:
La Candelaria University Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain
M. Henry
Affiliation:
Service of Psychiatry, University Hospital of The Canary Islands, Canary Islands, Spain
A. Orozco
Affiliation:
Service of Psychiatry, University Hospital of The Canary Islands, Canary Islands, Spain
E. Díaz-Mesa
Affiliation:
La Candelaria University Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain
E. de Diego-Herrero
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The introduction of the first atypical antipsychotic with a long acting formulation has open new therapeutic options for the treatment of schizophrenic patients. Our objective consists of comparing psychopathology levels and global functioning in patients with paranoid schizophrenia treated in monotherapy either with long-acting injectable risperidone (LAIR) or conventional depot antipsychotics (DA).

Methods:

Patients attending at the community mental health center during the six-month recruitment period were eligible to enter the study. Scores achieved in positive and negative subscales of PANNS and EEAG scale of (Global Activity Evaluating Scale) were evaluated at baseline and 6 months later. Six patients treated with RLAI and six patients treated with DA were recruited. Data were analyzed both with the real sample (N=6 per group) and extrapoling the same results to a bigger sample size (N=24 per group).

Results:

Mean increase in scores for both PANNS positive and negative subscales were lower in patients treated with RLAI that in those treated with DA (positive subscale: 0.018±0.06 vs. 0.048±0.03, RLAI and DA, respectively, p=0.387; negative subscale: 0.232±0.076 vs. 0.3095±0.123, RLAI and DA, respectively, p=0.579). EEAG scores were higher for patients treated with RLAI than those treated with DA (1.250±0.56 vs. 0.333±0.225, p=0.144). When these results are extrapolated to a sample of 24 patients per group, differences in EEAG reach statistical significance (p=0.034).

Conclusions:

After 6 months of treatment, patients treated with RLAI tend to show a greater improvement in their global activity than those treated with DA.

Type
Poster Session 1: Schizophrenia and Other Psychosis
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.