Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:44:13.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

C. Barkmann
Affiliation:
Child Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
M. Erhart
Affiliation:
Child Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
M. Schulte-Markwort
Affiliation:
Child Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
N. Wille
Affiliation:
Child Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
U. Ravens-Sieberer
Affiliation:
Child Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

To examine the psychometric properties and test-theoretical quality of the German version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC), a 20 items comprising screening instrument which measures the frequency of parent- and self-reported depressive symptoms in children and adolescents.

Methods:

Using a population-based, representative sample of N=2.863 7 to 17 year old German children and adolescents, factorial validity by means of linear structural modelling, cross-sectional coefficients of reliability, inter-rater agreement and normative scores are determined.

Results:

In a population-based German sample, the 4-factor version of the CES-DC following Radloff (1977) is considered to have good factorial validity and stability across age and informant version. The main problems of the questionnaire are the high difficulties of the items, strong floor effects of the scales and low cross-sectional reliability, which is just acceptable for screening purposes. The low inter-rater agreement indicate that parental assessment can replace self-assessment only to a limited degree.

Conclusion:

The strengths and weaknesses of the CES-DC are discussed taking into consideration previous data and comparable tests. Particular advantages are the existence of the parent report form and the adult version, as well as its multifactorial structure. Parental assessment should be supplemented by self-report data whenever possible.

Type
P01-223
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.