Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:15:51.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PS01-02 - Ethical Issues Related To Coercive Measures In Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

G. Szmukler*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I will examine a range of ‘treatment pressures’ in mental health care exerted on patients who are reluctant to accept treatment. Conceptual distinctions of moral relevance can be drawn between a number of interventions commonly termed 'coercive'. These include ‘compulsion’, ‘coercion’ (narrowly defined), ‘exploitation’, ‘deception’, ‘inducements’ (or offers), and ‘interpersonal leverage’. These pressures may be placed on a rough hierarchy of moral seriousness.

Justifications for coercive interventions will be briefly discussed and I will recommend a ‘capacity-best interests’ framework as applicable across the whole range of interventions.

Measures that may reduce the need for ‘coercion’ will be briefly discussed, the most promising being certain types of ‘advance statement’ which, among other effects, enhance patients' involvement in their treatment.

Type
Ethical issues of Psychiatric Treatment in Europe
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.