Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:40:24.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of autistic traits and their relationships with other psychopathological domains in young adults seeking psychiatric attention: a cluster analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Benedetta Demartini
Affiliation:
Unità di Psichiatria 51-52, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy “Aldo Ravelli” Research Centre for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Gianmarco Ingrosso*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Francesca Serio
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Veronica Nisticò
Affiliation:
“Aldo Ravelli” Research Centre for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
Giovanni Broglia
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Angelo Bertani
Affiliation:
Centro Giovani “Ettore Ponti”, Mental Health and Dependences Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
Raffaella Faggioli
Affiliation:
Unità di Psichiatria 51-52, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
Orsola Gambini
Affiliation:
Unità di Psichiatria 51-52, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy “Aldo Ravelli” Research Centre for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Gabriele Massimetti
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa 56127, Italy
Liliana Dell’Osso
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa 56127, Italy
Barbara Carpita
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa 56127, Italy
*
Corresponding author: Gianmarco Ingrosso; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Nearly two-thirds of individuals with a mental disorder start experiencing symptoms during adolescence or early adulthood, and the onset of a mental disorder during this critical life stage strongly predicts adverse socioeconomic and health outcomes. Subthreshold manifestations of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), also called autistic traits (ATs), are known to be associated with a higher vulnerability to the development of other psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to assess the presence of ATs in a population of young adults seeking specialist assistance and to evaluate the study population across various psychopathological domains in order to determine their links with ATs.

Methods

We recruited a sample of 263 adolescents and young adults referring to a specialized outpatient clinic, and we administered them several self-report questionnaires for the evaluation of various psychopathological domains. We conducted a cluster analysis based on the prevalence of ATs, empathy, and sensory sensitivity scores.

Results

The cluster analysis identified three distinct groups in the sample: an AT cluster (22.43%), an intermediate cluster (45.25%), and a no-AT cluster (32.32%). Moreover, subjects with higher ATs exhibited greater symptomatology across multiple domains, including mood, anxiety, eating disorder severity, psychotic symptoms, and personality traits such as detachment and vulnerable narcissism.

Conclusions

This study highlights the importance of identifying ATs in young individuals struggling with mental health concerns. Additionally, our findings underscore the necessity of adopting a dimensional approach to psychopathology to better understand the complex interplay of symptoms and facilitate tailored interventions.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association

Introduction

Despite substantial progress to date, mental illness continues to impose a significant burden on young individuals worldwide [Reference Mei, Fitzsimons, Allen, Alvarez‐Jimenez, Amminger and Browne1]. While most of the research has focused on the management of full-blown psychiatric syndromes in adult patients, early intervention and prevention have received comparatively less attention [Reference Fusar-Poli, Correll, Arango, Berk, Patel and Ioannidis2, Reference Uhlhaas, Davey, Mehta, Shah, Torous and Allen3]. Notably, nearly two-thirds of individuals with a mental disorder (62.5%) experience symptoms during adolescence or early adulthood (before the age of 25), with a median onset age of 18 [Reference Solmi, Radua, Olivola, Croce, Soardo and de Pablo4]. These life phases are pivotal for establishing the sociocultural and emotional foundations for the transition into adulthood, and prospective analyses indicate that the onset of a mental disorder during this critical life stage strongly predicts adverse socioeconomic and health outcomes [Reference Skinner, Occhipinti, Song and Hickie5].

From a neuropsychological point of view, research has also highlighted the concept of “sensitive periods,” that is, phases in which risk factors can influence the manifestation of mental health symptoms, thereby providing potential timeframes for early intervention [Reference Uhlhaas, Davey, Mehta, Shah, Torous and Allen3]. These considerations underscore the need to effectively address the mental health needs of young individuals, recognizing youth mental health as a distinct sector and prompting the development of services dedicated to early and preventive interventions [Reference Mei, Fitzsimons, Allen, Alvarez‐Jimenez, Amminger and Browne1].

Autistic traits and a dimensional approach to psychopathology

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by persistent deficits in social communication and interactions, restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors, and altered sensory sensitivity. ASDs often remain unrecognized until adulthood, coming to clinical attention after the onset of other mental disorders, often prompted by life stressors [Reference Kamio, Moriwaki, Takei, Inada, Inokuchi and Takahashi6, Reference Lundström7]. It is now recognized that autism features extend beyond those with a clinical diagnosis, existing on a continuum within the general population and manifesting at milder levels as subthreshold autistic characteristics [8, Reference Constantino and Charman9]. There is also evidence that, even when subthreshold, autistic traits (ATs) may be associated with a higher vulnerability to the development of other psychiatric disorders [Reference Dell’Osso, Carpita, Bertelloni, Diadema, Barberi and Gesi10Reference Takara and Kondo14].

Current psychopathological research has pointed out the shortcomings of a categorical approach to mental illnesses, emphasizing the limitations of the DSM-5 concept of “comorbidity.” This model is more suitable when there is homogeneity between members of a class, clear boundaries among different classes, and when the classes are mutually exclusive, circumstances that are rarely encountered in clinical practice. On the other hand, a dimensional approach to psychopathology allows the description of patients across multiple syndrome dimensions that, in turn, constitute broad spectra of interrelated psychopathologies [Reference Krueger and Piasecki15]. This approach is even more paramount in consideration of subthreshold symptomatic expression of psychopathology and calls for a novel diagnostic approach [Reference Uhlhaas, Davey, Mehta, Shah, Torous and Allen3].

In light of the aforementioned considerations, this study aimed to characterize the presence of ATs, using a cluster analysis, in a population of young adults seeking specialist assistance. Alongside, the study sought to assess the study population across various psychopathological domains (mood, anxiety, feeding and eating disorders [EDs], symptoms of the psychotic sphere, and personality structure), in order to evaluate their links with ATs.

Methods

Study population

The study included a sample of 263 adolescents and young adults aged 16 to 24 attending the “Centro Giovani Ettore Ponti” (ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy), an outpatient clinic open to individuals who are experiencing distress, discomfort, or psychopathological suffering, whether at the onset or already manifested in behaviors or symptomatic expressions of any kind.

Study participants underwent an evaluation by a psychiatrist and a psychologist according to DSM-5-TR criteria [8]. Specifically, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders: Clinical Version (SCID-5-CV) [Reference First, Williams, Karg and Spitzer16] was administered for the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders. The SCID-5-SPQ [Reference Ekselius, Lindström, von Knorring, Bodlund and Kullgren17] and the SCID-5-PD [Reference Shankman, Funkhouser, Klein, Davila, Lerner and Hee18] were used, respectively, for screening and diagnosis of personality disorders. Informed written consent was obtained from every participant after a complete description of the study and with the opportunity to ask questions. Subjects were not paid for their participation and were free to withdraw from the study at any time without giving further explanation.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of the ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo of Milan approved all recruitment and assessment procedures.

Psychometric instruments

In order to collect specific information for the study, the following self-report questionnaires were administered: (i) the Autism Quotient [Reference Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Skinner, Martin and Clubley19], designed to measure the extent to which an adult without intellectual disabilities exhibits ATs; (ii) the Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised, RAADS-R [Reference Ritvo, Ritvo, Guthrie, Ritvo, Hufnagel and McMahon20], usually implemented in clinical settings to support the diagnosis of ASDs without intellectual disabilities; (iii) the Empathy Quotient, EQ [Reference Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright21], to assess the level of cognitive and affective empathy; (iv) the Sensory Perception Quotient – Short Form, SPQ-SF35 [Reference Tavassoli, Hoekstra and Baron-Cohen22], which investigates hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity across the five sensory modalities (sight, hearing, smell, touch, and taste) and has demonstrated good discriminatory ability between adults with ASDs and neurotypical individuals; (v) the Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-II [Reference Beck, Steer and Brown23], for the evaluation of depressive symptoms; (vi) the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory [Reference Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg and Jacobs24], for measuring state anxiety, which is experienced in response to a situation (STAI-Y1), and trait anxiety (STAI-Y2), which is a part of personality; (vii) the Eating Attitude Test-26 items, EAT-26 [Reference Dotti and Lazzari25, Reference Garner, Olmsted, Bohr and Garfinkel26], for the assessment of the symptoms and specific concerns of EDs; (viii) the Prodromal Questionnaire–short version, PQ-16 [Reference Ising, Veling, Loewy, Rietveld, Rietdijk and Dragt27], for the identification of prodromal symptoms of psychosis; (ix) the Personality Inventory for DSM-5, PID-5-BF [Reference Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson and Skodol28], used to evaluate the personality structure according to the alternative dimensional model of the DSM-5; (x) the Pathological Narcissism Inventory, PNI [Reference Fossati and Borroni29, Reference Pincus, Ansell, Pimentel, Cain, Wright and Levy30], which investigates the levels of narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability. For each of the abovementioned scales, the validated Italian version was administered to the patients.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were calculated for all sociodemographic, clinical, and psychometric variables; in particular, we analyzed the frequencies of patients scoring above the cutoff on screening questionnaires. Statistical significance was defined at α < 0.05, and all tests performed were two-tailed. A K-means cluster analysis based on the standardized AQ, RAADS, EQ, and SPQ total scores was performed in order to evaluate the specific distribution of autism spectrum-related measures in distinct but homogeneous groups. We used squared Euclidean distance for the divergence measure between cases. The method of iterative updating of clustered centroids was chosen for classifying cases, with the new clusters’ centers being calculated after all cases are assigned to a given cluster. The solution for K = 3 (i.e., three clusters) was the most satisfactory with small within-cluster variability compared to the differences between the centroids of the clusters. Subsequently, we performed chi-square tests in order to compare categorical variables (gender, scores above or below BDI-II, STAI, EAT-26, and PQ-16 cutoffs) among clusters. In the case of gender and the presence/absence of a score above the cutoff at STAI-Y2, Fisher’s exact p-value was also reported as some cells showed an expected count lower than 5.

The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for comparing continuous variables (BDI-II, STAI, EAT-26, PQ-16, PID-5-BF, and PNI scores).

Finally, a discriminant analysis was carried out on the three cluster groups in order to confirm the results of the cluster analysis and to identify the weights of BDI-II, STAI, EAT-26, PNI, PID-5-BF, and PQ-16 scores in discriminating groups.

All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science, version 29.0 (SPSS Inc.).

Results

The mean age of our sample was 19.57 years (± 2.02). Most of the participants (158, 60.08%) identified themselves with the female gender, 88 subjects (33.46%) identified with the male gender, 12 (4.56%) declared themselves nonbinary, and 5 (1.90%) preferred not to disclose their gender. The average BMI was 22.60 kg/h2 (± 5.15): in particular, 49 (18.63%) participants were underweight (i.e., BMI below 18.5 kg/h2), 152 (57.78%) had a healthy weight (18.5 < BMI < 25 kg/h2), 41 (15.60%) participants were overweight (25 < BMI < 30 kg/h2), and 21 (7.99%) participants were obese (BMI above 30 kg/h2). Further sociodemographic information is reported in Table 1.

Table 1. Sociodemographic information

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; F, female; M, male; N, numerosity; SD, standard deviation; %, percentage.

The K-means cluster analysis met criterion 0 of convergence at the tenth iteration. The three clusters of subjects determined by the K-means cluster analysis were defined as AT cluster (n = 59, 22.43%), intermediate cluster (n = 119, 45.25%), and no-AT cluster (n = 85, 32.32%). Figure 1 shows the z-score values of AQ, RAADS, EQ, and SPQ total scores in the three clusters. The distance between AT and no-AT cluster centers was 4.021, the distance between AT and intermediate cluster centers was 2.196, and the distance between no-AT and intermediate cluster centers was 1.889. The average distance of cases from their cluster center was 1.239 ± 0.515. The dispersion analysis showed that AQ and RAADS scores were those with the greatest influence in forming clusters (F = 277.872 and F = 397.771, respectively) (Table 2).

Figure 1. Z-score values of AQ, RAADS, EQ, and SPQ total scores in the three clusters.

Table 2. Dispersion analysis for cluster analysis based on AQ, RAADS-r, EQ, and SPQ-SF35 total scores

Abbreviations: AQ, autism quotient; EQ, empathy quotient; RAADS-R, Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised; SE, standard error; SPQ-SF35, Sensory Perception Quotient Short Form.

A significant difference in gender distribution emerged for the clusters (chi-square = 32.012; p < .001, Fisher’s exact p < .001). Females were significantly more represented in the no-AT group (n = 65; 76.5%) than in AT (n = 31; 54.4%) and intermediate ones (n = 62; 53.4%). Males were significantly more represented in the intermediate group (n = 52; 44.8%) than in the no-AT one (n = 19; 22.4%), while an in-between proportion was reported in the AT group (n = 17; 29.8%). Nonbinary subjects were significantly more represented in the AT group (n = 9; 15.8%) than in the no-AT (n = 1; 1.2%) and intermediate (n = 2; 1.7%). Five subjects (2 in the AT group and 3 in the intermediate group) preferred to not disclose their gender.

According to the Kruskal–Wallis analysis, subjects in the no-AT cluster scored significantly lower than the AT cluster on BDI-II total scores (data available for 193 subjects), and STAI-Y2 (data available for 196 subjects) scores. Noticeably, for STAI-Y1, AT subjects also reported significantly higher scores than intermediate cluster participants, while for STAI-Y2, AT and intermediate cluster groups did not score significantly different, both reporting a significantly higher score than no-AT group (Table 3). No difference was reported in the proportion of subjects scoring above the BDI-II cutoff: AT group = 38 (90.5%), intermediate group = 72 (83.7%), and no-AT group = 49 (75.4%); chi-square = 4.195, p = .127. Similarly, no difference emerged in the proportion of subjects scoring above the STAI cutoffs, although a tendency toward significance is observable for STAI-Y2. STAI-Y1: AT group = 38 (92.7%), intermediate group = 74 (83.1%), and no-AT group = 52 (78.8%); chi-square = 3.607, p = .161. STAI-Y2: AT group = 40 (97.6%), intermediate group = 86 (96.6%), and no-AT group = 57 (87.7%); chi-square = 6.436, p = .049, Fisher’s exact p = .051.

Table 3. Comparison of BDI-II and STAI, EAT-26, PQ-16, PID-5-BF, and PNI scores among cluster groups

Abbreviations: AT, autistic trait; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory – Second Edition; EAT-26, Eating Attitude Test-26 items; PID-5-BF, Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief From; PNI, Pathological Narcissism Inventory; PQ-16, Prodromal Questionnaire Short Version; STAI-Y1, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory – State Anxiety; STAI-Y2, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory – Trait Anxiety.

Subjects in the AT cluster scored significantly higher than the other two on EAT-26 total and domain scores (Table 3), while for PQ-16 (data available for 198 subjects) the only significant difference was reported between AT and no-AT clusters, the latter scoring significantly lower than the first at both symptom and distress scores (Table 3). Moreover, the AT group reported a significantly higher proportion of subjects scoring above the cutoff of EAT-26 when compared with the other two groups: AT group = 24 (40.7%), intermediate group = 23 (19.3%), and no-AT group = 15 (17.6%); chi-square = 12.428, p = .002. The AT group also reported a significantly higher proportion of subjects scoring above the cutoff of PQ-16, only when compared with the no-AT group: AT group = 18 (40.0%), intermediate group = 21 (23.6%), and no-AT group = 9 (13.8%); chi-square = 9.962, p = .007.

Considering the PID-5 BF scale (data available for 181 subjects), AT subjects scored significantly higher than the other two clusters on the total score and on Detachment and Disinhibition factors, while for the Negative affect factor the AT cluster scored only higher than the no-AT one. For Psychoticism, AT subjects scored significantly higher than the other two clusters, while, in turn, the intermediate cluster scored higher than the no-AT one. No significant difference was found for the Antagonism factor (Table 3).

Finally, on PNI, AT and intermediate cluster groups scored significantly higher than the no-AT group on total scores; no significant differences were reported for Narcissistic grandiosity factor and for the subscales Exploitativeness, Self-sacrificing Self-enhancement, while AT and intermediate clusters scored higher than no-AT on Grandiose fantasy and Entitlement rage. On the other hand, AT group scored significantly higher than the intermediate cluster on Narcissistic vulnerability, which in turn scored higher than the no-AT one. In all the three subscales of Contingent Self-esteem, Hiding the self, and Devaluing, AT subjects scored higher than no-AT ones, while the intermediate cluster scored higher than the no-AT only on Contingent self-esteem and Devaluing (Table 3).

According to the discrimination analysis, two functions were identified: function 1 adsorbed most of the variance (85.9%), while function 2 absorbed 14.1% of the variance (Table 4 and Figure 2). The discriminating elements in function 1, in order of higher discriminant value, were PID-5-BF total, STAI-Y2 total, EAT-26 total, STAI-Y1 total, PQ-16 symptoms total, BDI-II total, and PNI Narcissistic vulnerability total. Function 2 was represented only by the PNI Narcissistic grandiosity total (Table 5).

Table 4. Summary of canonical discriminant functions for discriminant analysis

Figure 2. Discriminant analysis: group graphic.

Table 5. Structure matrix for discriminant analysis

* Largest absolute correlation between each variable and any discriminant function.

Discussion

The characterization of the sample based on the prevalence of ATs, empathy, and sensory sensitivity allowed the identification of three clusters of subjects, namely, a group in which ATs were highly prevalent (AT cluster), another in which such features were not present (no-AT cluster), and a subset of participants showing an intermediate pattern of AT expression (intermediate cluster). Of the aforementioned clinical and psychopathological features, the AT prevalence was the one driving the identification of the clusters.

Regarding sex distribution within clusters, and particularly the higher prevalence of female subjects in the no-AT cluster, our findings reflect the psychometric properties of the AQ and RAADS questionnaires. The AQ was originally validated in a predominantly male sample [Reference Allison, Auyeung and Baron-Cohen31], and though a potential specific female presentation of ASDs has emerged in literature [Reference Lai, Lombardo, Auyeung, Chakrabarti and Baron-Cohen32Reference Rynkiewicz, Lassalle, King, Smith, Mazur and Podgórska-Bednarz35], most psychometric scales for assessing ASDs are constructed on the classical phenotype of the disorder, thereby being more accurate in identifying male patients with ASDs [Reference Hull, Petrides and Mandy36Reference Rynkiewicz, Janas-Kozik and Słopień40]. Even though the prevalence of male subjects was higher in the intermediate cluster compared to the AT cluster, male subjects still comprise almost 50% of the intermediate cluster. This is even more relevant considering the overall female predominance of the total sample. The higher prevalence of nonbinary subjects in the AT cluster is consistent with existing literature on the distribution of ATs in both general and clinical populations [Reference Kung41]. For instance, another study has reported that transgender and gender-diverse individuals scored significantly higher on self-report measures of ATs compared to cisgender individuals [Reference Warrier, Greenberg, Weir, Buckingham, Smith and Lai42].

In the present study, individuals with a higher prevalence of ATs displayed overall greater symptomatology across various psychopathological dimensions, including mood, anxiety, severity of EDs, psychotic symptoms, and personality structure. This is in line with recent literature about the relationship between ATs and other psychiatric disorders [Reference Fietz, Valencia and Silani43, Reference Lundström, Chang, Kerekes, Gumpert, Råstam and Gillberg44].

In our sample, there was not a statistically significant difference between the clusters with regard to the number of subjects scoring above the cutoff at BDI-II and STAI-Y1/Y2 scales. Nonetheless, subjects in the intermediate and AT clusters exhibited statistically significant higher scores on both scales, thus indicating a higher level of overall affective symptomatology. Previous literature has already highlighted the relationship between ATs and affective disorders, namely, depression, either bipolar or unipolar [Reference Abu-Akel, Clark, Perry, Wood, Forty and Craddock45Reference Matsuo, Kamio, Takahashi, Ota, Teraishi and Hori48], and anxiety disorders [Reference Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Skinner, Martin and Clubley19, Reference Moss, Howlin, Savage, Bolton and Rutter49]. Moreover, studies have focused on the striking clinical similarities between ATs and social anxiety disorder (SAD) manifestations, such as social avoidance, difficulties being in public, and avoidance of eye contact [Reference Muris and Ollendick50Reference White, Ollendick and Bray52]. These shared features can sometimes make it difficult to adequately distinguish the two conditions in clinical practice [Reference Farrugia and Hudson53], also considering the well-researched frequent comorbidity between full-blown ASDs and SAD [Reference Cath, Ran, Smit, van Balkom and Comijs54Reference White, Oswald, Ollendick and Scahill57].

The same trend was observed for the scales assessing EDs symptoms and psychosis risk, wherein participants with higher ATs obtained higher scores compared to those in the intermediate and no-AT clusters. There is now a substantial body of literature highlighting the shared psychopathological features between ASDs and EDs (especially, but not exclusively, anorexia nervosa, AN). These include atypical social cognition, difficulties in processing emotions, cognitive rigidity [Reference Brede, Babb, Jones, Elliott, Zanker and Tchanturia58], and an impaired theory of mind [Reference Huke, Turk, Saeidi, Kent and Morgan59]. Furthermore, research indicates a higher prevalence of ATs in both AN [Reference Baron-Cohen, Jaffa, Davies, Auyeung, Allison and Wheelwright60Reference Tchanturia, Smith, Weineck, Fidanboylu, Kern and Treasure62] and other EDs [Reference Dell’Osso, Carpita, Gesi, Cremone, Corsi and Massimetti12, Reference Vagni, Moscone, Travaglione and Cotugno63].

As for psychotic spectrum disorders and ASDs, an increasing number of papers have pointed out the similarities in the clinical presentation of these conditions, as well as the higher prevalence of ATs in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and the comorbidity between these syndromes [Reference De Crescenzo, Postorino, Siracusano, Riccioni, Armando and Curatolo64, Reference van Os, Hanssen, Bijl and Strauss65]. Social withdrawal, theory of mind deficits, and cognitive dysfunctions represent shared symptomatologic features between these conditions, and a conspicuous number of studies have identified genetic, biological, and familial overlap between SSDs and ASDs [Reference Carroll and Owen66Reference Jutla, Foss-Feig and Veenstra-VanderWeele69]. Furthermore, an increased occurrence of schizophrenia has been observed in individuals with ASDs compared to controls [Reference Lai, Kassee, Besney, Bonato, Hull and Mandy70, Reference Zheng, Zheng and Zou71], and this is also true for subthreshold ASD conditions, which show high prevalence rates in psychotic populations [Reference Kincaid, Doris, Shannon and Mulholland72].

The higher scores obtained by AT subjects at the Detachment and Disinhibition domains of the PID-5-BF questionnaire reflect the clinical similarity between some features of ASDs (and ATs) and the anxious-avoidant psychopathological dimension, as noted in prior studies [Reference Carpita, Nardi, Bonelli, Massimetti, Amatori and Cremone73, Reference Dell’Osso, Amatori, Bonelli, Nardi, Massimetti and Cremone74]. Additionally, disinhibition is a commonly observed symptom in full-blown ASDs, and it is worth mentioning that ASDs are often comorbid with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and impulse control disorders [Reference Mannion, Brahm and Leader75Reference Vannucchi, Masi, Toni, Dell’Osso, Marazziti and Perugi77], which have all been classified among the so-called obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders [Reference Hollander, Kim, Khanna and Pallanti78]. On the other hand, the higher scores observed in the Negative Affect and Psychoticism domains mirror the aforementioned considerations about BDI-II, STAY, and PQ-16 results.

Regarding narcissistic traits, in our study participants with more ATs displayed a higher amount of narcissistic vulnerability. It is now recognized that individuals with vulnerable narcissism face an increased risk of developing mental health conditions. Specifically, the dimensions of hiding and underestimating the self seem to be associated with suicidal ideation and a high frequency of non-suicidal self-harm [Reference Sprio, Mirra, Madeddu, Lopez-Castroman, Blasco-Fontecilla and Di Pierro79]. The presence of greater vulnerable narcissism is also related to social avoidance, anxiety, and internalized depressive manifestations (low self-esteem and shame) [Reference Erkoreka and Navarro80, Reference Miller, Lamkin, Gentile, Lynam and Campbell81]. In line with these findings, our cohort consisted of young individuals seeking psychiatric assistance for various psychopathological concerns. Furthermore, it has been shown that a high prevalence of vulnerable, but not grandiose, narcissistic traits can be found among ASD patients [Reference Broglia, Nisticò, Di Paolo, Faggioli, Bertani and Gambini82], which recalls the definition of “naïve egocentrism” first postulated by Frith and colleagues referring to a certain self-absorption intrinsic to ASDs [Reference Frith and de Vignemont83].

Lastly, the results of our discrimination analysis hint at the possibility that ATs may predispose to an overall greater psychopathological burden. This is evidenced by the accurate separation of AT clusters by the scores obtained at the administered psychometric scales.

The findings of this study must be interpreted in light of the following limitations. First, reliance on self-report scales for data collection may introduce biases due to subjective perceptions and social desirability biases. Second, the available ASDs screening scales might not adequately capture the female phenotype of ASDs, possibly resulting in the oversight of female participants exhibiting ATs. Additionally, the absence of a control group limits the ability to compare the observed findings with those of individuals without psychopathological conditions. Third, we did not include in our analysis important variables such as family history and substance use, since they were not consistently disclosed by every subject during the first consultation; moreover, further statistical analyses such as a stratification of the results based on demographic variables (e.g., living environment) were not feasible due to the unequal distribution of participants across the living environment categories (i.e., most subjects lived with their family). Lastly, the cross-sectional nature of the study restricts the possibility of establishing causal relationships or tracking longitudinal changes in psychopathological symptoms over time.

In conclusion, this study highlights the high prevalence of ATs in a group of young individuals struggling with mental health concerns. Additionally, subjects exhibiting more ATs displayed an overall greater severity of psychiatric symptoms across various psychopathological domains, including mood, anxiety, EDs, psychotic symptoms, and personality structure. The findings also underscore the necessity of adopting a dimensional approach to psychopathology to better understand the complex interplay of symptoms and facilitate tailored interventions. Future studies with a larger sample, a longitudinal nature, and a control group may provide further insights into the relationship between ATs and other psychiatric disorders.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Competing interest

None.

Footnotes

B.D. and G.I. share first authorship.

References

Mei, C, Fitzsimons, J, Allen, N, Alvarez‐Jimenez, M, Amminger, GP, Browne, V, et al. Global research priorities for youth mental health. Early Interv Psychiatry 2020;14:313. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fusar-Poli, P, Correll, CU, Arango, C, Berk, M, Patel, V, Ioannidis, JPA. Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people. World Psychiatry Off J World Psychiatr Assoc WPA 2021;20:200–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20869.Google ScholarPubMed
Uhlhaas, PJ, Davey, CG, Mehta, UM, Shah, J, Torous, J, Allen, NB, et al. Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap. Mol Psychiatry 2023;28:3171–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02202-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solmi, M, Radua, J, Olivola, M, Croce, E, Soardo, L, de Pablo, G, et al. Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry 2022;27:281–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, A, Occhipinti, J-A, Song, YJC, Hickie, IB. Population-level effectiveness of alternative approaches to preventing mental disorders in adolescents and young adults. Sci Rep 2023;13:19982. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47322-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamio, Y, Moriwaki, A, Takei, R, Inada, N, Inokuchi, E, Takahashi, H, et al. [Psychiatric issues of children and adults with autism spectrum disorders who remain undiagnosed]. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi 2013;115:601–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Lundström, S. Autism spectrum disorders and Autisticlike Traits: similar etiology in the extreme end and the normal variation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012;69:46. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5-TR. American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2022.Google Scholar
Constantino, JN, Charman, T. Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: reconciling the syndrome, its diverse origins, and variation in expression. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:279–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00151-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell’Osso, L, Carpita, B, Bertelloni, CA, Diadema, E, Barberi, FM, Gesi, C, et al. Subthreshold autism spectrum in bipolar disorder: prevalence and clinical correlates. Psychiatry Res 2019;281:112605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell’Osso, L, Carpita, B, Muti, D, Morelli, V, Salarpi, G, Salerni, A, et al. Mood symptoms and suicidality across the autism spectrum. Compr Psychiatry 2019;91:34–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.03.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell’Osso, L, Carpita, B, Gesi, C, Cremone, IM, Corsi, M, Massimetti, E, et al. Subthreshold autism spectrum disorder in patients with eating disorders. Compr Psychiatry 2018;81:6672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.11.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato, K, Mikami, K, Akama, F, Yamada, K, Maehara, M, Kimoto, K, et al. Clinical features of suicide attempts in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013;35:50–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.09.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takara, K, Kondo, T. Comorbid atypical autistic traits as a potential risk factor for suicide attempts among adult depressed patients: a case–control study. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2014;13:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-014-0033-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, RF, Piasecki, TM. Toward a dimensional and psychometrically-informed approach to conceptualizing psychopathology. Behav Res Ther 2002;40:485–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00016-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First, MB, Williams, JBW, Karg, RS, Spitzer, RL. User’s guide for the SCID-5-CV Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5® disorders: clinical version. Arlington, VA, US: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2016.Google Scholar
Ekselius, L, Lindström, E, von Knorring, L, Bodlund, O, Kullgren, G. SCID II interviews and the SCID Screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorders in DSM-III-R. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994;90:120–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01566.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankman, SA, Funkhouser, CJ, Klein, DN, Davila, J, Lerner, D, Hee, D. Reliability and validity of severity dimensions of psychopathology assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2018;27:e1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S, Wheelwright, S, Skinner, R, Martin, J, Clubley, E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J Autism Dev Disord 2001;31:517. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005653411471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritvo, RA, Ritvo, ER, Guthrie, D, Ritvo, MJ, Hufnagel, DH, McMahon, W, et al. The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R): a scale to assist the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in adults: an international validation study. J Autism Dev Disord 2011;41:1076–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1133-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S, Wheelwright, S. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord 2004;34:163–75. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavassoli, T, Hoekstra, RA, Baron-Cohen, S. The Sensory Perception Quotient (SPQ): development and validation of a new sensory questionnaire for adults with and without autism. Mol Autism 2014;5:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-5-29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AT, Steer, RA, Brown, G. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation: 1996.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C, Gorsuch, R, Lushene, R, Vagg, P, Jacobs, G. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y1 – Y2). vol. IV. 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotti, A, Lazzari, R. Validation and reliability of the Italian EAT-26. Eat Weight Disord 1998;3:188–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, DM, Olmsted, MP, Bohr, Y, Garfinkel, PE. The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol Med 1982;12:871–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700049163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ising, HK, Veling, W, Loewy, RL, Rietveld, MW, Rietdijk, J, Dragt, S, et al. The validity of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population. Schizophr Bull 2012;38:1288–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, RF, Derringer, J, Markon, KE, Watson, D, Skodol, AE. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5, Brief Form (PID-5-BF) – Adult. 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossati, A, Borroni, S. Narcisismo patologico. Aspetti clinici e forensi. 2018.Google Scholar
Pincus, AL, Ansell, EB, Pimentel, CA, Cain, NM, Wright, AGC, Levy, KN. Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychol Assess 2009;21:365–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, C, Auyeung, B, Baron-Cohen, S. Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism Screening: the Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012;51:202212.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.11.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, M-C, Lombardo, MV, Auyeung, B, Chakrabarti, B, Baron-Cohen, S. Sex/Gender Differences and Autism: setting the Scene for Future Research. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015;54:1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2014.10.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, M-C, Lombardo, MV, Ruigrok, AN, Chakrabarti, B, Auyeung, B, Szatmari, P, et al. Quantifying and exploring camouflaging in men and women with autism. Autism 2017;21:690702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingston, LA, Happé, F. Conceptualising compensation in neurodevelopmental disorders: reflections from autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;80:729–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rynkiewicz, A, Lassalle, A, King, B, Smith, R, Mazur, A, Podgórska-Bednarz, J, et al. Females and autism – Oxford bibliographies in childhood studies 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791231-0209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, L, Petrides, KV, Mandy, W. The female autism phenotype and camouflaging: a narrative review. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 2020;7:306–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-020-00197-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mae Simcoe, S, Brownlow, C, Garnett, MS, Rynkiewicz, A, Attwood, T. Profiling autism symptomatology: an exploration of the Q-ASC parental report scale in capturing sex differences in autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2018;48:389403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3324-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandy, W, Lai, M-C. Towards sex- and gender-informed autism research. Autism 2017;21:643–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317706904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rynkiewicz, A, Schuller, B, Marchi, E, Piana, S, Camurri, A, Lassalle, A, et al. An investigation of the “female camouflage effect” in autism using a computerized ADOS-2 and a test of sex/gender differences. Mol Autism 2016;7:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0073-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynkiewicz, A, Janas-Kozik, M, Słopień, A. Girls and women with autism. Psychiatr Pol 2019;53:737–52. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/95098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kung, KTF. Autistic traits, gender minority stress, and mental health in transgender and non-binary adults. J Autism Dev Disord 2024;54:1389–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05875-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrier, V, Greenberg, DM, Weir, E, Buckingham, C, Smith, P, Lai, M-C, et al. Elevated rates of autism, other neurodevelopmental and psychiatric diagnoses, and autistic traits in transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Nat Commun 2020;11:3959. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17794-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fietz, J, Valencia, N, Silani, G. Alexithymia and autistic traits as possible predictors for traits related to depression, anxiety, and stress: a multivariate statistical approach. J Eval Clin Pract 2018;24:901–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundström, S, Chang, Z, Kerekes, N, Gumpert, CH, Råstam, M, Gillberg, C, et al. Autistic-like traits and their association with mental health problems in two nationwide twin cohorts of children and adults. Psychol Med 2011;41:2423–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711000377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu-Akel, A, Clark, J, Perry, A, Wood, SJ, Forty, L, Craddock, N, et al. Autistic and schizotypal traits and global functioning in bipolar I disorder. J Affect Disord 2017;207:268–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanne, SM, Christ, SE, Reiersen, AM. Psychiatric symptoms and psychosocial difficulties in young adults with autistic traits. J Autism Dev Disord 2009;39:827–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0688-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunihira, Y, Senju, A, Dairoku, H, Wakabayashi, A, Hasegawa, T. “Autistic” traits in non-autistic Japanese populations: relationships with personality traits and cognitive ability. J Autism Dev Disord 2006;36:553–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0094-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsuo, J, Kamio, Y, Takahashi, H, Ota, M, Teraishi, T, Hori, H, et al. Autistic-like traits in adult patients with mood disorders and schizophrenia. PloS One 2015;10:e0122711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, P, Howlin, P, Savage, S, Bolton, P, Rutter, M. Self and informant reports of mental health difficulties among adults with autism findings from a long-term follow-up study. Autism Int J Res Pract 2015;19:832–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315585916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muris, P, Ollendick, TH. Selective mutism and its relations to social anxiety disorder and autism spectrum disorder. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2021;24:294325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-020-00342-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noris, B, Barker, M, Nadel, J, Hentsch, F, Ansermet, F, Billard, A. Measuring gaze of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in naturalistic interactions. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Int Conf 2011;2011:5356–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091325.Google Scholar
White, SW, Ollendick, TH, Bray, BC. College students on the autism spectrum: prevalence and associated problems. Autism Int J Res Pract 2011;15:683701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361310393363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrugia, S, Hudson, J. Anxiety in adolescents with asperger syndrome: negative thoughts, behavioral problems, and life interference. Focus Autism Dev Disabil 2006;21:2535. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576060210010401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cath, DC, Ran, N, Smit, JH, van Balkom, AJLM, Comijs, HC. Symptom overlap between autism spectrum disorder, generalized social anxiety disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults: a preliminary case-controlled study. Psychopathology 2008;41:101–10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000111555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puleo, CM, Kendall, PC. Anxiety disorders in typically developing youth: autism spectrum symptoms as a predictor of cognitive-behavioral treatment. J Autism Dev Disord 2011;41:275–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1047-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonoff, E, Pickles, A, Charman, T, Chandler, S, Loucas, T, Baird, G. Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2008;47:921–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e318179964f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SW, Oswald, D, Ollendick, T, Scahill, L. Anxiety in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Clin Psychol Rev 2009;29:216–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brede, J, Babb, C, Jones, C, Elliott, M, Zanker, C, Tchanturia, K, et al. “For Me, the Anorexia is Just a Symptom, and the Cause is the Autism”: investigating restrictive eating disorders in autistic women. J Autism Dev Disord 2020;50:4280–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04479-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huke, V, Turk, J, Saeidi, S, Kent, A, Morgan, JF. Autism spectrum disorders in eating disorder populations: a systematic review. Eur Eat Disord Rev J Eat Disord Assoc 2013;21:345–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S, Jaffa, T, Davies, S, Auyeung, B, Allison, C, Wheelwright, S. Do girls with anorexia nervosa have elevated autistic traits? Mol Autism 2013;4:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courty, A, Maria, AS, Lalanne, C, Ringuenet, D, Vindreau, C, Chevallier, C, et al. Levels of autistic traits in anorexia nervosa: a comparative psychometric study. BMC Psychiatry 2013;13:222. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchanturia, K, Smith, E, Weineck, F, Fidanboylu, E, Kern, N, Treasure, J, et al. Exploring autistic traits in anorexia: a clinical study. Mol Autism 2013;4:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vagni, D, Moscone, D, Travaglione, S, Cotugno, A. Using the Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R) disentangle the heterogeneity of autistic traits in an Italian eating disorder population. Res Autism Spectr Disord 2016;32:143–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Crescenzo, F, Postorino, V, Siracusano, M, Riccioni, A, Armando, M, Curatolo, P, et al. Autistic symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psych 2019;10:78. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Os, J, Hanssen, M, Bijl, RV, Strauss, Ravelli A. (1969) revisited: a psychosis continuum in the general population? Schizophr Res 2000;45:1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00224-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, LS, Owen, MJ. Genetic overlap between autism, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Genome Med 2009;1:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/gm102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foss-Feig, JH, Adkinson, BD, Ji, JL, Yang, G, Srihari, VH, McPartland, JC, et al. Searching for cross-diagnostic convergence: neural mechanisms governing excitation and inhibition balance in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2017;81:848–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.03.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foss-Feig, JH, Velthorst, E, Smith, L, Reichenberg, A, Addington, J, Cadenhead, KS, et al. Clinical profiles and conversion rates among young individuals with autism spectrum disorder who present to clinical high risk for psychosis services. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019;58:582–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.09.446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jutla, A, Foss-Feig, J, Veenstra-VanderWeele, J. Autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia: an updated conceptual review. Autism Res Off J Int Soc Autism Res 2022;15:384412. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, M-C, Kassee, C, Besney, R, Bonato, S, Hull, L, Mandy, W, et al. Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2019;6:819–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, Z, Zheng, P, Zou, X. Association between schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism Res Off J Int Soc Autism Res 2018;11:1110–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kincaid, DL, Doris, M, Shannon, C, Mulholland, C. What is the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder and ASD traits in psychosis? A systematic review. Psychiatry Res 2017;250:99105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpita, B, Nardi, B, Bonelli, C, Massimetti, E, Amatori, G, Cremone, IM, et al. Presence and correlates of autistic traits among patients with social anxiety disorder. Front Psych 2023;14:1320558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1320558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell’Osso, L, Amatori, G, Bonelli, C, Nardi, B, Massimetti, E, Cremone, IM, et al. Autistic traits underlying social anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and panic disorders. CNS Spectr 2024:134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852924000154.Google ScholarPubMed
Mannion, A, Brahm, M, Leader, G. Comorbid psychopathology in autism spectrum disorder. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 2014;1:124–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0012-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebel-Schwalm, M, Worley, J. Other disorders frequently comorbid with autism. In: Davis, TE III, White, SW, Ollendick, TH, editors. Handbook of Autism and Anxiety, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014, p. 4760. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06796-4_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vannucchi, G, Masi, G, Toni, C, Dell’Osso, L, Marazziti, D, Perugi, G. Clinical features, developmental course, and psychiatric comorbidity of adult autism spectrum disorders. CNS Spectr 2014;19:157–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852913000941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, E, Kim, S, Khanna, S, Pallanti, S. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders: diagnostic and dimensional issues. CNS Spectr 2007;12:513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900002467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprio, V, Mirra, L, Madeddu, F, Lopez-Castroman, J, Blasco-Fontecilla, H, Di Pierro, R, et al. Can clinical and subclinical forms of narcissism be considered risk factors for suicide-related outcomes? A systematic review. J Psychiatr Res 2024;172:307–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.02.017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erkoreka, L, Navarro, B. Vulnerable narcissism is associated with severity of depressive symptoms in dysthymic patients. Psychiatry Res 2017;257:265–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J, Lamkin, J, Gentile, B, Lynam, D, Campbell, WK. Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism from the perspective of the interpersonal circumplex. Personal Individ Differ 2012;53:507–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broglia, G, Nisticò, V, Di Paolo, B, Faggioli, R, Bertani, A, Gambini, O, et al. Traits of narcissistic vulnerability in adults with autism spectrum disorders without intellectual disabilities. Autism Res 2024;17:138–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.3065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, U, de Vignemont, F. Egocentrism, allocentrism, and Asperger syndrome. Conscious Cogn 2005;14:719–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Sociodemographic information

Figure 1

Figure 1. Z-score values of AQ, RAADS, EQ, and SPQ total scores in the three clusters.

Figure 2

Table 2. Dispersion analysis for cluster analysis based on AQ, RAADS-r, EQ, and SPQ-SF35 total scores

Figure 3

Table 3. Comparison of BDI-II and STAI, EAT-26, PQ-16, PID-5-BF, and PNI scores among cluster groups

Figure 4

Table 4. Summary of canonical discriminant functions for discriminant analysis

Figure 5

Figure 2. Discriminant analysis: group graphic.

Figure 6

Table 5. Structure matrix for discriminant analysis

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.