Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:42:11.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predictors of the use of Psychosocial Interventions in Portugal: Results from the SMAILE Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

G. Cardoso
Affiliation:
NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Centre CEDOC, Lisboa, Portugal
A. Antunes
Affiliation:
University of Coimbra, CEGOT, Centre of Studies on Geography and Spatial Planning, Coimbra, Portugal
A. Loureiro
Affiliation:
University of Coimbra, CEGOT, Centre of Studies on Geography and Spatial Planning, Coimbra, Portugal
P. Santana
Affiliation:
University of Coimbra, CEGOT, Centre of Studies on Geography and Spatial Planning, Coimbra, Portugal
J. Caldas-de-Almeida
Affiliation:
University of Coimbra, CEGOT, Centre of Studies on Geography and Spatial Planning, Coimbra, Portugal
M. Silva
Affiliation:
University of Coimbra, CEGOT, Centre of Studies on Geography and Spatial Planning, Coimbra, Portugal

Abstract

Introduction

The treatment of psychiatric disorders depends on a combination of different types of care, such as psychiatric treatment and psychosocial interventions. However, there is little research on the factors that determine access to care, particularly to psychosocial interventions.

Objectives

To characterize the use of psychosocial interventions (psychotherapy, day hospital, and psychosocial rehabilitation) in users of outpatient psychiatric services in Portugal.

Aims

This retrospective study analyses all outpatient psychiatric visits in four Portuguese departments of psychiatry in the metropolitan areas of Lisbon and Porto, and aims to evaluate the socio-demographic and clinical determinants of psychosocial interventions.

Methods

Socio-demographic and clinical variables were obtained from clinical charts of outpatients’ visits in 2002, 2007 and 2012 (n = 2621). All patients were characterized regarding the use of any psychosocial intervention beyond psychiatric consultations. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictors of psychosocial interventions use.

Results

Being followed in 2012, being single, having no professional activity, and having a diagnosis of psychosis or common mental disorder were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with higher odds of accessing psychosocial interventions. On the other hand, a lower level of education was associated with less use of this type of care.

Conclusions

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of psychiatric services, outpatients are determinants of the use of psychosocial interventions. Evidence suggests that social inequalities may influence the access to psychosocial interventions in Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal.

Type
e-Poster walk: Epidemiology and social psychiatry; intellectual disability
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.