Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:23:58.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Platform for systems medicine research and diagnostic applications in psychotic disorders—The METSY project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Elisabeth Frank
Affiliation:
aBiomax Informatics AB, 82152Planegg, Germany
Dieter Maier
Affiliation:
aBiomax Informatics AB, 82152Planegg, Germany
Juha Pajula
Affiliation:
bVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., FI-33720Tampere, Finland
Tommi Suvitaival
Affiliation:
cSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, DK-2820Gentofte, Denmark
Faith Borgan
Affiliation:
dDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, LondonWC2R 2LSUK ePsychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, LondonW12 0HSUK
Markus Butz-Ostendorf
Affiliation:
aBiomax Informatics AB, 82152Planegg, Germany
Alexander Fischer
Affiliation:
fPhilips GmbH Innovative Technologies, 52074Aachen, Germany
Jarmo Hietala
Affiliation:
gDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Turku, FI-20520Turku, Finland hTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, FI-20521Turku, Finland
Oliver Howes
Affiliation:
dDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, LondonWC2R 2LSUK ePsychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, LondonW12 0HSUK
Tuulia Hyötyläinen
Affiliation:
iDepartment of Chemistry, Örebro University, 702 81Örebro, Sweden
Joost Janssen
Affiliation:
jChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
Heikki Laurikainen
Affiliation:
gDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Turku, FI-20520Turku, Finland hTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, FI-20521Turku, Finland
Carmen Moreno
Affiliation:
jChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
Jaana Suvisaari
Affiliation:
kNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), FI-00300Helsinki, Finland
Mark Van Gils
Affiliation:
bVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., FI-33720Tampere, Finland
Matej Orešič*
Affiliation:
lTurku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520Turku, Finland mSchool of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 702 81Örebro, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author at: Matej Orešič, Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Tykistokatu 6, FI-20520 Turku, Finland. Tel.: +358 44 972 6094. E-mail address: [email protected]

Abstract

Psychotic disorders are associated with metabolic abnormalities including alterations in glucose and lipid metabolism. A major challenge in the treatment of psychosis is to identify patients with vulnerable metabolic profiles who may be at risk of developing cardiometabolic co-morbidities. It is established that both central and peripheral metabolic organs use lipids to control energy balance and regulate peripheral insulin sensitivity. The endocannabinoid system, implicated in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, has been shown to be dysregulated in psychosis. It is currently unclear how these endocannabinoid abnormalities relate to metabolic changes in psychosis. Here we review recent research in the field of metabolic co-morbidities in psychotic disorders as well as the methods to study them and potential links to the endocannabinoid system. We also describe the bioinformatics platforms developed in the EU project METSY for the investigations of the biological etiology in patients at risk of psychosis and in first episode psychosis patients. The METSY project was established with the aim to identify and evaluate multi-modal peripheral and neuroimaging markers that may be able to predict the onset and prognosis of psychiatric and metabolic symptoms in patients at risk of developing psychosis and first episode psychosis patients. Given the intrinsic complexity and widespread role of lipid metabolism, a systems biology approach which combines molecular, structural and functional neuroimaging methods with detailed metabolic characterisation and multi-variate network analysis is essential in order to identify how lipid dysregulation may contribute to psychotic disorders. A decision support system, integrating clinical, neuropsychological and neuroimaging data, was also developed in order to aid clinical decision making in psychosis. Knowledge of common and specific mechanisms may aid the etiopathogenic understanding of psychotic and metabolic disorders, facilitate early disease detection, aid treatment selection and elucidate new targets for pharmacological treatments.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2018

1. Introduction

Psychosis is a mental illness characterized by impairments in reality testing or reality distortion. Psychotic symptoms can appear in many psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia or psychotic episodes in affective disorders. Psychotic symptoms are typically observed as delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, and bizarre or catatonic behavior. The incidence of psychotic disorders peaks in young adulthood [Reference Pedersen, Mors, Bertelsen, Waltoft, Agerbo and McGrath1], a period of development when significant changes in fatty acid composition occur in the cerebral cortex due to axonal myelination [Reference Carver, Benford, Han and Cantor2]. The increased rates of myelination during adolescence, both in cortical regions and in hubs of the connectome, have been associated with a gene expression profile enriched for schizophrenia-related genes [Reference Whitaker, Vertes, Romero-Garcia, Vasa, Moutoussis and Prabhu3]. The lifetime prevalence of these disorders is about 3.5%, the most common being schizophrenia with approximately 1% lifetime prevalence [Reference Perälä, Suvisaari, Saarni, Kuoppasalmi, Isometsä and Pirkola4]. The cost of psychotic disorders in Europe was estimated at 93.3 billion euros in 2010 [Reference Gustavsson, Svensson, Jacobi, Allgulander, Alonso and Beghi5]. Schizophrenia is associated with a reduced life expectancy of 15–20 years [6,7] due to a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease [Reference Ringen, Engh, Birkenaes, Dieset and Andreassen8] and metabolic syndrome [Reference Malhotra, Grover, Chakrabarti and Kulhara9].

In September 2013, the collaborative European project METSY (Neuroimaging platform for characterisation of metabolic co-morbidities in psychotic disorders) was initiated (http://metsy.eu/), with the overall objective to identify and evaluate multi-modal peripheral and neuroimaging markers that can predict and monitor psychotic and metabolic symptoms, aiding the diagnosis and prognosis of both psychiatric and metabolic diseases. The aim of this collaborative project is to investigate how dysregulations in the lipid metabolism might explain psychiatric and metabolic abnormalities by using neuroimaging and bioinformatics methods.

In this paper, we highlight and review the key research questions addressed by the METSY project and describe the bioinformatics platforms that we used in order to investigate the biological etiology in first episode psychosis patients and in subjects at risk of psychosis.

2. Metabolic co-morbidities in psychotic disorders

Unhealthy lifestyles and pharmacological side effects have been suggested to be a major cause of excess mortality rates in patients with psychotic disorders. Schizophrenia patients exhibiting negative symptoms such as anhedonia and social withdrawal are more prone to becoming overweight and developing metabolic syndrome, which may in turn increase the risk of cardiovascular morbidity [Reference Arango, Bobes, Kirkpatrick, Garcia-Garcia and Rejas10]. Additionally, the use of antipsychotic medication, especially second generation antipsychotics, has been consistently associated with weight gain, insulin resistance and the development of metabolic syndrome [11–14], which seems to be more marked in younger people [Reference De Hert, Dobbelaere, Sheridan, Cohen and Correll15]. After only six months of treatment with specific second-generation antipsychotics, the percentage of previously drug naïve first episode psychosis patients at risk of developing the metabolic syndrome rises from 17% to 40% [Reference Fraguas, Merchan-Naranjo, Laita, Parellada, Moreno and Ruiz-Sancho16]. This evidence suggests that these psychotropic drugs target brain regions involved in regulating energy balance and metabolism.

However, pharmacological side effects and unhealthy lifestyles only explain a fraction of the metabolic co-morbidities shown in psychosis. Abnormal glucose homeostasis, hyperinsulinemia and accumulation of visceral fat are already evident in drug-naïve first episode psychosis patients, independently of obesity [17,18]. In the WHO World Health Survey, as compared with the absence of symptoms, having one psychotic symptom was associated with higher odds (OR 1.71; 95% CI, 1.61–1.81) of diabetes mellitus in the general population, with increasing likelihood as the number of psychotic symptoms increased [Reference Nuevo, Chatterji, Fraguas, Verdes, Naidoo and Arango19]. Furthermore, unaffected first-degree relatives of people with schizophrenia also have higher rates of diabetes mellitus (19–30%) compared to the general population (1.2–6.3%) [Reference Mukherjee, Schnur and Reddy20]. Some recent genetic studies have detected genes that increase the risk of both schizophrenia and type 2 diabetes (T2D) [Reference Hansen, Ingason, Djurovic, Melle, Fenger and Gustafsson21]; however, there have been negative findings as well [22,23]. Taken together, these observations suggest that metabolic disturbances associated with obesity may contribute to the etiopathogenesis of psychosis.

The role of cannabis use in increasing the relative risk for the development of psychosis is well established [Reference Marconi, Di Forti, Lewis, Murray and Vassos24]. The endocannabinoid system is comprised of lipid-derived endogenous cannabinoid ligands, enzymes involved in the synthesis and degradation of these ligands and the cannabinoid 1 and 2 receptors which have affinity to these endogenous cannabinoid ligands. The cannabinoid 1 receptor has been postulated to be dysregulated in both psychotic and metabolic diseases [25,26]. The CB1R is a G-protein coupled receptor widely distributed centrally throughout the cortex, striatum, hippocampus and cerebellum. However, CB1Rs are also distributed in the periphery throughout the gastrointestinal tract, liver, adipose tissue and adrenal glands [Reference Pagotto, Marsicano, Cota, Lutz and Pasquali27]. The CB1R has been implicated in the etiology of metabolic diseases based on evidence that CB1R agonists dysregulate both glucose and lipid metabolism [Reference Scheen and Paquot28]. In line with these findings, selective CB1R antagonists have been demonstrated to be effective for weight-loss leading to favorable changes in both lipid and glucose levels [Reference Colombo, Agabio, Diaz, Lobina, Reali and Gessa29]. However, further research is warranted to investigate how endocannabinoid dysregulation in psychosis relates to metabolic abnormalities in psychosis.

3. Experimental approaches used to study metabolic co-morbidities in psychoses – METSY platforms

3.1. Metabolomics

Metabolomics is a comprehensive study of small molecules (i.e., metabolites) in cells, tissues and biofluids, including their biochemical transformation and responses to environmental and genetic perturbations. Metabolomics provides new tools to study the etiopathology of psychotic disorders as well as metabolic dysregulation arising following the use of antipsychotics [30–35]. However, metabolomics has also played an important role in unravelling putative biomarkers and underlying pathways in several other diseases of the central nervous system [Reference Quinones and Kaddurah-Daouk36], including major depressive disorder [37,38], Autism spectrum disorder [Reference West, Amaral, Bais, Smith, Egnash and Ross39], Alzheimer’s [40–43] and Parkinsons [44–46] diseases. Since the metabolome is sensitive to both genetic and environmental factors, such as drug exposure, metabolomics was chosen as a key ‘omics’ platform for molecular phenotyping in the METSY project.

Studying the metabolome in a population-based study, Oresic and colleagues found that schizophrenia was associated with elevated serum levels of specific triglycerides, hyperinsulinemia, and the upregulation of the serum amino acid proline [Reference Oresic, Tang, Seppanen-Laakso, Mattila, Saarni and Saarni31]. Using a network approach, the metabolic profiles were combined with other clinical and lifestyle data to create a diagnostic model which discriminated schizophrenia from other psychotic illnesses. Recently, as part of the METSY project, metabolomics has also been applied to study the metabolite profiles predicting weight gain and the development of other metabolic abnormalities in patients with first-episode psychosis [Reference Suvitaival, Mantere, Kieseppa, Mattila, Poho and Hyotylainen47], where weight gain was associated with increased levels of triglycerides with low carbon number and double bond count at baseline. These lipids are known to be associated with increased liver fat [48,49]. These preliminary results suggest that the first-episode psychosis patients who are at the highest risk of rapid weight gain, tend to have increased levels of lipids linked to liver fat prior to becoming obese. However, it is unclear whether there is a common biological mechanism underlying metabolic changes shown in first-episode psychosis. Clearly larger prospective studies are needed in order to confirm these findings – which is one of the research activities of the METSY project.

3.2. Neuroimaging methods

An extensive body of literature over the last 40 years has documented subtle but widespread structural and functional changes in the brains of patients with non-affective and affective psychotic disorders. These changes are usually most prominent in fronto-temporal regions but it is now evident that these changes are more widespread, extending to posterior brain regions [Reference Brugger and Howes50]. The progression of structural brain changes, particularly grey matter volume loss, has been found in the early onset schizophrenia, including both adult and adolescent-onset cases [51,52]. These volumetric changes are also shown in antipsychotic- naïve patients and become greater over time [Reference Haijma, Van Haren, Cahn, Koolschijn, Hulshoff Pol and Kahn53], and have been correlated with poor clinical outcomes [Reference Arango, Rapado-Castro, Reig, Castro-Fornieles, Gonzalez-Pinto and Otero51]. Interestingly, volumetric reductions in frontal and temporal grey matter have also been linked to weight gain in healthy subjects [Reference Minichino, Ando, Francesconi, Salatino, Delle Chiaie and Cadenhead54]. These findings suggest that volumetric changes in the structure of the brain are related to the severity of clinical and metabolic changes in psychosis.

Psychoses and most notably schizophrenia are widely characterized as disorders of brain disconnectivity. The term ‘connectome’ coined by Sporns and colleagues emphasizes the importance of appreciating network-level connectivity in order to understand brain function and dysfunction [Reference Sporns, Tononi and Kotter55]. The ‘connectomics’ imaging – literature postulates that there are two overlapping types of disconnectivity in psychosis: context-independent functional connectivity deficits and context-dependent alterations with transient hypo- and hyperactivity patterns [Reference Fornito, Zalesky, Pantelis and Bullmore56]. However, further research is warranted to investigate how network-level connectivity can be modulated by molecular alterations.

In vivo molecular imaging studies have consistently shown that un-medicated patients with schizophrenia exhibit an increase in striatal dopamine synthesis and release [57–59]. However, it is clear that dopamine dysregulation in psychosis is part of a larger problem in the connectome involving also other neurotransmitter pathways, in particular the glutamate and GABA systems. The endocannabinoid receptor CB1R, located on pre-synaptic nerve terminals of glutamatergic and GABAergic nerve terminals, plays a fundamental neuro-modulatory role in the brain due to its ability to inhibit the release of both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters. CB1R begin modulating the fine tuning of excitatory/inhibitory neurotransmitter release during periods of pre- and postnatal brain development [Reference Harkany, Guzman, Galve-Roperh, Berghuis, Devi and Mackie60], thought to be central in the etiology of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Previous attempts to quantify the CB1R in vivo in schizophrenia have been largely unsuccessful due to high levels of tracer lipophilicity [Reference Yasuno, Brown, Zoghbi, Krushinski, Chernet and Tauscher61], the use of irreversible tracers and the failure to use arterial blood sampling to quantify the tracer kinetics [62,63]. However, it is now possible to elucidate the role of CB1R in patients with psychosis due to the development of specific positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers, such as [11C]OMAR, [11C]MEPPEP and [18F]FMPEP-d2. These tracers bind reversibly with high specificity to CB1R in healthy volunteers and have appropriate kinetic properties for compartmental modeling of receptor availability as well as good test-retest reliability [64–67]. A recent study using arterial blood sampling and appropriate quantification techniques found that medication naïve schizophrenia patients abstaining from cannabis use showed a down-regulation of the CB1R in the hypothalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, caudate and insula [Reference Ranganathan, Cortes-Briones, Radhakrishnan, Thurnauer, Planeta and Skosnik68]. In line with these findings, non-medicated with schizophrenia also show greater central levels of anandamide, an endogenous cannabinoid agonist compared to healthy volunteers [Reference Leweke, Giuffrida, Koethe, Schreiber, Nolden and Kranaster69]. However, further work is needed to elucidate how central and peripheral endocannabinoid dysregulation is linked to metabolic dysregulation in schizophrenia.

PET and MRI are established neuroimaging tools, but generally used independently. Recently, a hybrid PET/MR system, which allows for acquisition of such complementary information consecutively in the same study session without repositioning of the subject has been established. This system provides truly simultaneous, complementary information on different aspects of brain function (e.g., CBR1 availability, white matter integrity) by the different modalities without the temporal limitations of conducting separate PET and MRI scans. MRI-based data on brain morphology and white matter tract integrity have been used to quantify structural connectivity patterns of the brain of the cannabinoid systems as measured with PET and network connectivity, such as the default mode network (DMN) in the brain. The DMN is activated when the brain is at wakeful rest and not focusing on the outer world but rather engaged with internal tasks (e.g. daydreaming, spontaneous thoughts, memories). DMN is usually regarded as a predominantly context-independent phenomenon. Despite the fact that resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) has become a powerful tool to explore the dysconnectivity of brain networks in psychotic disorders, very little is known about the role of specific neurotransmitters involved in emergence and maintaining DMN activity.

4. Platform for modeling multi-modal data in the studies of psychotic disorders

The METSY bioinformatics platform is comprised of three inter-related components (Fig. 1):

Fig. 1 Outline of the METSY bioinformatics platform, bridging the systems medicine research approaches with the applications in the clinic. The platform integrates three components: network analysis, semantic modelling and decision support system. (A) Network analysis to integrate heterogeneous data (multi-omics, in vivo molecular neuroimaging, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging and psychosocial) based on partical correlations (example from an earlier study [Reference Oresic, Seppanen-Laakso, Sun, Tang, Therman and Viehman32]). (B) Semantic modelling to annotate heterogeneous data with biological and literature-based annotations, representing knowledge as network which integrates associations otherwise separated in individual data sources. Integration is based on mapping of equivalentmeaning and objects across all information types relevant in a life science project. (C) Development of a decision support system to facilitate decision-making in the clinic based on multi-modal diagnostic information.

  1. 1. Network analysis to integrate heterogeneous data (multi-omics, in vivo molecular neuroimaging, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging and psychosocial);

  2. 2. Semantic modelling to annotate heterogeneous data with biological and literature-based annotations;

  3. 3. Development of a decision support system to facilitate decision-making in the clinic based on multi-modal diagnostic information.

4.1. Integrative approaches to identify the biomarkers of psychotic disorders

Network analysis and metabolomics can be powerful tools for dissecting complex disease-related metabolic pathways and for identifying candidate diagnostic and prognostic markers in psychiatric research [Reference Oresic, Tang, Seppanen-Laakso, Mattila, Saarni and Saarni31]. The integration of this kind of analysis with imaging and genetic data may facilitate the identification of early risk biomarkers associated with the comorbid cardio-metabolic complications in psychosis.

Network analyses combining metabolomics and genetics data have previously been used to identify metabolic profiles associated with the specific schizophrenia risk genes in the first-episode patients [Reference He, Yu, Giegling, Xie, Hartmann and Prehn33]. This study showed that aberrations in biosynthetic pathways linked to glutamine and arginine metabolism might contribute to etiopathogenesis of schizophrenia. Orešič et al. studied plasma lipidomic profiles in twin pairs discordant for schizophrenia and found that patients were more likely to be insulin resistant and have high triglyceride levels, compared to their co-twins [Reference Oresic, Seppanen-Laakso, Sun, Tang, Therman and Viehman32]. Furthermore, integrative analysis of neuroimaging and lipidomics data revealed that volumetric reductions in grey matter were associated with elevated triglyceride levels.

Extracting predictive biomarkers from multiple types of information requires the integration and correlation of existing knowledge and data from diverse sources and formats. Network construction and analysis is a promising approach facilitating data integration that is increasingly used in disease related research [70,71]. In this approach, networks are constructed from associations between variables and are integrated with prior knowledge that is also represented in a network form. Currently, most prior knowledge is not readily accessible for analysis since it exists in different repositories for structured (comprising about 1400 public databases on molecular biology related information [Reference Galperin and Fernandez-Suarez72]) and unstructured data such as high-content imaging, physiological, biochemical and clinical data. Bioinformatics methods, developed to bridge multiple sources and scales of knowledge into semantic networks, have recently been extended to imaging data and computational models [Reference Maier, Kalus, Wolff, Kalko, Roca and Marin de Mas73]. Another challenge that can be approached by networks is the representation of gained knowledge, e.g. how do changes of a specific receptor detected by PET imaging influence our prior knowledge about the overall phenomenon. Current neuroimaging methods are focused on correlation of voxel pattern to outcomes, largely neglecting existing mechanistic and structural information during the analysis. In order to provide systematic and structured information suitable for algorithmic analysis, METSY aims to structure the current knowledge (i.e. scientific literature, implicit expert knowledge, databases) into concepts, which can be mapped to the experimental and clinical data (Fig. 2). Using this approach, concepts relevant to a specific research area can be retrieved from the literature or defined by expert consensus and implemented as software concepts. In psychosis research, relevant concepts are for example “brain area”, “symptom” or “metabolite” and associations such as “causes” or “is consumed by”. Within the METSY project, we will apply the BioXM Knowledge Management Environment [73,74], which will allow us to adapt existing concepts throughout the course of the project using a graphical editor. Semantic mapping approaches can also be used to identify defined concepts from structured resources such as ontologies, neuroanatomical or functional atlases, databases or literature-mining. For example “brain area” might be populated from the Human anatomy atlas [Reference Rosse and Mejino75] and the FreeSurfer neuroanatomy atlas [Reference Desikan, Segonne, Fischl, Quinn, Dickerson and Blacker76]; while “metabolites” might be derived from the Human Metabolome Database [Reference Wishart, Jewison, Guo, Wilson, Knox and Liu77] and different symptoms associated to psychosis might be retrieved by automatic literature-mining. In this process, information from different sources can be mapped to the same concepts based on their meaning (semantics) and thereby integrated. This process can be automated for data extraction from various sources based on descriptions of the contained data and its format (metadata); however, some data extraction requires manual selection in cases where the source relates to specific areas of expertise (i.e. identifying the similarity of different neuroanatomical atlases). Within METSY, this approach allowed us to integrate structural brain connectivity data from the USC Multimodal Connectivity Database (UMCD) [Reference Brown, Rudie, Bandrowski, Van Horn and Bookheimer78] with functional brain area information from the Brede database [Reference Nielsen79] and brain gene expression data from the Allen Brain atlas [Reference Hawrylycz, Lein, Guillozet-Bongaarts, Shen, Ng and Miller80]. To this end, an experienced neuroanatomist manually mapped the areas of the Craddock200 atlas used by UMCD to the Brede WOROI ontology (Brede) and Human Allen Brain Atlas (Allen Brain) using MNI coordinates as common denominator. For example, left hippocampus (Craddock200) was mapped to 107 Left hippocampus (Brede WOROI) and 4249001 hippocampal formation, left (Human Allen Brain Atlas). Individual level data from the three sources was subsequently uploaded into the METSY knowledge portal which may be searched and visualized based on any of the mapped atlases. As an example, a DTI tract might state “in schizophrenic patient A, left hippocampus is connected with mammillary body by strength 91 while a functional association might be ‘left hippocampus and mammillary body are correlated with connectivity 0.008 during resting state in healthy volunteers’ and finally post-mortem expression data may indicate certain genes expressed in left hippocampus and mammillary body. Such mappings enable us to directly compute potential functional and molecular consequences of differences shown between schizophrenia patients and healthy volunteers, which are relevant to clinical decision making.

Fig. 2 Example of integrative analysis of connectome and gene expression data by using the semantic approach. Coloured dots indicate gene expression values for FKBP5 (taken from Human Allen Brain Atlas). Red colours indicate high expression values whereas blue colours indicate low values. In addition, we selected prefrontal cortex circuitry and display structural and functional connection strengths measured by DTI and fMRI, respectively. Structural connectivity is depicted by line thickness. Red line colouring indicates strong functional connectivity while blue indicates anti-correlated activity between the connected brain areas. Connection strengths are taken from the NKI_AVRG dataset – the average connectivity of all connectomes of the NKI Rockland study from the Human Connectome Project. Datasets available through the USC Multimodal Connectivity Database. All brain coordinates were transformed to a unified coordinate frame specified by the MNI-152 standard brain. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

4.2. Decision support system for psychotic disorders

Using integrated data from the METSY knowledge base, a novel clinical decision support and data visualization framework was adapted and applied to tackle heterogeneous patient information. The main focus of the framework was to provide a comprehensive overview of the patient’s disease state [Reference Mattila, Koikkalainen, Virkki, Simonsen, van Gils and Waldemar81], which denotes a patient’s degree of similarity to a previously diagnosed disease population. This was archived by implementing the disease state index (DSI) method and disease state fingerprint (DSF) visualizations [Reference Mattila, Koikkalainen, Virkki, van Gils and Lotjonen82] for the data contained within the METSY knowledge base. The DSF visualization clearly discloses how different components of the patient data contribute to the DSI, facilitating rapid interpretation of the information. The same methods were previously applied to examine Alzheimers disease and dementias in EU projects PredictAD, PredictND and VPH-DARE@IT.

DSI is a supervised machine learning algorithm, which quantifies the disease state of the patient. The method computes the statistical distributions for each measurement and uses them to quantify the disease state of the patient. The method produces a single variable for the patient, ranging between zero and one. An index value close to zero denotes that the patient has values similar to healthy subjects. By contrast, if the index is close to one, the measurements are more similar to diagnosed patients. The DSI can quantify a score, even if not all measures are available. The DSI classifier is accompanied by a disease state fingerprint (DSF) [Reference Mattila, Koikkalainen, Virkki, van Gils and Lotjonen82] visualization. The DSF has a tree structure, which represents the structure of the DSI classifier, highlighting which measures have the strongest prognostic value.

Within METSY, the DSI was used to combine volumetric data from MRI, psychiatric measures, clinical measures and selected metabolomics data (Fig. 1). The DSI was trained and tested with volumetric MRI, psychiatric and clinical measures selected based on earlier knowledge from the psychotic disorders. The metabolomics measures were selected based on the machine learning methods with dependency detection.

5. Conclusions

There is an urgent need to identify biomarkers that will facilitate the early detection of the pathophysiological processes leading to metabolic co-morbidities in psychotic patients. Given the complexity of the etiopathogenesis of psychotic disorders and their co-morbidities, biomarkers need to reflect relevant genetic, phenotypic, environmental and psychosocial factors. In METSY, we are adopting a network approach utilizing machine learning as well as semantic modeling strategies, in order to identify the key biomarkers of potential prognostic and diagnostic value. METSY has also developed a decision support tool aiming to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of both psychiatric and metabolic diseases. METSY therefore offers a platform, whereby scientific advancements in medical research can inform and improve clinical practice.

Conflict of interest

E.F., D.M. and M.B.-O. are employed by Biomax Informatics AG and therefore will be affected by any commercial implications caused by this manuscript. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The project Neuroimaging platform for characterization of metabolic co-morbidities in psychotic disorders (METSY), has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (project no. 602478).

References

Pedersen, CBMors, OBertelsen, AWaltoft, BLAgerbo, EMcGrath, JJ et al. A comprehensive nationwide study of the incidence rate and lifetime risk for treated mental disorders. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:573–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carver, JDBenford, VJHan, BCantor, ABThe relationship between age and the fatty acid composition of cerebral cortex and erythrocytes in human subjects. Brain Res Bull 2001; 56:7985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitaker, KJVertes, PERomero-Garcia, RVasa, FMoutoussis, MPrabhu, G et al. Adolescence is associated with genomically patterned consolidation of the hubs of the human brain connectome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:9105–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perälä, JSuvisaari, JSaarni, SIKuoppasalmi, KIsometsä, EPirkola, S et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64:1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustavsson, ASvensson, MJacobi, FAllgulander, CAlonso, JBeghi, E et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21:718–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, SExcess mortality of schizophrenia. A meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 1997; 171:502–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saha, SChant, DMcGrath, JA systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia: is the differential mortality gap worsening over time. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64:1123–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringen, PAEngh, JABirkenaes, ABDieset, IAndreassen, OAIncreased mortality in schizophrenia due to cardiovascular disease—a non-systematic review of epidemiology, possible causes, and interventions. Front Psychiatry 2014; 5:137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malhotra, NGrover, SChakrabarti, SKulhara, PMetabolic syndrome in schizophrenia. Indian J Psychol Med 2013; 35:227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arango, CBobes, JKirkpatrick, BGarcia-Garcia, MRejas, JPsychopathology, coronary heart disease and metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia spectrum patients with deficit versus non-deficit schizophrenia: findings from the CLAMORS study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21:867–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correll, CUKane, JMManu, PObesity and coronary risk in patients treated with second-generation antipsychotics. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011; 261:417–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, HMeyer, JMJeste, DVAtypical antipsychotics and glucose dysregulation: a systematic review. Schizophr Res 2004; 71:195212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcomer, JWSecond-generation (atypical) antipsychotics and metabolic effects: a comprehensive literature review. CNS Drugs 19(Suppl. 1)2005; 193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, ODBhatnagar, AGaughran, FPAmiel, SAMurray, RMPilowsky, LSA prospective study of impairment in glucose control caused by clozapine without changes in insulin resistance. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:361–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Hert, MDobbelaere, MSheridan, EMCohen, DCorrell, CUMetabolic and endocrine adverse effects of second-generation antipsychotics in children and adolescents: a systematic review of randomized, placebo controlled trials and guidelines for clinical practice. Eur Psychiatry 2011; 26:144–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraguas, DMerchan-Naranjo, JLaita, PParellada, MMoreno, DRuiz-Sancho, A et al. Metabolic and hormonal side effects in children and adolescents treated with second-generation antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry 2008; 69:1166–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, BMiller, BJGarcia-Rizo, CFernandez-Egea, EBernardo, MIs abnormal glucose tolerance in antipsychotic-naive patients with nonaffective psychosis confounded by poor health habits?. Schizophr Bull 2012; 38:280–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillinger, TBeck, KGobjila, CDonocik, JGJauhar, SHowes, ODImpaired glucose homeostasis in first-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74:261–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuevo, RChatterji, SFraguas, DVerdes, ENaidoo, NArango, C et al. Increased risk of diabetes mellitus among persons with psychotic symptoms: results from the WHO World Health Survey. J Clin Psychiatry 2011; 72:1592–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, SSchnur, DBReddy, RFamily history of type 2 diabetes in schizophrenic patients. Lancet 1989; 1:495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, TIngason, ADjurovic, SMelle, IFenger, MGustafsson, O et al. At-risk variant in TCF7L2 for type II diabetes increases risk of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70:5963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kajio, YKondo, KSaito, TIwayama, YAleksic, BYamada, K et al. Genetic association study between the detected risk variants based upon type II diabetes GWAS and psychotic disorders in the Japanese population. J Hum Genet 2014; 59:5456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padmanabhan, JLNanda, PTandon, NMothi, SSBolo, NMcCarroll, S et al. Polygenic risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus among individuals with psychosis and their relatives. J Psychiatr Res 2016; 77:5258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marconi, ADi Forti, MLewis, CMMurray, RMVassos, EMeta-analysis of the association between the level of cannabis use and risk of psychosis. Schizophr Bull 2016; 42:1262–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatta-Cherifi, BCota, DEndocannabinoids and metabolic disorders. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2015; 231:367–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, HCMackie, KAn introduction to the endogenous cannabinoid system. Biol Psychiatry 2016; 79:516–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagotto, UMarsicano, GCota, DLutz, BPasquali, RThe emerging role of the endocannabinoid system in endocrine regulation and energy balance. Endocr Rev 2006; 27:73100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheen, AJPaquot, NUse of cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists for the treatment of metabolic disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 23:103–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, GAgabio, RDiaz, GLobina, CReali, RGessa, GLAppetite suppression and weight loss after the cannabinoid antagonist SR 141716. Life Sci 1998; 63:PL1137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaddurah-Daouk, RMcEvoy, JBaillie, RALee, DYao, JKDoraiswamy, PM et al. Metabolomic mapping of atypical antipsychotic effects in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2007; 12:934–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oresic, MTang, JSeppanen-Laakso, TMattila, ISaarni, SESaarni, SI et al. Metabolome in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a general population-based study. Genome Med 2011; 3:19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oresic, MSeppanen-Laakso, TSun, DTang, JTherman, SViehman, R et al. Phospholipids and insulin resistance in psychosis: a lipidomics study of twin pairs discordant for schizophrenia. Genome Med 2012; 4:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, YYu, ZGiegling, IXie, LHartmann, AMPrehn, C et al. Schizophrenia shows a unique metabolomics signature in plasma. Transl Psychiatry 2012; 2:e149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, JBaillie, RAZhu, HBuckley, PKeshavan, MSNasrallah, HA et al. Lipidomics reveals early metabolic changes in subjects with schizophrenia: effects of atypical antipsychotics. PLoS One 2013; 8:e68717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paredes, RMQuinones, MMarballi, KGao, XValdez, CAhuja, SS et al. Metabolomic profiling of schizophrenia patients at risk for metabolic syndrome. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 17:1139–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinones, MPKaddurah-Daouk, RMetabolomics tools for identifying biomarkers for neuropsychiatric diseases. Neurobiol Dis 2009; 35:165–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali-Sisto, TTolmunen, TToffol, EViinamaki, HMantyselka, PValkonen-Korhonen, M et al. Purine metabolism is dysregulated in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016; 70:2532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaddurah-Daouk, RYuan, PBoyle, SHMatson, WWang, ZZeng, ZB et al. Cerebrospinal fluid metabolome in mood disorders-remission state has a unique metabolic profile. Sci Rep 2012; 2:667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, PRAmaral, DGBais, PSmith, AMEgnash, LARoss, ME et al. Metabolomics as a tool for discovery of biomarkers of autism spectrum disorder in the blood plasma of children. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oresic, MHyotylainen, THerukka, SKSysi-Aho, MMattila, ISeppanan-Laakso, T et al. Metabolome in progression to Alzheimer's disease. Transl Psychiatry 2011; 1:e57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, XRozen, SBoyle, SHHellegers, CCheng, HBurke, JR et al. Metabolomics in early Alzheimer's disease: identification of altered plasma sphingolipidome using shotgun lipidomics. PLoS One 2011; 6:e21643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaddurah-Daouk, RRozen, SMatson, WHan, XHulette, CMBurke, JR et al. Metabolomic changes in autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7:309–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trushina, EDutta, TPersson, XMMielke, MMPetersen, RCIdentification of altered metabolic pathways in plasma and CSF in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using metabolomics. PLoS One 2013; 8:e63644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, SSSantosh, WKumar, SChristlet, HTMetabolic profiling of Parkinson's disease: evidence of biomarker from gene expression analysis and rapid neural network detection. J Biomed Sci 2009; 16:63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogdanov, MMatson, WRWang, LMatson, TSaunders-Pullman, RBressman, SS et al. Metabolomic profiling to develop blood biomarkers for Parkinson's disease. Brain 2008; 131:389–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatano, TSaiki, SOkuzumi, AMohney, RPHattori, NIdentification of novel biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease by metabolomic technologies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87:295301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suvitaival, TMantere, OKieseppa, TMattila, IPoho, PHyotylainen, T et al. Serum metabolite profile associates with the development of metabolic co-morbidities in first-episode psychosis. Transl Psychiatry 2016; 6:e951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oresic, MHyotylainen, TKotronen, AGopalacharyulu, PNygren, HArola, J et al. Prediction of non-alcoholic fatty-liver disease and liver fat content by serum molecular lipids. Diabetologia 2013; 56:2266–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luukkonen, PKZhou, YSadevirta, SLeivonen, MArola, JOresic, M et al. Hepatic ceramides dissociate steatosis and insulin resistance in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2016; 64:1167–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brugger, SPHowes, ODHeterogeneity and homogeneity of regional brain structure in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74:1104–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arango, CRapado-Castro, MReig, SCastro-Fornieles, JGonzalez-Pinto, AOtero, S et al. Progressive brain changes in children and adolescents with first-episode psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69:1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahn, WRais, MStigter, FPvan Haren, NECaspers, EHulshoff, HE et al. Psychosis and brain volume changes during the first five years of schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2009; 19:147–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haijma, SVVan Haren, NCahn, WKoolschijn, PCHulshoff Pol, HEKahn, RSBrain volumes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis in over 18 000 subjects. Schizophr Bull 2013; 39:1129–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minichino, AAndo, AFrancesconi, MSalatino, ADelle Chiaie, RCadenhead, KInvestigating the link between drug-naive first episode psychoses (FEPs), weight gain abnormalities and brain structural damages: relevance and implications for therapy. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2017; 77:922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sporns, OTononi, GKotter, RThe human connectome: a structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 2005; 1:e42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fornito, AZalesky, APantelis, CBullmore, ETSchizophrenia, neuroimaging and connectomics. Neuroimage 2012; 62:2296–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hietala, JSyvalahti, EVuorio, KRakkolainen, VBergman, JHaaparanta, M et al. Presynaptic dopamine function in striatum of neuroleptic-naive schizophrenic patients. Lancet 1995; 346:1130–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laruelle, MAbi-Dargham, Avan Dyck, CHGil, RD'Souza, CDErdos, J et al. Single photon emission computerized tomography imaging of amphetamine-induced dopamine release in drug-free schizophrenic subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:9235–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, ODMurray, RMSchizophrenia: an integrated sociodevelopmental-cognitive model. Lancet 2014; 383:1677–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harkany, TGuzman, MGalve-Roperh, IBerghuis, PDevi, LAMackie, KThe emerging functions of endocannabinoid signaling during CNS development. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2007; 28:8392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasuno, FBrown, AKZoghbi, SSKrushinski, JHChernet, ETauscher, J et al. The PET radioligand [11C]MePPEP binds reversibly and with high specific signal to cannabinoid CB1 receptors in nonhuman primate brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33:259–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceccarini, JDe Hert, MVan Winkel, RPeuskens, JBormans, GKranaster, L et al. Increased ventral striatal CB1 receptor binding is related to negative symptoms in drug-free patients with schizophrenia. Neuroimage 2013; 79:304–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, DFKuwabara, HHorti, AGRaymont, VBrasic, JGuevara, M et al. Quantification of cerebral cannabinoid receptors subtype 1 (CB1) in healthy subjects and schizophrenia by the novel PET radioligand [11C]OMAR. Neuroimage 2010; 52:1505–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normandin, MDZheng, MQLin, KSMason, NSLin, SFRopchan, J et al. Imaging the cannabinoid CB1 receptor in humans with [11C]OMAR: assessment of kinetic analysis methods, test-retest reproducibility, and gender differences. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2015; 35:1313–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, GEHirvonen, JLiow, JSZoghbi, SSGladding, RTauscher, JT et al. Imaging and quantitation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in human and monkey brains using (18)F-labeled inverse agonist radioligands. J Nucl Med 2010; 51:112–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terry, GELiow, JSZoghbi, SSHirvonen, JFarris, AGLerner, A et al. Quantitation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in healthy human brain using positron emission tomography and an inverse agonist radioligand. Neuroimage 2009; 48:362–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsujikawa, TZoghbi, SSHong, JDonohue, SRJenko, KJGladding, RL et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of (11)C-SD5024, a novel PET radioligand for human brain imaging of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Neuroimage 2014; 84:733–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranganathan, MCortes-Briones, JRadhakrishnan, RThurnauer, HPlaneta, BSkosnik, P et al. Reduced brain cannabinoid receptor availability in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2016; 79:9971005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leweke, FMGiuffrida, AKoethe, DSchreiber, DNolden, BMKranaster, L et al. Anandamide levels in cerebrospinal fluid of first-episode schizophrenic patients: impact of cannabis use. Schizophr Res 2007; 94:2936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barabasi, A-LNetwork medicine—from obesity to the diseasome. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:404–7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe078114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofree, MShen, JPCarter, HGross, AIdeker, TNetwork-based stratification of tumor mutations. Nat Methods 2013; 10:1108–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galperin, MYFernandez-Suarez, XMThe 2012 nucleic acids research database issue and the online molecular biology database collection. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maier, DKalus, WWolff, MKalko, SGRoca, JMarin de Mas, I et al. Knowledge management for systems biology a general and visually driven framework applied to translational medicine. BMC Syst Biol 2011; 5:38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Losko, SHeumann, KSemantic data integration and knowledge management to represent biological network associations. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 563:241–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosse, CMejino, JL Jr.A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36:478500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desikan, RSSegonne, FFischl, BQuinn, BTDickerson, BCBlacker, D et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006; 31:968–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wishart, DSJewison, TGuo, ACWilson, MKnox, CLiu, Y et al. HMDB 3.0—the human metabolome database in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;2013(41):D8017.Google Scholar
Brown, JARudie, JDBandrowski, AVan Horn, JDBookheimer, SYThe UCLA multimodal connectivity database: a web-based platform for brain connectivity matrix sharing and analysis. Front Neuroinform 2012; 6:28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, FABrede tools and federating online neuroinformatics databases. Neuroinformatics 2014; 12:2737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawrylycz, MJLein, ESGuillozet-Bongaarts, ALShen, EHNg, LMiller, JA et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 2012; 489:391–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattila, JKoikkalainen, JVirkki, ASimonsen, Avan Gils, MWaldemar, G et al. A disease state fingerprint for evaluation of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 27:163–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattila, JKoikkalainen, JVirkki, Avan Gils, MLotjonen, JAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I. Design and application of a generic clinical decision support system for multiscale data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012; 59:234–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Outline of the METSY bioinformatics platform, bridging the systems medicine research approaches with the applications in the clinic. The platform integrates three components: network analysis, semantic modelling and decision support system. (A) Network analysis to integrate heterogeneous data (multi-omics, in vivo molecular neuroimaging, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging and psychosocial) based on partical correlations (example from an earlier study [32]). (B) Semantic modelling to annotate heterogeneous data with biological and literature-based annotations, representing knowledge as network which integrates associations otherwise separated in individual data sources. Integration is based on mapping of equivalentmeaning and objects across all information types relevant in a life science project. (C) Development of a decision support system to facilitate decision-making in the clinic based on multi-modal diagnostic information.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Example of integrative analysis of connectome and gene expression data by using the semantic approach. Coloured dots indicate gene expression values for FKBP5 (taken from Human Allen Brain Atlas). Red colours indicate high expression values whereas blue colours indicate low values. In addition, we selected prefrontal cortex circuitry and display structural and functional connection strengths measured by DTI and fMRI, respectively. Structural connectivity is depicted by line thickness. Red line colouring indicates strong functional connectivity while blue indicates anti-correlated activity between the connected brain areas. Connection strengths are taken from the NKI_AVRG dataset – the average connectivity of all connectomes of the NKI Rockland study from the Human Connectome Project. Datasets available through the USC Multimodal Connectivity Database. All brain coordinates were transformed to a unified coordinate frame specified by the MNI-152 standard brain. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.