Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:00:09.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self-Measure as an Instrument for Diagnostic of Illness Representation in youth with Ultra-High risk for Psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Kovyazina
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Psychology, Moscow, Russia
E. Rasskazova
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University and Mental Health Research Center laboratory of Medical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Moscow, Russia
N. Varako
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Psychology, Moscow, Russia
S. Enikolopov
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University and Mental Health Research Center laboratory of Medical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Pictorial representation of illness and self-measure (PRISM) was developed as screening tool assessing implicit reaction to somatic illnesses. Conclusion is based on comparisons of the positions of illness-related (“Illness” and major symptoms) and unrelated (“Me”, “Family”, “Work/study”) objects on the list.

Objectives

Due to its easiness and implicitness PRISM could be promising addition to illness representation questionnaires in mental illnesses.

Aim was to reveal validity of the PRISM in youth with ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Methods

Eighty-one male patients 16–25 years old meeting criteria of ultra-high risk for psychosis; preliminary diagnoses of mood disorders 34, personality disorders 26, schizotypal disorder 21 patients) filled PRISM, beck cognitive insight scale, symptom checklist 90-r, illness perception questionnaire, quality of life and enjoyment questionnaire and happiness scale.

Results

According to hierarchical regression, conditional “Self-Illness” distance (after control for mean distances on the list) was related to less psychopathological complaints, lower subjective illness severity and emotional representations, higher treatment control and better quality of life. “Self-symptoms” distance was related to better cognitive insight, lower emotional representations and consequences and moderated the relationship between “Self-Illness” distance and appraisals of illness length and dynamic.

Conclusions

Conditional “Self-Illness” distance in PRISM could reflect cognitive appraisal of illness based on symptoms and related to life satisfaction while “Self-Symptoms” distance reflects merely emotional reaction based on cognitive insight.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster Viewing: Research Methodology
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.