Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:12:00.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Part of the solution yet part of the problem” Stigmatization in mental health professionals: characteristics and associated factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

K.-M. Valery ,
A. Prouteau ,
L. Violeau ,
T. Fournier  and
S. Guionnet
K.-M. Valery*
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux, Psychology, Bordeaux, France
A. Prouteau
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux, Psychology, Bordeaux, France
L. Violeau
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux, Psychology, Bordeaux, France
T. Fournier
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux, Psychology, Bordeaux, France
S. Guionnet
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux, Psychology, Bordeaux, France
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The consequences of schizophrenia stigma are numerous and highly damaging to individuals, their families, the health care system and society. Mental health professionals (MHP) are considered to be one of the main sources of schizophrenia stigmatization.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to identify individual and contextual factors associated with stigmatization in MHP in its three dimensions.

Methods

An online survey was conducted with specific measures of MHP stigmatization (stereotypes, prejudices and discrimination). Four categories of potential associated factors were also measured: sociodemographic information, contextual characteristics (e.g. work setting), individual characteristics (e.g. profession, recovery-oriented practices) and theoretical beliefs (e.g. biological beliefs, perceived similarities, continuum beliefs). Models of prediction were computed when applicable.

Results

Responses of 357 MHP were analysed. The main factors associated with stigmatization (stereotypes, prejudice) in MHP are of two types: i) individual beliefs (about mental illness: biological etiological beliefs, categorical beliefs; or about MHP themselves: professional utility beliefs, similarity beliefs) and ii) characteristics of practices (recovery oriented practice, work setting, profession).

Conclusions

These original results suggest new strategies for reducing stigma in mental health practices such as focusing on individual beliefs and fostering recovery-oriented practice and professional utility beliefs.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Keywords

stigmatizationschizophréniamental health professionals
Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 65 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 30th European Congress of Psychiatry , June 2022 , pp. S207
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.