Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:54:47.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paraphrenia - forgotten or undiagnosable psychosis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

E. Lukacs*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania, Târgu Mureș, Romania
A. Nireștean
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania, Târgu Mureș, Romania
A. Sima-Comaniciu
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania, Târgu Mureș, Romania
L. M. Muntean
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania, Târgu Mureș, Romania
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Paraphrenia is a chronic psychosis that has generally lost its status as an independent nosological entity, not being included in DSM-5. From the perspective of the particular psychopathological picture and the impact of the disease on the patient’s functioning in roles, paraphrenia remains a challenge for the clinician in terms of nosological classification and the correct therapeutic approach.

Objectives

We take into account a patient who presents the classic diagnostic criteria of paraphrenia with a clinical and evolutionary picture followed for 15 years, with the aim of bringing the paraphrenic phenomenology back to the fore.

Methods

The case presentation will focus on the richness and absurdity of the delusional ideas that are in great contrast with the good insertion into reality of the subject and the preservation of the core of the personality. We will also describe the main landmarks of positive and differential diagnosis.

Results

We believe that paraphrenia deserves to be differentiated from other psychotic disorders through the particular variant of insight that also explains the significant capacities of dissimulation and as a result of insertion into the roles of life. This attribute also explains the increased potential for danger and unpredictability of the paraphrenic patient.

Conclusions

Our approach is an argument for the psychopathological understanding of paraphrenic psychotic phenomenology independent of different nosographic classification systems. We are trying to contribute to increasing the quality of differential diagnosis in psychoses.

Keywords

psychosis, paraphrenia, differential diagnosis

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.