Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T11:55:45.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P0288 - Predictors for postconcussional disorder after mild traumatic brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A. Lundin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden
C. Deboussard
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden
G. Edman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden
J. Borg
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Medicine, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background and Aims:

Longstanding symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) may be attributable to factors other than the MTBI, pretraumatic as well as posttraumatic factors. A recognised problem when assessing pretraumatic factors is underestimation due to recall bias. The aim of the study was to explore prognostic factors for the development of postconcussional disorder (PCD) after MTBI.

Methods:

In a prospective cohort of MTBI patients, pretraumatic (previous psychiatric disorder, personality traits, coping ability, GAF, psychosocial stressors, medical condition), peritraumatic (duration of loss of consciousness and amnesia, GCS score at presentation, intracranial hemmorhage) and posttraumatic (posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression) factors were thoroughly assessed within one week after the trauma, when recall bias was estimated to be negliable. Outcome (persisting symptoms and disability) was assessed at three months post injury. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the independent contribution to the outcome from different factors.

Results:

Three months post injury, 17 % had postconcussional disorder (PCD). Posttraumatic hyperarousal (OR 9.08), concurrent medical conditions (OR 6.19), female gender (OR 5.54) and psychosocial stressors (OR 11.93) independently predicted PCD, but injury related factors had no significant relation to the outcome.

Conclusions:

Pre- and posttraumatic factors significantly contribute to the long term outcome after MTBI and should be taken into account in the clinical assessment of patients with PCD. The findings support an etiological model that recognises predisposing and perpetuating factors as well as the precipitating head injury as determinants for the development of PCD.

Type
Poster Session III: Miscellaneous
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.