Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T06:43:47.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P02-364 - Efficacy of Ultra-brief Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy in Depressed Inpatients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

J. Rieu
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Hôpital Casselardit, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
E. Bui
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Hôpital Casselardit, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
P. Birmes
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Hôpital Casselardit, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
L. Schmitt
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Hôpital Casselardit, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

Few studies have suggested the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in inpatients suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD). The present study aims at examining the efficacy of Ultra-brief CBT (UCBT) in depressed inpatients.

Methods

Twenty-two patients (age>18) admitted to the psychiatric ward of Toulouse University Hospital for MDD were randomised to receive for two weeks either UCBT (n=11) or treatment as usual (TAU) (n=11). UCBT consisted in 6 sessions of CBT while TAU consisted in supportive sessions. Both types of sessions were performed by psychiatric residents. Both groups also received pharmacological and institutional cares. Primary outcome was depressive symptoms assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the Hamilton Depressive Rating Scale (HDRS) before and after treatment (2 weeks).

Results

There were no differences between the groups on any baseline variables. Mean age was 48.4 (SD=12.7) and 36.4% (n=8) were of male gender. Mean baseline HDRS scores were 23.3(SD=6.3) and 19.3(SD=3.9) and BDI scores were 36.7(SD=12) and 36.1(SD=7.5) for the UCBT and TAU groups respectively. At the end of treatment, mean HDRS scores were 12.3(SD=10.1) and 14.4(SD=7.8) and BDI scores were 18.8(SD=16.8) and 20.6(SD=11.4) for the CBT and TAU groups respectively. Both groups displayed a significant decrease on HDRS and BDI scores (all p< 0.05). An analyse of variance showed an interaction time by group in favour of the UCBT group on HDRS score (F=6.66; p=0.018).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that UCBT might be more efficacious than supportive therapy in depressed inpatients.

Type
Psychotherapy
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.