Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:53:42.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

P01-75 - Quetiapine XR or Lithium Combination with Antidepressants in Treatment Resistant Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

S. Montgomery ,
L. Dell’Osso ,
S. Kasper ,
W. Pitchot ,
E. Dencker-Vansvik ,
J. Köhler ,
L. Jörgensen  and
M. Bauer
S. Montgomery
Affiliation:
Imperial College School of Medicine, University of London, London, UK
L. Dell’Osso
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Neurobiology, Pisa, Italy
S. Kasper
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
W. Pitchot
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
E. Dencker-Vansvik
Affiliation:
AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden
J. Köhler
Affiliation:
AstraZeneca, Wedel
L. Jörgensen
Affiliation:
AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden
M. Bauer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

Compare quetiapine+antidepressant (AD) with lithium+AD, and quetiapine monotherapy with lithium+AD in open, rater-blinded treatment.

Methods

Patients with treatment resistant depression (Thase et al 1997 stage 1 and 2) with severity of MADRS ≥25 received: quetiapine XR 300mg/day plus AD (SSRIs or venlafaxine) (n=229), lithium (monitored to between 0.6 to 1.0 meq/l) plus AD (n=221) or quetiapine XR alone (300mg/day) (n=225) for 6 weeks. Primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in MADRS total score. The pre-specified non-inferiority limit was 3 points on the MADRS.

Results

Fewer patients discontinued on quetiapine+AD (15.2%) than lithium+AD (20.5%) and quetiapine monotherapy (21.5%). Quetiapine+AD and quetiapine monotherapy, were not inferior to lithium+AD in the primary (per protocol) analysis with a mean difference (97.5%CI) on the MADRS of -2.32 (-4.6 to -0.05) favouring add-on quetiapine and -0.97 (-3.24 to 1.31) favouring quetiapine monotherapy. This mandated superiority testing on the modified ITT population showing no significant difference at endpoint.

In a post hoc analysis discounting multiplicity, quetiapine+AD was significantly more effective than lithium+AD on the MADRS change from baseline, p=0.046. The advantage was observed at day 4 (p=0.007) and persisted throughout. Efficacy was supported by CGI-I (p=0.07). Quetiapine+AD showed a numerically greater advantage over lithium+AD in those with two failed treatments (Stage 2) rather than one (Stage 1).

Conclusions

Quetiapine+AD and quetiapine monotherapy, were non-inferior to lithium+AD in treatment resistant depression. There was an early significant and persistent efficacy advantage on MADRS for quetiapine augmentation compared with lithium augmentation of SSRI or venlafaxine treatment.

Type
Affective disorders / Unipolar depression / Bipolar disorder
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 25 , Issue S1: 18th European Congress of Psychiatry. February 27, March 2, 2010 - Munich, Germany , 2010 , 25-E294
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.