No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2020
To compare the effectiveness of a psychoeducational group program and conventional treatment versus individual conventional care in patients with a mild/moderate depression disorder in urban primary healthcare centers (PHCC).
:
randomized controlled trial of two groups.
patients aged 20 years attended in 13 PHCC, identified by general practitioners and nurses with diagnosis of mid/moderate depression disorder (BDI scale) between December 2008 and April 2009.
The intervention group received a psycoeducational group program (12 weeks, two nurses). The program provided health education about the illness, pharmacological treatment, diet, physical exercise, problem solving, and cognitive-behavioral therapy.
The control group received conventional care.
The evolution of patients is monitoring up to 1 year after the inclusion by an individual interview (baseline and 3, 6, 9 months).
The battery of assessment included: Sociodemographic, BDI and EuroQol-5D questionnaires.
241 patients (126 intervention Group (IG); 115 control Group (CG)), 217 women (53% IG and 47%CG) with a mean age of 54, 11 (SD=12,656). 92% Spanish. 45% married. Academic level: 76, 5 % study and 13,5% non-study.
The mean BDI in the baseline GI 21, 66 (SD=6,87) and CG 19.62(SD=6.85), follow up 3 months, GI 13,91(SD=8.22) and CG 17,07(SD=7,930). The mean of EuroQoL in the baseline IG 48, 29 (SD= 17,77) and CG 53,0 (SD= 19,06), follow up 3m, GI 56,57(SD=22,12) and CG 45,28(SD=23,74).
The two groups are comparable for all variables analyzed. There is an improvement in the IG versus CG on depressive symptoms and quality of life.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.