Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:59:37.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission. Satisfaction with treatment and the effect of involuntary admissions on patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

N. Alavi
Affiliation:
Queen's university, department of psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
E. Prost
Affiliation:
Queen's university, department of psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
D. Groll
Affiliation:
Queen's university, department of psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
R. Cardy
Affiliation:
Queen's university, department of psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
N. Mofidi
Affiliation:
Queen's university, department of psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
P. Wang
Affiliation:
Queen's university, department of psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
C. Patel
Affiliation:
Queen's university, department of psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
S. Sajid
Affiliation:
Queen's university, department of psychiatry, Kingston, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Involuntary hospitalization in those presumed to be mentally ill has been a common practice. Although some patients are hospitalized for aggression, two-thirds of the patients are hospitalized because of the threat they pose to themselves. Although these patients require risk assessment and evaluation for possible presence of mental illness, the question is how much these patients will benefit from involuntary admission and what the long-term outcome would be.

Method

All patients admitted involuntary to the psychiatric ward in Kingston, Canada, and psychiatrists involved in their care were interviewed to see whether they think the involuntary admission was helpful. All patients were asked to fill-out MacArthur AES to assess their satisfaction with hospitalization.

Results

Although psychiatrists frequently reported that the admission was justified, only 29 out of 81 patients reported being explained to why they had been admitted involuntarily. Also, there was a significant difference in AES scores between those who were and were not given an explanation for admission. In addition, psychiatrists more often reported that the involuntary admission worsened the therapeutic relationship which was significantly associated with involuntary admission that was not explained to patients.

Discussion

The results of our study shows that patients admitted involuntarily often feel disappointed with staff and mental health system. It could lead to feeling of hopelessness, frustration and low self-esteem. If explained, some patients who present with risk to self might accept voluntary admissions, that will improve therapeutic alliance with psychiatrists and increase satisfaction from hospitalization. Result of this study could improve the decision making process for involuntary admissions.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster Walk: Ethics and psychiatry/Philosophy and psychiatry/Others–Part 1
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.