Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:34:49.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Outcomes of a community-based wellness screening tool administered by mental health professionals and religious leaders in the Ketu South Municipality in Ghana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

R. P. F. Wolthusen*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States On The Move e.V., Dresden, Germany
P. Andrä
Affiliation:
University Children Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Ghanaian community members with mental health conditions are usually not identified until their families cannot handle their care at home anymore, for example, due to mistrust in medical institutions. From community-based and global mental health research, we know why we should act (for example, early interventions improve the treatment outcomes) and what we should do (for example, task-sharing in community settings). How any of these activities can be implemented on the community level to decrease the delay of access to evidence-based care remains unclear.

Objectives

The study explored the “how” for a specific identified problem (collaboration between mental health professionals and religious leaders) in the Ketu South Municipality in Ghana; additionally, the study explored the feasibilty and the results of a community-based wellness screening.

Methods

We used a human-centered design approach to tackle this challenge in the Ketu South Municipality in Ghana. We invited 80 mental health professionals, religious leaders, and service users to participate in this exercise. The participants innovated the so-called Brain Spirit Desk, which builds collaboration between mental health professionals and religious leaders. The participants also designed a 9-question wellness screening tool, including four validated screening scales in Ghana: PHQ-2, GAD-2, one question about suicidality, and CAGE-AID. The participating religious leaders were trained to use this screening tool and administer it by themselves or allow mental health professionals to administer it in their respective institutions. Referral pathways were established for community members who screened positive on the wellness screening tool.

Results

1065 community members (787 females, 278 males, mean age: 32.42 years) were screened using the wellness screening tool over five months (January - May 2022); 215 of these community members were already connected to mental health clinics in hospitals. 60 community members out of 203 who screened positive on the PHQ-2 were not receiving treatment at the time of screening and were referred for further assessment and treatment. Another 52, 53, and 142 community members were referred for further evaluation and treatment based on their answers to the GAD-2, suicidality, and CAGE-AID screening questions, respectively. Completed referrals across conditions averaged around 55%.

Conclusions

Our activities explored, guided through principles of a human-centered design approach, how the delay in access to evidence-based mental health care in the Ketu South Municipality in Ghana can be decreased through a collaborative effort of mental health professionals and religious leaders. A developed screening tool identified potential cases of mental health conditions. Importantly, religious leaders’ involvement and endorsement built trust in the activities.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.