Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:56:29.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

One-year outcome of low-intensity booster sessions versus care as usual in psychosis patients after a short-term psychoeducational intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Ingrid Sibitz ,
Michaela Amering ,
Ralf Gössler ,
Annemarie Unger  and
Heinz Katschnig
Ingrid Sibitz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, A-1090Vienna, Austria Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Social Psychiatry, Vienna, Austria
Michaela Amering*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, A-1090Vienna, Austria
Ralf Gössler
Affiliation:
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Social Psychiatry, Vienna, Austria
Annemarie Unger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, A-1090Vienna, Austria
Heinz Katschnig
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, A-1090Vienna, Austria Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Social Psychiatry, Vienna, Austria
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +43 1 40400 3546; fax: +43 1 40400 3605. E-mail address:[email protected] (M. Amering).
Get access

Abstract

Objective

In this study we aimed to evaluate long-term effects of a community-based, quality of life oriented psychoeducational intervention for schizophrenia with and without booster sessions.

Method

One hundred and three outpatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder completed a 9-week psychoeducational programme. At the end of the programme groups were block-randomised to either an extension programme comprising monthly booster sessions for a further nine months (booster condition) or routine clinical care with no further group meetings (non-booster condition). Outcome measures were applied before and after the seminar and at 6 and 12 months.

Results

Positive effects were observed after the short-term 9-week programme with regard to symptoms, knowledge about the illness, illness concept, control convictions and quality of life. These effects were retained over the 12-month period in both conditions. The only relevant difference between the booster and the non-booster conditions concerned external control convictions.

Conclusion

Overall this 9-week programme has shown encouraging effects still present at 12 months after baseline independent of booster or non-booster conditions. Further studies are needed to explore whether a subgroup of patients, those with impaired neurocognitive and social functioning, can benefit significantly from booster sessions.

Keywords

SchizophreniaPsychoeducationQuality of lifeBooster sessionsFollow-up study
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , May 2007 , pp. 203 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amering, A.Sibitz, I.Gössler, R.Katschnig, H.Wissen—genießen—besser leben. Ein Seminar für Menschen mit Psychoseerfahrung. Bonn: Psychiatrie-Verlag, http://www.verlag.psychiatrie.de/buecher/ebooks/; 2002. Elektronisches Buch.Google Scholar
Andres, K.Pfammatter, M.Fries, A.Brenner, H.D.The significance of coping as a therapeutic variable for the outcome of psychological therapy in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2003;18:149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J.M.Coia, D.A.Harper Gilmour, H.Harper, J.P.The impact of education groups for people with schizophrenia on social functioning and quality of life. Br J Psychiatry 1996;168:199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awad, A.G.Antipsychotic medications: compliance and attitudes towards treatment. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2004;17:75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäuml, J.Pitschel-Walz, G.Kissling, W.Psychoedukative Gruppen bei schizophrenen Psychosen: Spezifische Auswirkungen eines bifokalen Ansatzes auf Krankheitsbewältigung und Rezidivraten im 4-Jahreszeitraum. Ergebnisse der Münchner PIP-Studie. In: Dittmar, V.Klein, H.E.Schön, D., editors. Die Behandlung schizophrener Menschen. Integrative Therapiemodelle und ihre Wirksamkeit. Regensburg: S. Roderer Verlag; 1997. p. 169–195.Google Scholar
Bechdolf, A.Köhn, D.Knost, B.Schiller, S.Klosterkötter, J.Hambrecht, M.et al.A randomized comparison of group cognitive-behavioural therapy and group psychoeducation in acute patients with schizophrenia: outcome at 24 months. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005;112:173–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobes, J.Garcia-Portilla, P.Saiz, P.A.Bascaran, T.Bousono, M.Quality of life measures in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2005;20(Suppl. 3):S313–S317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böker, W.Brenner, H.D.Genner, R., editors. Towards a comprehensive therapy for schizophrenia. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber; 1997.Google Scholar
Brenner, H.D.Pfammatter, M.Psychological therapy in schizophrenia: what is the evidence? Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000;102(Suppl. 407):1997. p. 74–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byerly, M.Fisher, R.Carmody, T.Rush, A.J.A trial of compliance therapy in outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:997–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colom, F.Lam, D.Psychoeducation: improving outcomes in bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2005;20:359–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, J.C.Bentall, R.P.Roberts, C.Randall, F.Rogers, A.Cattell, D.et al.Attitudes toward antipsychotic medication. The impact of clinical variables and relationships with health professionals. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:717–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drake, R.E.Mueser, K.T.Torrey, W.C.Miller, A.L.Lehman, A.F.Bond, G.R.et al.Evidence-based treatment of schizophrenia. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2000;2:393–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J.Leucht, S.Kissling, W.Shared decision making in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003;107:403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiller, W.Zaudig, M.Mombour, W.IDCL/ICD 10 International Diagnostic Checklists. IDCL Internationale Diagnosen Checklisten für ICD-10 und DSM-IV. Bern: Verlag Huber; 1995.Google Scholar
Hogan, T.P.Awad, A.G.Eastwood, R.A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenia: reliability and discriminative ability. Psychol Med 1983;13:177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, W.P.Kieserg, A.Feldmann, R.Buchkremer, G.Psychoeducational training for schizophrenic patients: background, procedure and empirical findings. Patient Educ Counsel 1996;29:257–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornung, W.P.Klingberg, S.Feldmann, R.Schonauer, K.Schulze Mönking, H.Collaboration with drug treatment by schizophrenic patients with and without psychoeducational training: results of a 1-year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1998;97:213–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaeger, J.Bitter, I.Czobor, P.Volavka, J.The measurement of subjective experience in schizophrenia: The Subjective Deficit Syndrome Scale. Compr Psychiatry 1990;31(3):216–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janè-Llopis, E.Katschnig, H.Improving quality of life through mental health promotion. In: Katschnig, H.Freeman, H.Sartorius, N., editors. Quality of life in mental disorders. 2nd ed.Chichester New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006. p. 331–342.Google Scholar
Katschnig, H.Freeman, H.Sartorius, N., editors. Quality of life in mental disorders. 2nd ed.Chichester New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.Google ScholarPubMed
Kay, S.R.Fiszbein, A.Opler, L.A.The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1987;13(2):2006. p. 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, R.Kirov, G.Everitt, B.Hayward, P.David, A.Randomised controlled trial of compliance therapy. 18-month follow-up. Br J Psychiatry 1998;172:413–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopelowicz, A.Liberman, R.P.Integrating treatment with rehabilitation for persons with major mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv 2003;54:1491–1498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krampen, G.FKK, Fragebogen zu Kompetenz- und Kontrollüberzeugungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1991.Google Scholar
Linden, M.Nather, J.Wilms, H.U.Zur Definition, Bedeutung und Messung der Krankheitskonzepte von Patienten. Die Krankheitskonzeptskala (KK-Skala) für schizophrene Patienten. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1988;56:35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohaus, A.Schmitt, G.M.KKG, Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Kontrollüberzeugungen zu Krankheit und Gesundheit. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1989.Google Scholar
Martindale, B.Bateman, A.Crowe, M.Marginson, F., editors. Psychosis. Psychological approaches and their effectiveness. London: Gaskell; 2000.Google Scholar
Mezzich, J.E.Ruiperez, M.A.Perez, C.Yoon, G.Liu, J.Mahmud, S.The Spanish version of the quality of life index. presentation and validation. J Nerv Ment Dis 2000;188(5):2000. p. 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueser, K.T.Bellack, A.S.Wade, J.H.Sayers, S.L.Rosenthal, C.K.The assessment of the educational needs of chronic psychiatric patients and their relatives. Br J Psychiatry 1992;160:674–680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueser, K.T.Corrigan, P.W.Hilton, D.W.Tanzman, B.Schaub, A.Gingerich, S.et al.Illness management and recovery: a review of the research. Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:1272–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, C.Donohoe, G.Sharkey, L.Owens, N.Migone, M.Harries, R.et al.Compliance therapy: a randomised controlled trial in schizophrenia. BMJ 2003;327(7419):834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paley, G.Shapiro, D.A.Lessons from psychotherapy research for psychological interventions for people with schizophrenia. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract 2002;75:5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pekkala, E.Merinder, L.Psychoeducation for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002 CD002831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitschel-Walz, G.Bäuml, J.Bender, W.Engel, R.R.Wagner, M.Kissling, W.Psychoeducation and compliance in the treatment of schizophrenia: results of the Munich Psychosis Information Project Study. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67:443–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rummel, C.B.Hansen, W.P.Helbig, A.Pitschel-Walz, G.Kissling, W.Peer-to-peer psychoeducation in schizophrenia: a new approach. J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:1580–1585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibitz, I.Katschnig, H.Gössler, R.Amering, M.“Wissen—genießen—besser leben”—Ein Seminar für Psychoseerfahrene zur Verbesserung der Lebensqualität und Verringerung der Verletzlichkeit. Psychiatr Prax 2006;33(4):170–176 (in German).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibitz, I.Amering, M.Gössler, R.Unger, A.Katschnig, H.How patients view psychoeducational groups: a qualitative study, Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Ueland, T.Rund, B.R.Cognitive remediation for adolescents with early onset psychosis: a 1-year follow-up study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005;111:193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whisman, M.A.The efficacy of booster maintenance sessions in behavior therapy: review and methodological critique. Clin Psychol Rev 1990;10:155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, K.Watanabe, K.Nemoto, N.Fujita, H.Chikaraishi, C.Yamauchi, K.et al.Prediction of medication noncompliance in outpatients with schizophrenia: 2-year follow-up study. Psychiatry Res 2006;141:61–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zygmunt, A.Olfson, M.Boyer, C.A.Mechanic, D.Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1653–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.