Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:48:03.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Object alternation test—is it sensitive enough to detect cognitive dysfunction in obsessive–compulsive disorder?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Anne Katrin Kuelz ,
Dieter Riemann ,
Roland Zahn  and
Ulrich Voderholzer
Anne Katrin Kuelz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Dieter Riemann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Roland Zahn
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Ulrich Voderholzer*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum of the Albert-Ludwig-University, Hauptstrasse 5, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. Email addresses:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A computerized version of the object alternation test (OAT) was employed in unmedicated obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) patients and matched healthy controls. OCD patients performed normally on the OAT but scored below controls on a task assessing visuo-spatial working memory. The results challenge the concept of the OAT as a sensitive instrument for orbitofrontal dysfunction in OCD.

Keywords

OrbitofrontalSet shifting tasksObsessive–compulsive disorderNeuropsychological testsCognitive performanceMemory
Type
Short communication
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 19 , Issue 7 , November 2004 , pp. 441 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbruzzese, M, Ferri, S, Scarone, S. The selective breakdown of frontal functions in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder and in patients with schizophrenia: a double dissociation experimental finding. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:907–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aycicegi, A, Dinn, WM, Harris, CL, Erkmen, H. Neuropsychological function in obsessive–compulsive disorder: effects of comorbid conditions on task performance. Eur Psychiatry 2003;18:241–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deckersbach, T, Otto, MW, Savage, CR, Baer, L, Jenike, MA. The relationship between semantic organization and memory in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychother Psychosom 2000;69:101–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, M. Object alternation and orbitofrontal system dysfunction in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Brain Cogn 1990;14:134–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, M, Black, S, Ebert, P, Binns, M. Orbitofrontal function, object alternation and perseveration. Cereb Cortex 1998;8:18–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greisberg, S, McKay, D. Neuropsychology of obsessive–compulsive disorder: a review and treatment implications. Clin Psychol Rev 2003;23:95–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuelz, AK, Hohagen, F, Voderholzer, U. Neuropsychological performance in obsessive–compulsive disorder: a critical review. Biol Psychol 2004;65:185–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, JS, Kim, JJ, Lee, DW, et al. Neural correlates of clinical symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res 2003;122:37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehrl, S. Der Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest. Manual zum MWT-B. Erlangen: Straube; 1992.Google Scholar
Mataix-Cols, D, Alonso, P, Pifarre, J, Menchon, J, Vallejo, J. Neuropsy-chological performance in medicated vs. unmedicated patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res 2002;109:255–64.Google Scholar
Mishkin, M, Vest, B, Waxler, M, Rosvold, HE. A re-examination of the effects of frontal lesions on object alternation. Neuropsychologia 1969;7:357–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, S, Fricke, S, Hand, I. Further evidence for delayed alternation deficits in obsessive compulsive disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 2001;189: 562–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxena, S, Rauch, SL. Functional neuroimaging and the neuroanatomy of obsessive–compulsive disorder. Pediatr Clin North Am 2000;23: 563–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T. Specific impairments of planning. Philos Trans R Soc B 1982;98:199–209.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.