Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-22T14:50:26.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-invasive brain stimulation and cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression: systematic review and meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

J. Mutz*
Affiliation:
1King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
M. Kiebs
Affiliation:
2University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Non-invasive brain stimulation protocols are effective treatments for depressive episodes. Although the cognitive adverse effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are well documented, evidence regarding the cognitive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is mixed.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to synthesize research on the cognitive effects of non-invasive brain stimulation protocols and to differentiate between studies of major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar depression and mixed populations.

Methods

Following a systematic literature search of multiple electronic databases, a series of meta-analyses were conducted to estimate standardized mean differences (SMD) between pre- and post-treatment cognitive functioning across nine cognitive domains. Where possible, SMDs were estimated separately for MDD, bipolar depression and mixed populations. In studies that included both patients with MDD and bipolar depression, the percentage of patients with a diagnosis of bipolar depression was tested as a potential moderator.

Results

More than 150 treatment arms were included in the analyses. For ECT, we observed a small decline in language functioning and a decrease in autobiographical memory scores. There was no evidence of pre-post differences across other cognitive domains. For rTMS and tDCS, small to moderate cognitive improvements were observed for several cognitive domains, for example for executive functioning. Across most analyses, between-study heterogeneity was high and could not be accounted for by differences between MDD, bipolar depression or mixed populations.

Conclusions

There was limited evidence that differentiation between studies of MDD, bipolar depression and mixed populations accounted for between-study heterogeneity in analyses of pre-post differences in cognitive functioning. Given that most studies included both patients with MDD and bipolar depression, this finding should be treated as preliminary. Across all the treatment protocols examined, more data are needed to investigate the cognitive effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in patients with bipolar depression.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.