Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:39:04.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negative social comparisons and psychosis proneness in a healthy adolescent population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

F.A. Cotier  and
T. Toulopoulou
F.A. Cotier
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, the University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China
T. Toulopoulou*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, the University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China Department of Psychology, Bilkent University, Main Campus, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny ParkLondonSE5 8AF, UK
*
* Corresponding author. Department of Psychology, Bilkent University, Main Campus, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey. Fax: +90 312 266 49 60. E-mail address:[email protected] (T. Toulopoulou).
Get access

Abstract

There is growing evidence of an association between negative social comparisons (NSC) and both psychosis, and psychosis proneness. The majority of the work thus far, however, has focused largely on one type of NSC, namely, social rank. Whilst social rank is clearly an important factor, an individual's perception of belonging is likely also of importance; particularly, when considering individuals from collectivistic cultures such as China, where greater emphasis is placed on fitting into the group. There is also limited research investigating what factors may contribute towards the relationship between NSC and psychosis proneness, and to what extent this relationship may be due to common familial factors. To address these issues, we examined whether (1) Social rank and perceived belonging predict negative, positive and depressive psychotic experiences in a Chinese, adolescent, twin and sibling population, (2) coping styles moderate the impact of these relationships and (3), there is a familial association between NSC and psychosis proneness. Both social rank and perceived belonging were found to predict the negative and depressive dimensions of psychosis. These relationships were moderated by problem-focused coping styles. Interestingly, the association between perception of belonging, and negative psychotic experiences was familial—and stronger in Monozygotic twins—indicating perhaps shared aetiology due to common genes. Our findings highlight NSC as potential vulnerability markers for negative and depressive psychotic experiences, and suggest potentially different aetiological pathways amongst different NSC and different psychotic experiences. On a clinical level, our findings emphasize the need to consider coping styles when treating at-risk individuals.

Keywords

Social rankGroup-fitBelongingPsychosisTwins
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 46 , October 2017 , pp. 51 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gilbert, PAllan, SThe role of defeat and entrapment (arrested flight) in depression: an exploration of an evolutionary view. Psychol Med 1998;28:585–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selten, JPCantor-Graae, ESocial defeat: risk factor for schizophrenia?. Br J Psychiatry 2005;187:101–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, PEMcBride, OSteel, CKuipers, ERadavanovic, MBrugha, T, et al.The structure of paranoia in the general population. Br J Psychiatry 2013;202:419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, DGarety, PABebbington, PESmith, BRollinson, RFowler, D, et al.Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population. Br J Psychiatry 2005;186:427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birchwood, MGilbert, PGilbert, JTrower, PMeaden, AHay, J, et al.Interpersonal and role-related schema influence the relationship with the dominant ‘voice’ in schizophrenia: a comparison of three models. Psychol Med 2004;34:1571–1580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birchwood, MMeaden, ATrower, PGilbert, PPlaistow, JThe power and omnipotence of voices: subordination and entrapment by voices and significant others. Psychol Med 2000;30:337–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, PBirchwood, MGilbert, JTrower, PHay, JMurray, B, et al.An exploration of evolved mental mechanisms for dominant and subordinate behaviour in relation to auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia and critical thoughts in depression. Psychol Med 2001;31:1117–1127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, DNicole, ELister, RAntley, ADunn, GSlater, MHeight, social comparison, and paranoia: an immersive virtual reality experimental study. Psychiatry Res 2014;218:348–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaya, ESAscone, LLincoln, TMSocial adversity and psychosis: the mediating role of cognitive vulnerability. Schizophr Bull 2016;43:557–565.Google Scholar
Fowler, DHodgekins, JGarety, PFreeman, DKuipers, EDunn, G, et al.Negative cognition, depressed mood, and paranoia: a longitudinal pathway analysis using structural equation modeling. Schizophr Bull 2012;38:1063–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allan, SGilbert, PA Social Comparison Scale: psychometric properties and relationship to psychopathology. Pers Individual Differences 1995;19:293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfundmair, MAydin, NDu, HYeung, SFrey, DGraupmann, VExclude me if you can: cultural effects on the outcomes of social exclusion. J Cross Cult Psychol 2014;46:579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascone, LJaya, ESLincoln, TMThe effect of unfavourable and favourable social comparisons on paranoid ideation: an experimental study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2016;56:97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalbrzikowski, MSugar, CAZinberg, JBachman, PCannon, TDBearden, CECoping styles of individuals at clinical high risk for developing psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry 2012;8:68–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melo, SSBentall, RPCoping in subclinical paranoia: a two nations study. Psychol Psychother 2010;83:407–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, LJEdwards, JMcMurray, NFrancey, SComparison of experiences of stress and coping between young people at risk of psychosis and a non-clinical cohort. Behav Cogn Psychother 2012;40:69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuldberg, DKarwacki, SBBurns, GLStress, coping, and social support in hypothetically psychosis prone subjects. Psychol Rep 1996;78:1267–1283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zong, JGChan, RCStone, WSHsi, XCao, XYZhao, Q, et al.Coping flexibility in young adults: comparison between subjects with and without schizotypal personality features. Schizophr Res 2010;122:185–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folkman, SLazarus, RSIf it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. J Pers Soc Psychol 1985;48:150–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compas, BEConnor-Smith, JKSaltzman, HThomsen, AHWadsworth, MECoping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychol Bull 2001;127:87–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muris, PMayer, BReinders, EWesenhagen, CPerson-related protective and vulnerability factors of psychopathology symptoms in non-clinical adolescents. Community Ment Health J 2009;47:47–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macdonald, EMElspeth, MPica, SMcdonald, SHayes, RLBaglioni, AJ Jr.Stress and coping in early psychosis: role of symptoms, self-efficacy, and social support in coping with stress. Br J Psychiatry 1998;172:122–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raevuori, ADick, DKeski-Rahkonen A, Pulkkinen, LRose, RJRissanen, A, et al.Genetic and environmental factors affecting self-esteem from age 14 to 17: a longitudinal study of Finnish twins. Psychol Med 2007;37:1625–1633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lataster, TWichers, MJacobs, NMengelers, RDerom, CThiery, E, et al.Does reactivity to stress cosegregate with subclinical psychosis? A general population twin study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2008;119:45–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperber, ADTranslation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology 2004;126:S124–S128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark, WToulopoulou, TValidation of the Chinese version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) in an adolescent population. Asian J Psychiatry 2017;26:58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanis, NCHanssen, MSmirins, NK, et al.Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population. Psychol Med 2002;32:347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, WToulopoulou, TPsychometric properties of “community assessment of psychic experiences”: review and meta-analyses. Schizophr Bull 2016;42:34–44.Google Scholar
Lincoln, TMMehl, SKesting, MLRief, WNegative symptoms and social cognition: identifying targets for psychological interventions. Schizophr Bull 2011;37:S23–S32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, PAllan, SBrough, SMelley, SMiles, JNVRelationship of anhedonia and anxiety to social rank, defeat and entrapment. J Affect Disord 2002;71:141–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myin-Germeys, Ivan Os, JStress reactivity in psychosis: evidence for an affective pathway to psychosis. Clin Psychol Rev 2007;27:409–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuechterlein, KHDawson, MEVentura, JGitlin, MSubotnik, KLSnyder, KS, et al.The vulnerability/stress model of schizophrenic relapse: a longitudinal study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994;89:58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreurs, PJGVan de Willige, GTellegen, BBrosschot, JFHerziene handleiding Utrechtse Coping Lijst (UCL) Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, B.V; 1993Google Scholar
Turner, HBryant-Waugh, RPeveler, RBucks, RSA psychometric evaluation of an English version of the Utrecht Coping List. Eur Eating Disord Rev 2012;20:339–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.