Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:34:26.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling the effect of minor orthopaedic day surgery on patient mood at the early post-operative period: A prospective population-based cohort study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Evangelia M. Tsapakis
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital & Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, LondonSE5 8AF, UK
Eleftherios Tsiridis*
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds General Infirmary, Clarendon Wing A, Great George Street, LeedsLS1 3EX, UK
Alistair Hunter
Affiliation:
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, The Whittington Hospital, University College London, LondonN19 5NF, UK
Zakareya Gamie
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds General Infirmary, Clarendon Wing A, Great George Street, LeedsLS1 3EX, UK
Nikolaos Georgakarakos
Affiliation:
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, The Whittington Hospital, University College London, LondonN19 5NF, UK
Panos Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, The Whittington Hospital, University College London, LondonN19 5NF, UK
Constantin Schizas
Affiliation:
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, The Whittington Hospital, University College London, LondonN19 5NF, UK
Robert M. West
Affiliation:
Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9NL, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +44 0113 3922621. E-mail address: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Objective

The effect of minor orthopaedic day surgery (MiODS) on patient’s mood.

Methods

A prospective population-based cohort study of 148 consecutive patients with age above 18 and less than 65, an American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score of 1, and the requirement of general anaesthesia (GA) were included. The Medical Outcomes Study – Short Form 36 (SF-36), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used pre- and post-operatively.

Results

The mean physical component score of SF-36 before surgery was 45.3 (SD = ±10.1) and 8 weeks following surgery was 44.9 (SD = ±11.04) [n = 148, p = 0.51, 95% CI = (−1.03 to 1.52)]. For the measurement of the changes in mood using BDI, BAI and SF-36, latent construct modelling was employed to increase validity. The covariance between mood pre- and post-operatively (cov = 69.44) corresponded to a correlation coefficient, r = 0.88 indicating that patients suffering a greater number of mood symptoms before surgery continue to have a greater number of symptoms following surgery. When the latent mood constructs were permitted to have different means the model fitted well with χ2 (df = 1) = 0.86 for which p = 0.77, thus the null hypothesis that MiODS has no effect on patient mood was rejected.

Conclusions

MiODS affects patient mood which deteriorates at 8 weeks post-operatively regardless of the pre-operative patient mood state. More importantly patients suffering a greater number of mood symptoms before MiODS continue to have a greater number of symptoms following surgery.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayers, D.C., Franklin, P.D., Trief, P.M., Ploutz-Snyder, R., Freund, D.Psychological attributes of preoperative total joint replacement patients: implications for optimal physical outcome. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:125130Google ScholarPubMed
Blumenthal, J.A., Lett, H.S., Babyak, M.A., White, W., Smith, P.K., Mark, D.B.Depression as a risk factor for mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. Lancet 2003;362:604609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollen, K.A.Structural equation models with latent variables 1989; Wiley New YorkGoogle Scholar
Brander, V., Gondek, S., Martin, E., Stulberg, S.D.Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;464:2126Google ScholarPubMed
Brewer, B.W., Cornelius, A.E., Sklar, J.H., Van Raalte, J.L., Tennen, H., Armeli, S.et al.Pain and negative mood during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a daily process analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006;Google Scholar
Coll, A.M., Ameen, J.Profiles of pain after day surgery: patients' experiences of three different operation types. J Adv Nurs 2006;53:178187Google ScholarPubMed
Department of Health. Hospital Episode Statistics. London: Department of Health. Available from: <http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=889>; 2007;;+2007;>Google Scholar
Department of Health The NHS plan: a plan for reform, a plan for investment 2000; HMSO Available from: <http://www.rcgp.org.uk/pdf/ISS_SUMM00_07.pdf>>Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J.B., Houx, P.J., Jolles, J.Cognition after major surgery in the elderly: test performance and complaints. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:867874Google ScholarPubMed
Engbaek, J., Bartholdy, J., Hjortso, N.C.Return hospital visits and morbidity within 60 days after day surgery: a retrospective study of 18,736 day surgical procedures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006;50:911919Google ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, J.Psychosomatic aspects of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A prospective study of 101 male patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1988;340:1112Google ScholarPubMed
Fydrich, T., Dowdall, D., Chambless, D.L.Reliability and validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory. J Anxiety Disord 1992;6:5561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobby, J.L., Venkatesh, R., Motkur, P.The effect of psychological disturbance on symptoms, self-reported disability and surgical outcome in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:196200Google ScholarPubMed
Hofer, C.K., Zollinger, A., Buchi, S., Klaghofer, R., Serafino, D., Bühlmann, S.et al.Patient well-being after general anaesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled multi-centre trial comparing intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2003;91:631637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, J.O., Hendrata, M.V., Myles, P.S.Quality of life 12 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung 2000;29:401411Google ScholarPubMed
Lingard, E.A., Katz, J.N., Wright, E.A., Sledge, C.B.Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:21792186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHorney, C.A., Ware, J.E. Jr.Raczek, A.E.The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247263Google ScholarPubMed
McKhann, G.M., Borowicz, L.M., Goldsborough, M.A., Enger, C., Selnes, O.A.Depression and cognitive decline after coronary artery bypass grafting. Lancet 1997;349:12821284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mergl, R., Seidscheck, I., Allgaier, A.K., Möller, H.J., Hegerl, U., Henkel, V.Depressive, anxiety, and somatoform disorders in primary care: prevalence and recognition. Depress Anxiety 2007;24:185195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrey, M.A., Stuart, M.J., Smith, A.M., Wiese-Bjornstal, D.M.A longitudinal examination of athletes' emotional and cognitive responses to anterior cruciate ligament injury. Clin J Sport Med 1999;9:6369Google ScholarPubMed
O’Hara, M.W., Ghoneim, M.M., Hinrichs, J.V., Mehta, M.P., Wright, E.J.Psychological consequences of surgery. Psychosom Med 1989;51:356370Google ScholarPubMed
Orbell, S., Espley, A., Johnston, M., Rowley, D.Health benefits of joint replacement surgery for patients with osteoarthritis: prospective evaluation using independent assessments in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:564570Google ScholarPubMed
Palmer, R.F., Graham, J.W., Taylor, B., Tatterson, J.Construct validity in health behavior research: interpreting latent variable models involving self-report and objective measures. J Behav Med 2002;25:525550CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, P., Werner, J., Heerlein, A., Kraus, A., Sauer, H.On the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory. A review. Psychopathology 1998;31:160168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberger, P.H., Jokl, P., Ickovics, J.Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:397405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothenhausler, H.B., Grieser, B., Nollert, G., Reichart, B., Schelling, G., Kapfhammer, H.P.Psychiatric and psychosocial outcome of cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective 12-month follow-up study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2005;27:1828CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Surgeons of England Guidelines for day case surgery 1992; Commission on the Provision of Surgical Services, Royal College of SurgeonsGoogle Scholar
Saklad, M.Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 1941;2:281285Google Scholar
Salmon, P., Hall, G.M., Peerbhoy, D.Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: patients' perspective on pain, function, quality of life, and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:360366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slover, J., Abdu, W.A., Hanscom, B., Weinstein, J.N.The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery. Spine 2006;31:19741980CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A.F., Pittaway, A.J. Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; CD002192Google Scholar
Timberlake, N., Klinger, L., Smith, P., Venn, G., Treasure, T., Harrison, M.et al.Incidence and patterns of depression following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Psychosom Res 1997;43:197207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trief, P.M., Ploutz-Snyder, R., Fredrickson, B.E.Emotional health predicts pain and function after fusion: a prospective multicenter study. Spine 2006;31:823830Google ScholarPubMed
Vogele, C., Steptoe, A.Physiological and subjective stress responses in surgical patients. J Psychosom Res 1986;30:205215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.