Mental health needs of heart and lung transplant recipients in Ireland using the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) tool

Abstract

Introduction

International guidelines recommend that prospective organ transplant patients receive a psychosocial assessment to optimise outcomes. There is limited consensus regarding the criteria for psychosocial evaluation. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) tool was developed to enhance the pre-transplant psychosocial workup. The Mater Hospital is the National Centre for heart and lung transplantation in Ireland. The consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) service provides screening of pre-transplant candidates using a biopsychosocial assessment, SIPAT and cognitive screening tools. Post-transplant patients are reviewed on a referral basis.

Objectives

To identify the psychosocial needs of heart and lung transplant recipients and CLP service input over a one year period.

Methods

A review of all heart and lung transplant recipients between January 1^st and December 31^st 2021 was conducted. The following data were recorded: demographics, pre-existing mental illness, SIPAT scores, and referral to the CLP service within six months of transplantation.

Results

Twenty-eight individuals received a heart/lung transplant in 2021 (7 heart, 19 lung, 1 heart &liver, 1 heart & lung). Prior to transplant 50% (14/28) had a pre-existing mental health diagnosis, 7% (2/28) had attended a psychiatrist, and 28.6% (8/28) were on psychotropic medication. SIPAT scores were available for 20 patients. The overall mean SIPAT score was 10.8 (SD 6.1). The subscales were as follows: Patient Readiness, mean 3.2 (SD 1.7); Social Support System, mean 2.1 (SD: 1.8); Psychological Stability & Psychopathology, mean 1.6 (SD 2.7); and Lifestyle & Substance Misuse, mean 3 (SD 1.5). Based on SIPAT scores, 20% (4/20) were excellent candidates, 75% (15/20) were good candidates and 1 (1/20) was minimally acceptable. Pre-existing mental illness was associated with higher total SIPAT scores (p=0.013) and higher scores on the psychological stability subscale (p=0.032). Post-transplant, 50% (14/28) were referred for psychological support and 21.4% (6/28) were referred to the CLP service. A further 10.7% (n=3) were attending CLP prior to transplant. Referrals to CLP occurred (median) 13 days (range 1-275) post-transplant surgery. The reasons for attending CLP were anxiety (5/9), delirium (3/9) and mood (1/9).

Conclusions

SIPAT can be a valuable tool for use in the pre-transplant workup to help identify those that will require intensive psychosocial support post- transplant.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared