No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The magic list of everyday problems in consultation-liaison psychiatry (and hints for solving them)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2020
Abstract
Consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) deals with clinical, research and training activities at the interface between psychiatry and the rest of medicine. The main clinical competencies of CLP include medical-psychiatric comorbidity (co-existing psychiatric and non-psychiatric disorders affecting reciprocally); medically unexplained physical symptoms, “somatization” and functional disorders; and liaison activities, addressed to medical workers and teams.
To describe and discuss typical clinical scenarios that CL psychiatrists have to work in, and suggest effective, evidence-based solutions.
Long-standing everyday clinical experience of the authors combined to evidence derived from international literature consented to create a list of the most common and complex problems or difficulties typical of the CLP clinical context, and related possible solutions.
Most common/complex problems include the following: stigma and prejudice (of patients, relatives, colleagues, and own); excessive technicality of language; short/unpredictable duration of hospital stay of patients, and more in general pressure in clinical practice due to shortness of time and resources; tendency of colleagues from other disciplines to disregard setting features related to time and space (inadequate rooms, e.g. too busy or noisy); limited time for face-to-face discussion of cases or problems; conflicts with patients/relatives/colleagues, and fear of reciprocal manipulation.
Moving on the interface between psychiatry and the somatic disciplines, CL specialists need to develop special skills, not only those strictly technical, but also those “soft skills” including relational abilities and flexibility. Understanding the systemic aspects of referrals in the relationship between physician, staff and patients is usually essential in the process of consultation.
The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
- Type
- W14
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 33 , Issue S1: Abstracts of the 24th European Congress of Psychiatry , March 2016 , pp. S60 - S61
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.