Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:32:27.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients. A case vignette study in 16 European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Tilman Steinert  and
Peter Lepping
Tilman Steinert*
Affiliation:
Centre for Psychiatry Weissenau, Ulm University, Department of Psychiatric Care Research, Weingartshofer Straße 2, 88214Ravensburg-Weissenau, Germany
Peter Lepping
Affiliation:
North Wales Section of Psychological Medicine, Wrexham Academic Unit, Technology Park, Wrexham, Wales, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 751 7601 2738; fax: +49 751 7601 2767. E-mail address: [email protected] (T. Steinert).
Get access

Abstract

Aim

To compare the clinical management of typical scenarios by using three case vignettes in a substantial number of European countries.

Method

Three case vignettes and an associated questionnaire, filled in and finalised by at least two experts from each country.

Results

Legislation and clinical practice varies widely across the 16 included countries. No specific pattern emerged. Certain practices (intravenous medication, mechanical restraint, net beds and forensic transfers, respectively) only exist in few countries. Legislation for involuntary medication is most restrictive in the Netherlands.

Conclusions

There is little harmonisation and a lack of consistent standards within and across European countries regarding treatment and management of violent patients.

Keywords

ViolenceMedicationCountryLegislationRestraintSeclusion
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 135 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, T., Hülsmann, S., Knudsen, H.C., Martiny, K., Amaddeo, F., Herran, A.et al.Provision of services for people with schizophrenia in five European regions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2002;37:465–474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowers, L., Alexander, J., Simpson, A., Ryan, C., Carr-Walker, P.Cultures of psychiatry and the professional socialization process: the case of containment methods for disturbed patients. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:435–442CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowers, L., Whittington, R., Almvik, R., Bergman, B., Oud, N., Savio, M.A European perspective on psychiatric nursing and violent incidents: management, education and service organisation. Int J Nurs Stud 1999;36:217–222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssen, W.A., Noorthoorn, E.O., de Vries, W.J., Hutschemeakers, G.H.M., Lendemeijer, H. The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe. Callaghan, P., Nijman, H., Palmstierna, T., Oud, N. Violence in clinical psychiatry. Proceedings of the 5th European Congress on violence in clinical psychiatry, Kavanah 2007; 345Google Scholar
Kallert, T.W., Glöckner, M., Onchev, G., Raboch, J., Karastergiou, A., Solomon, Z.et al.The EUNOMIA project on coercion in psychiatry: study design and preliminary data. World Psychiatry 2005;4:168–172Google ScholarPubMed
Kallert, T.W., Priebe, S., McCabe, R., Kiejna, A., Rymaszewska, J., Nawka, P.et al.Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? A European multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68:278–287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lepping, P.Ethical analysis of the new proposed mental health legislation in England and Wales. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2007;12(2):5Google Scholar
Martin, V., Bernhardsgrütter, R., Goebel, R., Steinert, T.The use of mechanical restraint and seclusion in patients with schizophrenia: a comparison of the practice in Germany and Switzerland. Clin Pract Epidemol Ment Health 2007;3:1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijman, H.L.I., Palmstierna, T., Almvik, R., Stolker, J.J.Fifteen years of research with the staff observation aggression scale – a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005;111:12–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priebe, S., Badesconyi, A., Fioritti, A., Hansson, L., Kilian, R., Torres-Gonzales, F.et al.Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: comparison of data on service provision from six European countries. BMJ 2005;330:123–126Google ScholarPubMed
Reininghaus, U., Priebe, S.Assessing morale in community mental health professionals: a pooled analysis of data from four European countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007;42:237–243Google ScholarPubMed
Richter, D., Whittington, R.Violence in clinical psychiatry. Causes, consequences, management; Springer; 2006.Google Scholar
Riecher-Rössler, A., Rössler, W.Compulsory admission of psychiatric patients – an international comparison. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993;87:231–236CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Röttgers, H.R., Lepping, P.Commitment and treatment of psychiatric patients in Great Britain and Germany. Psychiatr Prax 1999;26:139–142Google ScholarPubMed
Ruggeri, M., Lasalvia, A., Bisoffi, G., Thornicroft, G., Vàzquez-Barquero, J.L., Becker, T.et al.Satisfaction with mental health services among people with schizophrenia in five European sites: results from the EPSILON Study. Schizophr Bull 2003;29:229–245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salize, H.J., Dressing, H.Admission of mentally disordered offenders to specialized forensic care in fifteen European Union member states. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007;42:336–342Google ScholarPubMed
Salize, H.J., Dressing, H.Epidemiology of involuntary placement of mentally ill people across the European Union. Br J Psychiatry 2004;184:163–168Google ScholarPubMed
Steinert, T., Lepping, P., Baranyai, R., Hoffmann, M., Leherr, H.Compulsory admission and treatment in schizophrenia: a study of ethical attitudes in four European countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005;40:635–641Google ScholarPubMed
Whittington, R. The European Violence in Psychiatry Research Group (EViPRG). Callaghan, P., Nijman, H., Palmstierna, T., Oud, N. Violence in clinical psychiatry. Proceedings of the 5th European congress on violence in Clinical Psychiatry, Kavanah 2007; 345Google Scholar
Wynn, R.Staff’s choice of formal and informal coercive interventions in psychiatric emergencies. Int J Forensic Ment Health 2003;2:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.