Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:00:38.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inter-rater reliability of two depression rating scales, MADRS and DRRS, based on videotape records of structured interviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

E Corruble ,
D Purper ,
C Payan  and
JD Guelfi
E Corruble
Affiliation:
Service de Psychiatrie, Groupe Hospitalier Paul Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitau.x de Paris, Université Paris XI, 12-14 avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94804Villejuif ceden, France
D Purper
Affiliation:
Service de Psychiatrie, Groupe Hospitalier Paul Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitau.x de Paris, Université Paris XI, 12-14 avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94804Villejuif ceden, France
C Payan
Affiliation:
Service de Psychiatrie, Groupe Hospitalier Paul Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitau.x de Paris, Université Paris XI, 12-14 avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94804Villejuif ceden, France
JD Guelfi
Affiliation:
Service de Psychiatrie, Groupe Hospitalier Paul Brousse, Assistance Publique Hôpitau.x de Paris, Université Paris XI, 12-14 avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94804Villejuif ceden, France
Get access

Summary

The inter-rater reliability of the French versions of the MADRS and the DRRS was studied on the basis of 58 videotape records of structured standardised interviews of depressed inpatients under antidepressant treatment. Each patient was assessed by two trained raters, from the same videotape recording. The inter-rater reliability of total scores was high with both scales (intra-class correlation coefficients: 0.86 for MADRS and 0.77 for DRRS). However, the inter-rater reliability for individual items was higher and more homogeneous for the MADRS than for the DRRS. Finally, the structured interview in French appears to be relevant for the MADRS, but it should be improved for the DRRS.

Keywords

MADRSDRRSinter-rater reliabilityvideotape recordsstructured interview
Type
Short communication
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , August 1998 , pp. 264 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreasen, NC, Mac Donald-Scott, P, Grove, WM, Keller, MB, Shapiro, RW, Hirschfeld, RMAAssessment of reliability in multicenter collaborative research with a videotape approach Am J Psychiatry 139 1982 876–882Google ScholarPubMed
Fermanian, JThe degree of concordance between observers The quantitative case Rev Epidém Santé Publ 32 1984 408–413Google ScholarPubMed
Fermanian, JMeasure of concordance between two observers. The qualitative case Rev Epidém Santé Publ 32 1984 140–147Google Scholar
Fleck, MPA, Guelfi, JD, Poirier-Littré, MF, Lôo, HApplication of a structured interview guide for four depression scales Encéphale XX 1994 479–486Google Scholar
Guelfi, JDL'évaluation clinique standardisée en psychiatrie tome 1 1993 Éditions Médicales Pierre Fabre BoulogneGoogle Scholar
Jouvent, R, Frechette, D, Binoux, F, Lancrenon, S, des Lauriers, ALe ralentissement psycho-moteur dans les états dépressifs: construction d'une échelle d'évaluation quantitative Encéphale VI 1980 41–58Google Scholar
Katz, MM, Itil, TMVideo methodology for research in psycho-pathology and psychopharmacology Arch Gen Psychiatry 31 1974 204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, F, Pellet, J, Postic, Y, Beau, JM, Lancrenon, S, Blanchon, YWidlöcher's depressive retardation scale and Montgomery Asberg's depression rating scale: an interrater study Eur Psychiatry 6 1991 47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecrubier, YEchelle de ralentissementGuelfi, JDL'Évaluation Clinique Standardisée en Psychiatrie 1993 Éditions Médicales Pierre Fabre Boulogne227–234Google Scholar
Lempérière, T, Lépine, JP, Rouillon, F, Hardy, P, Adès, J, Luauté, JP, Ferrand, IComparaison de différents instruments d'évaluation de la dépression à l'occasion d'une étude sur l'Athymil 30 mg Ann Médico Psychol 142 1984 1206–1212Google Scholar
Montgomery, S, Asberg, MA new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change Br J Psychiatry 134 1979 382–389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellet, JL'Échelle de Dépression de Montgomery et AsbergGuelfi, JDL'Évaluation Clinique Standardisée en Psychiatrie 1993 Éditions Médicales Pierre Fabre Boulogne203–208Google Scholar
Pellet, J, Decrat, M, Lang, Fet alDescription d'un échantillon de 300 échelles MADRS portant sur des sujets déprimés Ann Médico Psychol 145 1987 170–175Google Scholar
Peyré, F, Martinez, R, Calache, M, Verdoux, H, Bourgeois, MRevalidation de l'échelle de dépression de Montgomery et Asberg (MADRS) sur un groupe de 147 patients déprimés hospitalisés Ann Médico Psychol 147 1989 762–767Google Scholar
Widlöcher, DPsychomotor retardation: clinical, theoretical and psychometric aspects Psychiatr Clin North Am 6 1983 27–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.