Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:09:20.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inter-rater reliability of ICD-10 in Chinese patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

AHT Pang ,
GS Ungvari ,
CK Wong  and
T Leung
AHT Pang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry,=, 11/F, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China
GS Ungvari*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry,=, 11/F, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China
CK Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry,=, 11/F, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China
T Leung
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry,=, 11/F, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China
*
*Correspondence and reprints.
Get access

Summary

In an attempt to assess the universal applicability of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10), two psychiatrists from different socio-cultural backgrounds and training independently performed a chart review of 238 Chinese patients. Inter-rater reliability figures were comparable to those found in the WHO-coordinated ICD-10 field trials. The results suggest that ICD-10 has good ‘universality’ in routine clinical practice.

Keywords

ICD-10chart reviewinter-rater reliability
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , 1997 , pp. 8 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daradkeh, TK, Saad, A. The reliability of the ICD-10 psychiatric diagnoses. Nordic J Psychiat 1993; 47: 369–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, MB, Lavon, PW, Andreasen, N, et al.Test-retest reliability of assessing psychiatrically ill patients in a multi-center design J Psychiat Res 16 1981 213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendell, REThe Role of Diagnosis in Psychiatry. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975Google Scholar
Kitamura, T, Shima, S, Sakio, E, Kato, M. Application of Research Diagnostic Criteria and International Classification of Diseases to case vignettes. J Clin Psychiatry 1986; 47: 78–80Google ScholarPubMed
Leckman, JF, Sholomskas, D, Thompson, WD. Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982; 39: 879–883CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okasha, A, Sadek, A, Al-Haddad, MK, Abdel-Mawgoud, M. Diagnostic agreement in psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 162: 621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regier, DA, Kaelber, CT, Roper, MT, Rae, DS, Sartorius, N. The ICD-10 clinical field trial for mental and behavioural disorders: results in Canada and the United States. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151: 1340–1350Google ScholarPubMed
Sartorius, N, Kaelber, CT, Cooper, JE, et al.Progress towards achieving a common language in psychiatry Arch Gen Psychiatry 50 1993 115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Cohen, J, Fleiss, JL, Endicott, J. Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis: a new approach. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1967; 17: 83–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, Y, Yang, W, Phillips, MR, Dai, C, Zheng, H. Reliability and validity of a Chinese computerized diagnostic instrument. Acta Psychiat Scand 1987; 77: 32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wig, NCross-cultural and national issues in psychiatric classification. In: Mezzich, JE, Honda, Y, Kastrup, MC eds. Psychiatric Diagnosis. A World Perspective. New York: Springer, 1994; 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: WHO, 1992Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.