Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T18:58:30.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interest and limitations of projective techniques in the assessment of personality disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J.M. Petot
J.M. Petot*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Psychologie clinique des faits culturels, Département de Psychologie, Université Paris X-Nanterre, 200, avenue de la République, 92001Nanterre, [email protected]
*
* Correspondence and reprints : [email protected]
Get access

Summary

Assessing personality disorders (PD) remains a difficult task because of persistent problems linked to concurrent validity of existing instruments, which are all structured interviews or self-report inventories. It has been advocated that indirect methods, projective techniques in particular, can strengthen PD assessment methods. The thematic apperception test (TAT) may be a significant adjuvant method of PD assessment.

Keywords

assessmentpersonality disorderspersonality inventoriesprojective techniquesthematic apperception test (TAT)
Type
Short Review Article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 15 , Issue S1 , June 2000 , pp. 11 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, S.J, Clemence, A.J, Weatherill, R, Hilsenroth, M.JUse of the TAT in the assessment of DSM-IV cluster B personality disorders J Person Assess 12 1999 422–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th 1994 APA Press WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, NScale for the assessment of thought, language, and communication (TLC) Schizophr Bull 11 1986 473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, I, Ridgeway, D, Cassidy, JAssessing internal working models of the attachment relationship: an attachment story completion task for 3-year-oldsGreenberg, M.TCicchetti, DCummings, E.MAttachment in the preschool years: theory, research and intervention 1990 University of Chicago Press ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Clark, L.AManual for the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality 1993 University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
Clark, L.A, Livesley, W.J, Morey, LPersonality disorder assessment: the challenge of construct validity J Person Dis 51 1997 205–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coolidge, F.L, Merwin, M.MReliability and validity of the Coolidge axis II inventory: A new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders J Person Assess 153 1992 223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P.T, McCrae, R.RRevised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual 1992 Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, FLGoogle Scholar
Düss, LLa méthode des fables en psychanalyse infantile 1950 L’Arche ParisGoogle Scholar
Exner, J.EThe Rorschach: a comprehensive system 2nd 1986 Wiley New YorkGoogle Scholar
First, M, Gibbon, M, Spitzer, R.L, Williams, J.B, Benjamin, L.SUser’s guide for the structured clinical interview for the DSM-IV axis II personality disorders 1994 American Psychiatric Press Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, J.GThe borderline patient’s intolerance of aloneness: insecure attachments and therapist availability Am J Psychiatr 49 1996 752–758Google Scholar
Hare, R.DThe Hare psychopathy checklist-revised manual 1991 Multi-Health Systems North Tonawanda, NYGoogle Scholar
Hyler, S.EPersonality diagnostic questionnaire-IV (PDQ-IV) 1994 New York State Psychiatric Institute New YorkGoogle Scholar
Johnston, M.H, Holzman, P.SAssessing schizophrenic thinking 1979 Jossey- Blass San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
Loranger, A.WInternational personality disorder examination manual: ICD-10 module 1995 Switzerland GenevaGoogle Scholar
Millon, TMillon clinical multiaxial inventory-III manual 1998 National Computer Systems MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
Morey, L.C, Waugh, M.H, Blashfield, R.KMMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: their derivations and correlates J Person Assess 149 1985 245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, H.AManual for the thematic apperception test 1943 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Perry, JProblems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders Am J Psychiatr 152 1992 1645–1653Google Scholar
Perry, JProblems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders Am J Psychiatr 45 1995 253–257Google Scholar
Rapaport, D, Gill, M, Schafer, RDiagnostic psychological testing. Rev. ed. Holt RR 1968 International Universities Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
Raskin, R.N, Hall, C.SA narcissistic personality inventory Psychol Reports 12 1979 590–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorschach, HPsychodiagnostics 6th 1964 Grune & Stratton New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, S.AThe Rosenzweig picture-frustration (PF) study: Basic manual 1978 Rana House St. LouisGoogle Scholar
Solovay, M.R, Gasparetti, S, Coleman, M, Kestenbaum, E, Carpenter, T, Holzman, P.SScoring manual for the thought disorder index Schizophr Bull 24 1986 29–50Google Scholar
Spitzer, R.LPsychiatric diagnosis: are clinicians still necessary? Compr Psychiatry 26 1983 399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, MMéthode des histoires à compléter Archiv Psychol 1937 209–284Google Scholar
Wagner, E.EThe hand-test manual 1978 Western Psychological Services Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
Zanarini, M, Frankenburg, F.R, Sickel, A.E, Young, LDiagnostic interview for DSM-IV personality disorders 1994 Laboratory for the Study of Adult Development, McLean Hospital, and the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard University Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.