Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:23:08.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of depression is unevenly distributed in the population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Dag Isacson ,
Kerstin Bingefors  and
Lars von Knorring
Dag Isacson*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Uppsala University, Box 580, BMC, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
Kerstin Bingefors
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Uppsala University, Box 580, BMC, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Lars von Knorring
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 18 471 4294; fax: +46 18 471 4223. E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Isacson).
Get access

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of depression on quality of life in the general population by studying its effects on i) health-related quality of life (HRQoL), ii) health state utilities, and iii) the burden of disease in the population according to age, sex, marital status, education, economy and employment.

Methods

Cross-sectional survey in the County of Uppsala, Sweden. A statistical sample of the general population aged 20–64 years (N = 4506) was used. Information on current state of depression was obtained by self-report. HRQoL was measured using Short Form 36 (SF-36). The time trade-off (TTO) method was used to measure health state utilities. The decrease of total health state utilities associated with depression in the population was used as a measure of burden of disease.

Results

Depression was reported by 4.0% of the population. Those with depression scored significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those without on all eight of the SF-36 domains. The depressed group also rated their health state utilities significantly lower than the others: 0.796 versus 0.933 (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis of decrease in utilities with various medical disorders, depression was associated with the greatest decrease (–0.090, P < 0.001). Persons with depression accounted for 10.9% of the total decrease in utilities in the whole population, but this proportion varied according to the specific subgroup. For example, 16.4% and 8.6% of the total burden of disease was linked to depression among single and married people, respectively. The corresponding figures for those with the lowest and highest incomes were 15.0% and 7.9%, respectively. Among the unemployed, persons reporting depression accounted for 15.3% of the decrease in utilities in contrast to 4.9% among the employed.

Conclusions

Depression has a strong impact on the quality of life and total disability in the general population. Further, the impact of depression is unevenly distributed in the population.

Keywords

DepressionEpidemiologyBurden of diseaseHealth-related quality of lifeUtilitiesTime trade-off
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , May 2005 , pp. 205 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier SAS 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennet, KJ, Torrance, GW, Boyle, MH, Guscott, R, Morgan, LADevelopment and testing of a utility measure for major unipolar depression (McSad). Qual Life Res 2000;9:109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingefors, K, Isacson, D, Von Knorring, L, Smedby, BPrescription drug use and health care utilization among patients treated with antidepressants in a Swedish community. Ann Pharmacother 1995;29:566–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleichrodt, H, Johannesson, MAn experimental test of a theoretical foundation for rating scale valuations. Med Decis Making 1997;17:208–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenschein, K, Johannesson, MRelationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities and willingness to pay in patients with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1998;80:1989–1994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burvill, PRecent progress in the epidemiology of major depression. Epidemiol Rev 1995;17:21–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, M, O’Brien, B, Stoddart, G, Torrance, GMethods for economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, Toronto: Oxford University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
Froberg, D, Kane, RMethodology for measuring health-state preferences I: measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42:345–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froberg, D, Kane, RMethodology for measuring health-state preferences II: scaling measurements. J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42:459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, M, Vlaeyen, J, Rutten, , Van Mölken, M, Van der Linden, SPatient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method. Pain 1999;80:365–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagnell, O, Lanke, J, Rorsman, B, Öjesjö, LAre we entering an age of melancholy? Depressive illnesses in a prospective epidemiological study over 25 years: the Lundby Study, Sweden. Psychol Med 1982;12:279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, RD, Wells, KB, Sherbourne, CD, Rogers, W, Spritzer, KFunctioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared with chronic general medical illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, RC, McGonagle, KA, Zhao, S, Nelson, CB, Hughes, M, Eshleman, Set al.Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:8–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundberg, L, Johannesson, M, Isacson, D, Borgquist, LThe relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population. Med Dec Making 1999;19:128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, L, Broman, J, Hetta, JRelationship between insomnia, depression, and mortality: a 12-year follow-up of older adults in the community. Int Psychoger 2000;12:295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melse, JM, Essink-Bot, M-L, Kramers, PGN, Hoeymans, NA national burden of disease calculation: Dutch disability-adjusted life-years. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1241–1247.Google ScholarPubMed
Murray, CJL, Acharya, AKUnderstanding DALYs. J Health Econ 1996;16:703–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C, Lopez, AThe global burden of disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.Google ScholarPubMed
Murray, CJL, Lopez, ADAlternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: global burden of disease study. Lancet 1997;349:1498–1504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, CJL, Lopez, ADMortality by cause for eight regions of the world: global burden of disease study. Lancet 1997;349:1269–1276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, C, Salomon, J, Mathers, CA critical examination of summary measures of population health. Bull World Health Org 2000;78:981–994.Google ScholarPubMed
Nord, ECost-value analysis in health care. Cambridge: University Press; 1999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nörholm, V, Bech, PThe WHO quality of life (WHOQOL) questionnaire: Danish validation study. Nord J Psychiatry 2001;55:229–235.Google ScholarPubMed
Olsson, G Adolescent depression. Epidemiology, nosology, life stress, and social network (PhD thesis). Uppsala: Uppsala University; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, S, Ostling, S, Skoog, IThe incidence of first-onset depression in a population followed from the age of 70 to 85. Psychol Med 2001;31:1159–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, L-O, Karlsson, J, Bengtsson, C, Steen, B, Sullivan, MThe Swedish SF-36 health survey II: evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1095–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, S, Backlund, I, Diderichsen, FSjukdomsbördan i Sverige—en svensk DALY-kalkyl (The burden of disease in Sweden—a Swedish DALY-calculation). Stockholm: Folkhälsoinstitutet, Stockolms läns landsting, Socialstyrelsen; 1998.Google Scholar
Pyne, JM, Patterson, TL, Kaplan, RM, Gillin, JC, Koch, WL, Grant, IAssessment of the quality of life of patients with major depression. Psychiatr Serv 1997;48:224–230.Google ScholarPubMed
Read, J, Quin, R, Berwick, D, Fineberg, H, Weinstein, MPreference for health outcomes: comparison of assessment methods. Med Decis Making 1984;4:315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revicki, D, Wood, MPatient-assigned health state utilities for depression-related outcomes: differences by severity and antidepressant medications. J Affect Dis 1998;48:25–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rorsman, B, Gräsbeck, A, Hagnell, O, Lanke, J, Öhman, R, Öjesjö, Let al.A prospective study of first-incidence depression. The Lundby study, 1957–72. Br J Psychol 1990;156:336–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutz, W, Wålinder, J, Von Knorring, L, Pihlgren, H, Rihmer, ZIs depression in men under-treated? High frequency of sudden, unexpected suicides (in Swedish). Lakartidningen 1995;92:3893–3894.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc The SAS system for Windows, Release 6.12. USA: Cary, NC; 1996.Google Scholar
Schopper, D, Pereira, J, Torres, A, Cuende, N, Alonso, M, Baylin, Aet al.Estimating the burden of disease in one Swiss canton: what do disability adjusted life years (DALY) tell us?. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:871–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherbourne, C, Unutzer, J, Schoenbaum, M, Duan, N, Lenert, L, Sturm, Ret al.Can utility-weighted health-related quality-of-life estimates capture health effects of quality improvement for depression?. Med Care 2001;39:1246–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Kroenke, K, Linzer, M, Hahn, SR, Williams, JBW, deGruy, FVet al.Health-related quality of life in primary care patients with mental disorders. J Am Med Assoc 1995;274:1511–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Sweden Living Conditions. Appendix 13. Technical report for 1984–85, 1986–87 and 1988–89 years surveys of living conditions. Örebro: SCB-Tryck; 1991.Google Scholar
Statistics Sweden Living Conditions. Report no 76. Health and medical care 1980–1989. Örebro: SCB-Tryck; 1992.Google Scholar
Strand, B, Dalgard, O, Tambs, K, Rognerud, MMeasuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry 2003;57:113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M, Karlsson, JThe Swedish SF-36 health survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1105–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorslund, M, Wärneryd, BMethodological research in the Swedish surveys of living conditions. Problems of measurements and data collection. Soc Ind Res 1985;16:77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, GSocial preferences for health states. Socioecon Plann Sci 1976;10:129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsevat, J, Keck, PE, Hornung, RW, McElroy, SLHealth values of patients with bipolar disorder. Qual Life Res 2000;9:579–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Knorring, LDepressive syndromes in patients with physical disorders In: Treatment of depression Workshop, vol. 1 Uppsala: Läkemedelsverket (Medical Products Agency); 1992. 205–215.Google Scholar
Ware, J, Sherbourne, CThe MOS 36 item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992;30:473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, J, Snow, K, Kosinski, M, Gandek, BSF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide Boston: New England Medical Center; 1993.Google Scholar
Watkins, C, Daniels, L, Jack, C, Dickinson, H, Van den Broek, MAccuracy of a single question in screening for depression in a cohort of patients after stroke: comparative study. Br Med J 323 2001 1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, KB, Sherbourne, CDFunctioning and utility for current health of patients with depression or chronical medical conditions in managed, primary care practices. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56: 897–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, KB, Stewart, A, Hays, RD, Burnan, MA, Rogers, W, Daniels, Met al.The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results of the Medical Outcomes Study. J Am Med Assoc 1989;262: 914–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J, Mulrow, C, Kroenke, K, Dhanda, R, Badgett, R, Omori, Det al.Case-finding for depression in primary care: a randomized trial. Am J Med 1999;106: 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.