Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:41:52.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feasibility of the Virtual Reality-based Anxiety Behavior Evaluation System (VRABES) for patients with panic disorder.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

J. Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic Of
S.-H. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic Of
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The high recurrence rate and diagnostic stability are current problems in treating panic disorder. Because anxiety symptoms are often temporary, it is hard to evaluate anxiety behaviors objectively. In evaluating anxiety behavior, virtual reality is suitable tools that can help bridge the gap between where the symptoms are and where the treatment is given.

Objectives

This study aims to develop VRABES, an anxiety behavior evaluation system for objectively assessing an individual’s anxious behavior, and to evaluate the feasibility of VRABES.

Methods

Patients with panic disorder (ANX group) and healthy controls (CON group) matched for sex, age, and marital status were recruited through outpatient clinics and public advertisements. VRABES consists of four modules; Baseline evaluation (module 0), Daily environment exposure (module 1), Relaxation (module 2), and Interoceptive exposure (module 3). Except for the Baseline evaluation module, the other three modules consisted of three steps, including 1) pre-evaluation, 2) virtual environment 1, and 3) virtual environment 2. In VRABES, subjective anxiety experience (AS) were collected for three times (pre, during, post) for module 1, 2, and 3. we conducted a repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to explore any significant differences in self-rating anxiety scores among groups and repetition for each module controlling for age, sex, smoking usage, alcohol usage, and depression. Additionally, partial correlation coefficients were calculated on the relationships between measures in VRABES and Panic disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) in the ANX group to eliminate the effects of demographic variables (age, sex, smoking usage, alcohol usage), and other psychological assessment scores [Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: Self-Report Version (LSAS-SR), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)].

Results

Table presents the significant results of repeated-meausre ANCOVA. Figure shows the significant results among the paired t-tests for each group conducted as a post-hoc test for the interaction effect shown in Module 1 and Module 2.Table.Results of repeated-measured ANCOVA for self-rating anxiety scores in the two groups (ANX and CON) and different time (pre, during, and post) concerning each module.

variableMain effect-grouppost-hocMain effect-timepost-hocInteraction effectpost-hoc
Fp-valueFp-valueFp-value
Module111.3730.002CON < ANX4.2390.017pre < post during < post4.0850.02see Fig
Module26.7360.013CON < ANX0.4740.6244.1980.018see Fig
Module35.240.027CON < ANX0.2250.7990.0610.941

There are no significant results found in partial correlation analysis between PDSS scores and self-rating anxiety scores from VRABES.

Conclusions

The results showed that the VRABES is a reliable and valid research tool.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.