Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:32:19.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanatory models of addictive behaviour among native German, Russian-German, and Turkish youth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

S. Penka ,
H. Heimann ,
A. Heinz  and
M. Schouler-Ocak
Get access

Abstract

In Germany, the public system of addiction treatment is used less by migrants with addictive disorders than by their non-migrant counterparts. To date, the literature has focused primarily on language, sociocultural factors, and residence status when discussing access barriers to this part of the health care system. However, little attention has been paid to cultural differences in explanatory models of addictive behaviour. This is surprising when we consider the important role played by popular knowledge in a population's perceptions of and responses to illnesses, including their causes, symptoms, and treatment.

In the present study, we examined explanatory models of addictive behaviour and of mental disorders in 124 native German und Russian-German youth and compared these models to those observed in an earlier study of 144 German and Turkish youth. We employed the free listing technique German and to compile the terms that participating subjects used to describe addictive behaviour. Subsequently, we examined how a subset of our study population assigned these terms to the respective disorders by means of the pile sort method.

Although the explanatory models used by the German and Russian-German youth in our study were surprisingly similar, those employed by Turkish youth did not make any fundamental distinction between illegal and legal drugs (e.g. alcohol and nicotine). German and Russian-German youth regarded eating disorders as “embarrassing” or “disgraceful”, but Turkish youth did not. Unlike our German and Russian-German subjects, the Turkish youth did not classify eating disorders as being addictive in nature. Moreover, medical concepts crucial to a proper understanding of dependence disorders (e.g. the term “physical dependence”) were characterised by almost half of our Turkish subjects as useless in describing addictions.

These findings show that it is impossible to translate medical or everyday concepts of disease and treatment properly into a different language without considering the connotations and implications of each term as it relates to the respective culture. Terms that are central to Western medical models of disease may otherwise be misunderstood, misinterpreted, or simply rejected.

Keywords

Explanatory modelsAddictive behaviourNative GermanRussian-GermanTurkish youth
Type
Research Article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 23 , Issue S1: Transcultural psychiatry in Europe , January 2008 , pp. s36 - s42
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

equal contributions.

References

Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Ausländerfragen. Bericht über die Lage der Ausländer in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin, Bonn;2000.Google Scholar
Bernard, H.R.Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press, 1995249-52Google Scholar
Borgatti, S.P.Anthropac 4.0. Methods Guide Natick: Analytic Technologies, 1996Google Scholar
Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Migration und Asyl in Zahlen. Tabellen, Diagramme und Erläuterungen. Stand: 30 Juni 2004, Berlin;2004.Google Scholar
Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF). Migrationsbericht des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge im Auftrag der Bundesregierung. Migrationsbericht 2005. Nürnberg;2005.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. Familien ausländischer Herkunft in Deutschland. Leistungen – Belastungen – Herausforderungen. Sechster Familienbericht, Berlin;2000.Google Scholar
Czycholl, D.Migration, Suchtrisiken und Versorgungsdefizite am Beispiel von Aussiedlern in Deutschland. Salman, R., Tuna, S., Lessing, A.Handbuch interkulturelle Suchthilfe. Modelle, Konzepte und Ansätze der Prävention, Beratung und Therapie Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag, 1999; 222–227Google Scholar
Drogenbeauftragte der Bundesregierung. Drogen- und Suchtbericht. Berlin;Mai 2007.Google Scholar
Drogenbeauftragte der Bundesregierung. Drogen- und Suchtbericht der Drogenbeauftragten der Bundesregierung. Berlin;April 2004.Google Scholar
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Luxembourg: Annual Report: Selected issues;2006.Google Scholar
Grüsser S M, Becker K. Drogenabhängigkeit und Migration innerhalb der Europäischen Union (EU). In: Gölz J, editor. Moderne Suchtmedizin;5/1999. p.1-7.Google Scholar
Haasen, C., Toprak, M.A., Yagdiran, O., Kleinemeier, E.Psychosoziale Aspekte der Sucht bei Migranten. Suchttherapie. Prävention, Behandlung, wissenschaftliche Grundlagen 2001; 2: 161–166Google Scholar
Haasen, C., Blätter, A., Gharaei, D., Toprak, M.A., Haferkorn, J., Reimer, J.Psychosocial Aspects of Opiate Dependence Among Turkish Migrants in Germany. J Ethn Subst Abuse 2004;3:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, A., Payne-Jackson, A.Acculturation of Explanatory models: Jamaican blood terms and concepts. Latin American Essays 1999; 11: 19–28Google Scholar
Kleinman, A.Patients and healers in the context of culture. An Exploration of the borderland between Anthropology, Medicine, and Psychiatry Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California press, 1980Google Scholar
Kuckartz U. winMAX Professionelle Version – Handbuch zum Textanalysesystem winMAX für Windows 95/98/NT. Opladen : Westdeutscher Verlag;1999.Google Scholar
McCabe, R., Priebe, S.Explanatory models of illness in schizophrenia: comparison of four ethnic groups. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 185: 25–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse 5. überarb. Auflage. Weinheim; 1995.Google Scholar
Osterloh, K.Arbeit mit illegale Suchtmittel konsumierenden Migranten und Migrantinnen aus der GUS. Am Beispiel der Mudra Drogenhilfe Nürnberg. Barth, W., Schubert, C.Migration –Sucht – Hilfe. Junge Migranten und Migrantinnen aus der GUS in den Systemen Suchthilfe und Migrationsberatung Emwe – Verlag: Nürnberg, 2002; 43–58Google Scholar
Penka, S., Krieg, S., Hunner, C., Heinz, A.Unterschiedliche Erklärungsmodelle für abhängiges Verhalten bei türkischen und deutschen Jugendlichen – Bedeutung für Prävention und Behandlungsangebote. Nervenarzt 2003; 74: 581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penka, S.Migration und Sucht – Notwendigkeit einer „Interkulturellen Suchthilfe“ ?. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag: 2004Google Scholar
Reddaway, P.Civil Society and Soviet Psychiatry. Problems of Communism 1991; 40: 41–48Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.