Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T18:54:58.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The experience and impact of stigma in Saudi people with a mood disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

D. Alateeq*
Affiliation:
King Saud University- College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
A. AlDaoud
Affiliation:
King Saud University- College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
A. AlHadi
Affiliation:
King Saud University- College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia King Saud University- College of Medicine, SABIC Psychological Health Research & Applications Chair, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
H. AlKhalaf
Affiliation:
King Saud University- College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Self-stigma plays a powerful role in attitudes toward mental illness and seeking psychological services. Assessing stigma from the perspective of people with mood disorders is important as they were ranked as major causes of disability.

Objectives

To determine the extent and the impact of stigma experience in Saudi patients with mood disorder and compare them between depression and bipolar disorder patients. To test if stigma is a universal experience and has similar psychosocial impact across cultures.

Aim

It's a part of multicenter international study comparing its results to the universal experiences inthe perspectives of individuals with mood disorder.

Methodology

We randomly interviewed 94 individuals with mood disorder at King Khalid University Hospital using valid reliable tool, Inventory of Stigmatizing Experiences (ISE), which has two components: Stigma Experiences Scale (SES) and Stigma Impact Scale (SIS).

Results

ISE was validated in a population of Saudi patients with mood disorder. There were no significant differences in stigma between patients with bipolar or depressive disorder on SES or SIS. However, over 50% of all respondents tried to hide their mental illness from the others, and to avoid situations that might lead them to be stigmatized. In comparison with the Canadian population, Saudi participants scored lower on both SES and SIS, which may be due to cultural differences.

Conclusion

Stigma associated with mood disorder is serious and pervasive. It's important first to understand how patients perceive stigma in order to conduct successful anti-stigma programs. The ISE is a highly reliable instrument among cultures.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW159
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.