Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:31:51.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Examining the person X situation interactions of internalized traits, state body affect and upward comparison behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

A. Rogers
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Psychology, Melbourne, Australia
V. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Canberra, Psychology, Canberra, Australia
I. Krug*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Psychology, Melbourne, Australia
M. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
*
* Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

Although the influence of trait internalization and state body satisfaction on appearance comparisons has been well documented, their interactive influence on comparison behaviours is unknown. Therefore, the present study thus tested a person X situation model in which both mood state and trait internalization interacted to predict engagement in upward comparisons.

Method

One hundred and forty-eight women aged 18 to 40 completed baseline measures of trait internalization, and then completed via iPhone app an experience sampling phase in which they reported momentary experiences of mood and comparison behaviours at up to 6 random times daily for 7 days.

Results

Multilevel analyses revealed that although upward comparisons were more likely for individuals who internalized the thin ideal (t = 3.27, P < .001), this effect was minimized in instances when a participant was satisfied with her appearance (t = –1.90, P = .031). Further exploratory analyses showed that state body satisfaction was a stronger predictor than trait internalization of comparison behaviours (R2 = .14 vs. R2 = .11) when the time lag between state body satisfaction and comparison event was less than 2 hours, but this pattern reversed as the time lag between state level predictor and outcome increased beyond 2 hours (R2 = .09 vs. R2 = .12).

Conclusions

Present findings suggest that bolstering one's body satisfaction in the moment may be as clinically important as reducing a client's interest in the thin ideal for alleviating occurrence of unhealthy body comparisons.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV1358
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.