Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:30:32.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

M. Zinchuk ,
G. Kustov ,
A. Gersamija ,
A. Yakovlev ,
E. Pashnin ,
N. Voinova ,
S. Popova  and
A. Guekht
M. Zinchuk*
Affiliation:
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Suicide Research And Prevention, Moscow, Russian Federation
G. Kustov
Affiliation:
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Suicide Research And Prevention, Moscow, Russian Federation Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry of the Healthcare Department of Moscow, Russian Federation, Department Of The Suicidal Researchs, Moscow, Russian Federation
A. Gersamija
Affiliation:
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Suicide Research And Prevention, Moscow, Russian Federation
A. Yakovlev
Affiliation:
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Suicide Research And Prevention, Moscow, Russian Federation
E. Pashnin
Affiliation:
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Suicide Research And Prevention, Moscow, Russian Federation
N. Voinova
Affiliation:
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Suicide Research And Prevention, Moscow, Russian Federation
S. Popova
Affiliation:
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Suicide Research And Prevention, Moscow, Russian Federation
A. Guekht
Affiliation:
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Suicide Research And Prevention, Moscow, Russian Federation
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Traditional categorical classifications of personality disorders (PD) have been criticized for insufficient structural and cross-cultural validity. In the DSM-5 Section III, alternative model of the PDs (AMPD), the maladaptive personality traits are divided into five domains: negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition and psychoticism. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is a 25-item self-report questionnaire that measures the severity of each of these five domains. To date, no questionnaires assessing pathological personality traits following the AMPD have been validated in Russia.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Russian version of PID-5-BF.

Methods

Five hundred and 86 (female - 505 (86,2%), age - 18–77 years (M - 28.2, SD - 11.5)) consecutive inpatients with non-psychotic mental disorders were assessed with the Russian language version of the PID-5-BF. Exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) with Robust Diagonally Weighted Least Squares method of extraction and Robust Equamax rotation was performed in Factor v 11.04.02.

Results

The results of the ESEM analysis showed good fit of the five-factor model (CFI - 0.982; TLI - 0.971; RMSEA (95% CI) - 0.036 (0.01-0.05). Most of the items had the highest factor loadings on their mother domains. However, two items showed weak loadings on their designated factors (<0.4), and attention seeking item had a primary load to (low) detachment instead of antagonism.

Conclusions

The PID-5-BF was found to be a valid and reliable tool for the evaluation of the AMPD trait domain

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Keywords

Psychometricsalternative model of personality disorders (AMPD)Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF)dimensional model
Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 65 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 30th European Congress of Psychiatry , June 2022 , pp. S373 - S374
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.