Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:58:59.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1218 – Supporting Ethical Quality Through Participation in Child Psychiatry – A Comparative Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

S. Reiter-Theil
Affiliation:
Clinical Ethics, Psychiatric University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
R. Isenrich
Affiliation:
Clinical Ethics, Psychiatric University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
R. Heimann
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
C. Kahmen
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
A. Di Gallo
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Participation is a central requirement of ethical quality in Child Psychiatry. Target criteria are obtaining and maintaining parental informed consent (PIC) and child assent (CA) to hospital admission and treatment. Clinical practice of PIC and CA displays considerable variability and deficits. We report how an innovative implementation strategy through Clinical Ethics Support (CES) impacted on practice.

Method:

Approach: explorative, comparative analysis of 10 cases in a Child Psychiatric ward pre and post ‘implementation of ethical target criteria’ in inpatient routine.

Material: patient charts with documented admission, case conference and dismissal.

Research question: evaluating documented changes after the implementation.

CES strategy: a) screening for ethical problems in daily rounds; b) informing case conferences; c) ‘ethics consultations on demand’; d) education; e) ethics policy regarding isolation.

Results:

5 pre- and 5 post-implementation cases were analysed (retro-/prospectively) with pairs of cases matched for complexity, severity and patient age.

Analysis shows that daily practice changed after implementation: 1. heterogeneity in PIC and CA reduced; 2. overall quality of documentation raised with voids about ethical aspects of PIC and CA filled; 3. standardized documentation of PIC and CA realized.

Discussion:

The approach is innovative and addresses a research of PIC and CA; results are clinically relevant, let alone their contribution to make the patients’ and their parents’ wishes better heard. Explicit documentation of the target criteria PIC and CA gives clear, fast and consistent information on the ethical status and eventual needs for further intervention, valuable for inpatient care as well as follow-up.

Type
EPW14 - Culture, Philosophy and Tele Mental Health
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.