Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:15:29.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of a Suicide Prevention Centre for young people with suicidal behaviour in Copenhagen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

M. Nordentoft ,
J. Branner ,
K. Drejer ,
B. Mejsholm ,
H. Hansen  and
B. Petersson
M. Nordentoft*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400CopenhagenNV, Denmark
J. Branner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400CopenhagenNV, Denmark
K. Drejer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400CopenhagenNV, Denmark
B. Mejsholm
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400CopenhagenNV, Denmark
H. Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2000Frederiksberg, Denmark
B. Petersson
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, Panum Institute, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200CopenhagenNV, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Nordentoft).
Get access

Abstract

Background

In the 1980s, suicide rates in Denmark were among the highest in the world. In 1992, a Suicide Prevention Centre was opened in Copenhagen with a 2-week programme of social and psychological treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the Suicide Prevention Centre.

Methods

In a quasi-experimental study, 362 patients in the Suicide Prevention Centre and a parallel comparison group of 39 patients were interviewed with European Parasuicide Study Interviewer Schedule I (EPSIS I), which is a comprehensive interview including several validated scales. All patients were invited to follow-up interviews with EPSIS II and followed in the National Patients Register and the Cause of Death Register.

Results

At the 1-year follow-up, 59% of patients in the intervention group and 53% of patients in the comparison groups were interviewed with EPSIS II. The intervention group obtained a significantly greater improvement in Beck’s Depression Inventory, Hopelessness Scale, Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale and CAGE-score and a significantly lower repetition rate.

Discussions

Although the design cannot exclude selection bias, it seems likely that the improvement in the intervention group was facilitated by the treatment.

Keywords

SuicidePreventionMortalitySuicide attemptTreatment
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , March 2005 , pp. 121 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier SAS 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allgulander, C, Fisher, LDClinical predictors of completed suicide and repeated self-poisoning in 8895 self-poisoning patients. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Neurol. Sci. 1990;239:270–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AT, Steer, RAClinical predictors of eventual suicide: a 5-to 10-year prospective study of suicide attempters. J. Affect. Disord. 1989;17:203–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AT, Weissman, A, Lester, D, Trexler, LThe measurement of pessimism: the Hopelessness Scale. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1974; 42(6): 861–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AT, Brown, G, Steer, RAPrediction of eventual suicide in psychiatric inpatients by clinical ratings of hopelessness. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1989;57:309–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beresford, TP, Blow, FC, Hill, E, Singer, K, Lucey, MRComparison of CAGE questionnaire and computer-assisted laboratory profiles in screening for covert alcoholism. Lancet 1990; 336(8713): 482–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bush, B, Shaw, S, Cleary, P, Delbanco, TL, Aronson, MDScreening for alcohol abuse using the CAGE questionnaire. Am. J. Med. 1987; 82(2): 231–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullberg, J, Wasserman, D, Stefansson, CGWho commits suicide after a suicide attempt? An 8- to 10-year follow-up in a suburban catchment area. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1988;77:598–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekeberg, O, Ellingsen, O, Jacobsen, DSuicide and other causes of death in a 5-year follow-up of patients treated for self-poisoning in Oslo. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1991;83:432–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldacre, M, Hawton, KRepetition of self-poisoning and subsequent death in adolescents who take overdoses. Br. J. Psychiatry 1985;146:395–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, DP, Hilier, VFA scaled version of General Health Questionnaire. Psychol. Med. 1979;7:139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, DJ, O’Brien, F, Stark, C, Pelosi, A, Smith, HThirteen-year follow-up of deliberate self-harm, using linked data. Br. J. Psychiatry 1998;172:239–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haw, C, Houston, K, Townsend, E, Hawton, KDeliberate self-harm patients with alcohol disorders: characteristics, treatment, and outcome. Crisis 2001; 22(3): 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawton, K, Fagg, JSuicide, and other causes of death, following attempted suicide. Br. J. Psychiatry 1988;152:359–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawton, K, Arensman, E, Townsend, E, Bremner, S, Feldman, E, Goldney, Ret al.Deliberate self-harm: systematic review of efficacy of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments in preventing repetition. BMJ 1998; 317(7156): 441–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerkhof, A.J.F.M.Attempted suicide: patterns and trends. Hawton, KVan Heeringen, KThe international handbook of suicide and attempted suicide. Chichester: Wiley; 2000.49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linehan, MM, Armstrong, HE, Suarez, A, Allmon, D, Heard, HLCognitive-behavioral treatment of chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1991; 48(12): 1060–1064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, B, Wang, AG, Bille-Brahe, UAttempted suicide in Denmark. IV. A 5-year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1990; 81(3): 250–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordentoft, M, Breum, L, Munck, LK, Nordestgaard, AG, Hunding, A, Laursen Bjaeldager, PAHigh mortality by natural and unnatural causes: a 10-year follow-up study of patients admitted to a poisoning treatment centre after suicide attempts. BMJ 1993;306:1637–1641 see commentsCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordentoft, M, Rubin, PJ, Welcher, BSuicide and suicide attempts among young persons in Copenhagen. Nord. J. Psychiatry 1993;47:61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, SJClinical trials. A practical approach. Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: Wiley; 1996.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, MSociety and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: NJ; 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakinofsky, IRepetition of suicidal behaviour. Hawton, KVan Heeringen, KThe international handbook of suicide and attempted suicide. Chichester: Wiley; 2000.385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, E, Hawton, K, Altman, DG, Arensman, E, Gunnell, D, Hazell, Pet al.The efficacy of problem-solving treatments after deliberate self-harm: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with respect to depression, hopelessness and improvement in problems. Psychol. Med. 2001; 31(6):979–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der, SR, Van Rooijen, L, Buskens, E, Allart, E, Hawton, K, Van der, GYet al.Intensive in-patient and community intervention versus routine care after attempted suicide. A randomised controlled intervention study. Br. J. Psychiatry. 171 1997 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation Multicentre Study on Parasuicide World Health Organisation, editor. The European Parasuicide Study. Interviewer schedule World Health Organisation 2000.1–101 [Ref Type: Report]Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.