Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:12:20.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Difficulties in maintaining electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) in a psychiatric hospital during covid19 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

M. Rojo*
Affiliation:
Pharmacie, centre hospitalier Guillaume Régnier, rennes, France
M. Constantin
Affiliation:
Pharmacie, Centre hospitalier Guillaume Regnier, Rennes, France
B. Langree
Affiliation:
Pharmacie, Centre hospitalier Guillaume Regnier, Rennes, France
N. Marie
Affiliation:
Pharmacie, Centre hospitalier Guillaume Regnier, Rennes, France
R. Bellay
Affiliation:
Pharmacie, Centre hospitalier Guillaume Regnier, Rennes, France
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

ECT is an effective care with high level of recommendation. During the COVID19, new recommendations to protect patients and caregivers combined with the increasing use of medicines and medical devices (MD) for anesthesia, caused greater difficulties of supply. Even if vital for patients, it is challenging to maintain ECT in this environment.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to resume the measures implemented in order to maintain ECT during COVID19.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of measures implemented to maintain the ECT during COVID19.

Results

As FFP2 masks were restricted to intensive care units, our hospital were not supplied. After negotiations, the regional health agency (ARS) has granted us an allocation of 100 masks to maintain ECT. Our efficient stock management of personal protective equipment as well as our transparency on these stocks with ARS and sharing with other hospitals out of stock played a role in this agreement.We had to adapt our MDs references according to breaks of many ones and new recommendations. The university hospital helping us in supplying certain missing references. Considering the difficulties in supplying drugs and MDs, and limited availability of anesthetists, we have reduced the number of ECT. Prioritization of patients with vital indications had to be achieved.

Conclusions

The prioritization of some services by the regulatory agency causes many supply difficulties for the others. It would be important to reassess the priority of ECT in such crisis because most of the time other caregivers and regulatory agencies are not aware how they are vital for patients.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.