Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:48:16.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS): Inter-rater and test-retest reliability and validity in a Spanish population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Miguel Roca ,
Rocio Martin-Santos ,
Jerónimo Saiz ,
Jordi Obiols ,
Maria J. Serrano ,
Marta Torrens ,
Susana Subirà ,
Margalida Gili ,
Ricard Navinés  and
Angela Ibañez
...Show all authors
Miguel Roca*
Affiliation:
Hospital Joan March, University of Balearic Islands, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut, Edifici Guillem Cifre, Carretera de Valldemossa km 7,5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Baleares, Spain
Rocio Martin-Santos
Affiliation:
Pharmacologic Research Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM) and Drug Abuse and Psychiatry Department (IAPS), Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona
Jerónimo Saiz
Affiliation:
Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid
Jordi Obiols
Affiliation:
Unitat de Recerca en Psicopatologia i Neuropsicología, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona
Maria J. Serrano
Affiliation:
Hospital Joan March, University of Balearic Islands, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut, Edifici Guillem Cifre, Carretera de Valldemossa km 7,5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Baleares, Spain
Marta Torrens
Affiliation:
Pharmacologic Research Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM) and Drug Abuse and Psychiatry Department (IAPS), Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona
Susana Subirà
Affiliation:
Unitat de Recerca en Psicopatologia i Neuropsicología, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona
Margalida Gili
Affiliation:
Hospital Joan March, University of Balearic Islands, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut, Edifici Guillem Cifre, Carretera de Valldemossa km 7,5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Baleares, Spain
Ricard Navinés
Affiliation:
Pharmacologic Research Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM) and Drug Abuse and Psychiatry Department (IAPS), Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona
Angela Ibañez
Affiliation:
Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid
Marcos Nadal
Affiliation:
Hospital Joan March, University of Balearic Islands, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut, Edifici Guillem Cifre, Carretera de Valldemossa km 7,5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Baleares, Spain
Nieves Barrantes
Affiliation:
Unitat de Recerca en Psicopatologia i Neuropsicología, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona
Francesca Cañellas
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitari Son Dureta, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 971173267; fax: +34 971173190. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Roca).
Get access

Abstract

Objective

To test the reliability and validity of the DIGS in Spanish population.

Methods

Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Spanish version of DIGS was tested in 95 inpatients and outpatients. The resultant diagnoses were compared with diagnoses obtained by the LEAD (Longitudinal Expert All Data) procedure as “gold standard”. The kappa statistic was used to measure concordance between blind inter-raters and between the diagnoses obtained by LEAD procedure and through the DIGS.

Results

Overall kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability was 0.956. The kappa value for individual diagnosis varied from major depression = 0.877 to schizophrenia = 1. Test-retest reliability was 0.926. Kappa for all individual target diagnoses ranged from 0.776 (major depression) to 1. Kappa between LEAD procedure and DIGS ranged from 0.704 (major depression) to 0.825 (bipolar I disorder).

Conclusion

Most of the DSM-IV major psychiatric disorders can be assessed with acceptable to excellent reliability with the Spanish version of the DIGS interview. The Spanish version of DIGS showed an acceptable to excellent concurrent validity. Giving the good reliability and validity of Spanish version of DIGS it should be considered to identify psychiatric phenotypes for genetics studies.

Keywords

DIGSGenetic studiesValidation
Type
Genetic Epidemiology and Its Methods
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 44 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berney, A., Preisig, M., Matthey, M.L., Ferrero, F., Fenton, B.T.Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS): inter-rater and test-retest reliability of alcohol and drug diagnoses. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002;65(2):149–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, T.D.The inheritance of intermediate phenotypes for schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2005;18:135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measurement 1960;20:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, S.N., Mathur, M.N., Das, S.K., Bhatia, T., Sharma, S., Nimgaonkar, V.L.A Hindi version of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. Schizophr Bull 1998;24(3):489–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eun-Jeong, J., Yeon-Ho, J., Jin-Pyo, H., Samuel, H., So-Jin, M., Jin-Hee, H.et al.Korean version of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies: validity and reliability. Compr Psychiatry 2004;45(3):225–229.Google Scholar
Faraone, S.V., Blehar, M.C., Pepple, J., Modlin, S., Norton, J., Nurnberger, J.I.et al.Diagnostic accuracy and confusability analyses: an application to the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. Psych Med 1996;26:401–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleiss, J.L.Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley; 1981.Google Scholar
Gottesman, I.I., Gould, T.D.The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:636–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kranzer, H.R., Kadden, R.M., Babor, T.F., Rounsaville, B.J.Longitudinal expert, all data procedure for psychiatric diagnosis in patients with psychoactive substance use disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis 1994;182:277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, W., Höfgen, B., Zobel, A., Rietschel, M.Genetic models of schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005;255:159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayfield, D., McLeod, G., Hall, P.Alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry 1974;131:1121–1123.Google ScholarPubMed
Nurnberger, J.I., Blehar, M.C., Kaufmann, C.A., York-Cooler, C.Y., Simpson, S.G., Harkavy-Friedman, J.H.et al.Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. Rationale, unique features, and training. Arc Gen Psychiatr 1994;51:849–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palacio, C.A., García, J., Arbeláez, M.P., Sánchez, R., Aguirre, B., Garces, I.C.et al.Validation of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) in Colombia. Biomédica 2004;24(1):56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preisig, M., Fenton, B.T., Matthey, M.L., Berney, A., Ferrero, F.Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS): inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the French version. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999;249:174–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R.L., Endicott, J., Robins, E.Research diagnostic criteria. Arc Gen Psychiatr 1978;35:773–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R.L.Psychiatric diagnosis: are clinicians still necessary?. Compr Psychiatry 1984;24:399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitznagel, E.L., Helzer, J.E.A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:725–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torrens, M., Serrano, D., Astals, M., Pérez-Domínguez, G., Martín-Santos, R.Diagnosing Psychiatric Comorbidity in Substance Abusers. Validity of the Spanish Versions of Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM-IV) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV). Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:1231–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.B.W., Gibbon, M., First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Davies, M., Borus, J.et al.The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID), II: multisite test-retest reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:630–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.