Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T00:32:16.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dentists’ level of stress and used coping strategies during COVID-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

K. S. Serota*
Affiliation:
Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Albert Szent-Gyögyi Medical School, University of Szeged
I. Kovács
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged
A. Balint
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Albert Szent-Gyögyi Medical School, University of Szeged
K. Nagy
Affiliation:
Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

COVID-19 has increased the levels of psychological stress experienced by the dental team, and higher level of constant stress negatively impacts mental health.

Objectives

The study aimed to 1) assess dentists’ level of stress and compare it to normal population data; 2) identify the hierarchy of coping strategies chosen by dentists and their perception of those chosen by team members to manage psychological stress caused by the pandemic; and 3) to ascertain the effects of these coping strategies on dentists’ higher stress level.

Methods

Data from an electronic test battery comprising of general demographic and dental-related variables was collected from 182 licenced Hungarian dentists at the outset of the pandemic. Responses to an empirical series of questions regarding their perceived level of stress, choice of interventional coping skills and their perception of those used by team members were recorded.

Results

Dentists’ level of stress was significantly lower than the stress level measured in a Hungarian normal population (t(386)=-2.227, p=0.027), while financial status has a moderating effect (F(3,176)=4.851, p=0.003). The hierarchy of coping strategies chosen by the dentist indicated that physical activity and exercise, particularly in groups settings (M=4.78, SD=0.463), and socialization with family (M=4.72, SD=0.626) were the most effective coping management strategies, superior to financial compensation, shifting work patterns, systems level change, and decisions within the team structure. Inclusionary strategies with family (M=4.64, SD=0.587), participating in individual leisure activities (M=4.49, SD=0.621) and socializing with friends (M=4.44, SD=0.825) were seen by dentists as more important to team members. Regression analysis was used to ascertain whether the use of these coping strategies increased the likelihood of having higher levels of perceived stress. The model was significant (F(4,169)=8.292, p≤0.001) with R2 of 16.4%. Older age (B=-0.179, S.E.=0.050, t=-3.582, p≤0.001), gender (B=4.214, S.E.=1.423, t=2.961, p=0.004), active participation in developing COVID-19 protocols (B=-1.619, S.E.=0.575, t=-2.815, p=0.005) and socialization with family (B=-2.108, S.E.=1.058, t=-1.993, p=0.048) were the most effective coping mechanisms for having lower levels of perceived stress.

Conclusions

Our study provided insights into the value of importance attributed to perceived stress and a series of coping strategies used by the respondents and their perception of value ascribed to the same series by their team members. Active participation both in family life and in professional environment proved to be protective in such a highly stressful time like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.