Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:34:53.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community resilience and associated factors in Fort McMurray a year after the devastating flood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

G. Obuobi-Donkor ,
E. Eboreime ,
R. Shalaby ,
B. Agyapong ,
M. Adu ,
E. Owusu ,
W. Mao  and
V. I. O. Agyapong
G. Obuobi-Donkor*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax
E. Eboreime
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
R. Shalaby
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
B. Agyapong
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
M. Adu
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax
E. Owusu
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
W. Mao
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
V. I. O. Agyapong
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

A natural disaster like flooding causes loss of properties and evacuation and effective mental health. Resilience after natural disasters is a crucial area of research which needs attention.

Objectives

To explore the prevalence and associated factors of low resilience a year after the 2020 floods in Fort McMurray.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Fort McMurray using online surveys. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25 using univariate analysis with the chi-squared test and binary logistic regression analysis.

Results

The prevalence of low resilience was 37.4%. Respondents under 25 years were nearly 26 times more likely to show low resilience (OR= 0.038; 95% CI 0.004 - 0.384). Responders with a history of depression and anxiety (OR= 0.212; CI 95% 0.068-0.661) were nearly four to five times more likely to show low resilience. Similarly, respondents willing to receive mental health counselling (OR=0.134 95%CI: 0.047-0.378) were 7.5 times more likely to show low resilience. Participants residing in the same house before the flood were almost 11 times more likely to show low resilience (OR=0.095; 95% CI 0.021- 0.427), and support from the Government of Alberta was a protective factor.

Conclusions

The study showed demographic, clinical, and flood-related variables contributing to low resilience. Receiving support from the Government was shown to be a protective factor against low resilience. More robust measures must be in place to promote normal to high resilience among flood victims in affected communities.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 66 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 31st European Congress of Psychiatry , March 2023 , pp. S989
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.