Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:09:40.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive correlates of mixed depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

A. Simonetti*
Affiliation:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Department Of Psychiatry, Rome, Italy
E. Bernardi
Affiliation:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Department Of Psychiatry, Rome, Italy
G. Bartolucci
Affiliation:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Department Of Psychiatry, Rome, Italy
O. Ferrara
Affiliation:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Department Of Psychiatry, Rome, Italy
S. Ruggiero
Affiliation:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Department Of Psychiatry, Rome, Italy
M. Di Nicola
Affiliation:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Department Of Psychiatry, Rome, Italy
D. Janiri
Affiliation:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Department Of Psychiatry, Rome, Italy
G. Sani
Affiliation:
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Department Of Psychiatry, Rome, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Mixed depressive states portend greater rates of impulsivity, attempted suicide, treatment resistance, and poorer outcome than non-mixed forms of depression. The neurocognitive bases of such affective states have not been defined yet.

Objectives

This work represents an attempt to clarify the neuropsychology underlying mixed depressive states.

Methods

Thirty subjects with affective disorders with mixed depression (MxD), 54 subjects with non-mixed depression (nonMxD), 73 euthymic subjects (Eu) and 93 healthy comparisons (HC) underwent a neurocognitive battery including the Trail-Making Test (TMT), the Controlled Word Fluency Test (WFT) and the Semantic Fluency Test (SFT), the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test RAVLT, the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test ROCFT, the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM), and the Interference Component of the Stroop Test (ST). Between-group differences were performed through multiple one-way analyses of variance. Post-hoc analyses were performed using Tukey post-hoc tests.

Results

HC performed better than the three patient groups in all the aforementioned neurocognitive tests. Eu performed better in RPM, TMT, SFT than nonMxD, and better on ST WCST than both nonMxD and MxD. MxD showed better performances in RPM, TMT-A, WCST than nonMxD, and more errors and less reaction times in the ST than nonMxD.

Conclusions

Mixed depressive states are characterized by enhanced attentional resources and greater set shifting abilities than non-mixed depressive states. On the other hand, they have less cognitive control than non-mixed depression. Such findings might explain some typical features observed in subjects with mixed depression, such impulsivity, suicidality, emotional reactivity and behavioral dyscontrol.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.