Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:44:31.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Care pathways for people with major depressive disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

R. Strawbridge*
Affiliation:
Institute Of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, Centre For Affective Disorders, London, United Kingdom
A. Young
Affiliation:
Institute Of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, Centre For Affective Disorders, London, United Kingdom
Major Depressive Disorder Working Group
Affiliation:
n/a, N/a, n/a, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, in part due to its high prevalence and high rates of comorbidities, recurrence, chronicity and treatment-resistance. These indicate that MDD is treated suboptimally despite a multitude of effective interventions and well-regarded best-practice treatment guidelines. To improve the management of MDD, the nature and extent of ‘gaps’ in care pathways need to be understood.

Objectives

We aimed to: 1. Identify ‘treatment gaps’ and patient needs along the care pathway, and determine the extent of these gaps (i.e. discrepancy between best- and current-practice). 2. Propose policy recommendation on how minimise treatment gaps for MDD.

Methods

Care pathway analysis: A set of relevant treatment gaps were agreed upon, a priori, based on gold-standard stepped-care guidelines. Data was gathered from a variety of sources in six countries (UK, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Hungary). Policy recommendations: To attain expert consensus on proposed recommendations, a modified-Delphi approach was undertaken with a multidisciplinary panel of experts across Europe.

Results

Taken together, data indicated that: ˜50% of episodes are undiagnosed, lifetime delay to treatment averages ˜4 years, ˜25-50% of patients are treated at any one time, ˜30-65% are followed up within 3 months of treatment, ˜5-25% can access psychiatric services. 28 specific recommendations to optimise pathways were made to enhance MDD detection (pathway entry), increase multimodal treatment, facilitate continuity of follow-up after treatment and increase access to specialist care.

Conclusions

There are concerning treatment gaps in depression care across Europe, from the proportion of people not being diagnosed to those stagnating in primary care with impairing, persistent illness.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.