Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:09:29.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brain imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Clinical Practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

Kasper Siegfried*
Affiliation:
Professor and Chair, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Tel.: +43.1.40.400.3568; fax: +43.1.40.400.3099 [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Based on the sound knowledge of clinical psychiatry neuroscientists embark since over 20 years to discover the biological bases of mental disorders. Whereas the “window to the brain” was firstly dominated by neuroendocrine and biochemical models, we now have the possibility to use sophisticated brain imaging techniques which span from electrophysiology to techniques derived from nuclear medicine. Furthermore, the combination of brain imaging techniques with genetic variables promises to have a close insight into brain-environment interactions. For treatment of psychiatric diseases, multidimensional criteria for selection of a psychotropic medication is necessary to not only judge the clinical phenotype but also the functional phenotype and finally the genotype. Whereas the clinical phenotype is characterized by psychiatric syndromes including psychiatric and somatic comorbidity, the functional phenotype can be uncovered with neuroendocrine measurements, sleep physiology, imaging techniques as well as proteomics. Finally, the genotype can be characterized by single nucleotid polymorphisms (SNP), coupling as well as the determination of candidate genes. Imaging genetics is a new way to achieve insight in the genetic variables of changes on a cellular level which thereafter influence information processing and finally are represented in complex functional interaction of human behavior. Based on this knowledge it is evident that psychiatrists not only should be determined to the clinical symptomatology of their patients but also on the underlying biological processes which can in turn be influenced to various degress with pharmacological as well as non-pharmacological treatment modalities, since the brain has a specified way to get better.

Type
Core Programme
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010

References

Kasper, S. den Boer, J.A. Sitsen, J.M.A. (eds.) (2003) Handbook of Depression and Anxiety Second edition, revised and expanded New York/Basel Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Kasper, S. Hirschfeld, R.M.A. (eds.) (2003) Handbook of Bipolar Disorder New York Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
Kasper, S. Papadimitriou, G. (eds.) (2003) Schizophrenia: Biopsychosocial Approaches and Current Challenges 2nd edition London Informa HealthcareGoogle Scholar
Kasper, S. Tauscher, J. Willeit, M. Stamenkovic, M. Neumeister, A. Küfferle, B. Barnas, C. Stastny, J. Praschak-Rieder, N. Pezawas, L. de Zwaan, M. Quiner, S. Pirker, W. Asenbaum, S. Podreka, I. Brücke, T. (2002) Receptor and transporter imaging-studies in schizophrenia, depression, bulimia, and Tourette's disorder. Implications for psychopharmacology. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 3: 133146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.