Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:06:06.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benchmarking Psychiatry in Europe and beyond: The European Board Exam of Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2024

Andrew Brittlebank
Affiliation:
Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes (UEMS) Section of Psychiatry, Brussels, Belgium
Livia De Picker
Affiliation:
SINAPS, University Psychiatric Hospital Campus Duffel, Duffel, Belgium Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Krzysztof Krysta
Affiliation:
Department and Clinic of Rehabilitation Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
Asilay Seker
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Ilaria Riboldi
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
Cecile Hanon
Affiliation:
Regional Resource Center of Old Age Psychiatry, AP-HP, Centre – University of Paris, Psychiatry and Addictology Department, Corentin-Celton Hospital, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France
George Alexandru Stercu
Affiliation:
Prof. Dr. Alexandru Obregia Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
Egor Chumakov
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Saint-Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia
Jerzy Samochowiec
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
Geert Dom
Affiliation:
Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium PC Multiversum, Boechout, Belgium European Psychiatric Association, Brussels, Belgium
Marisa Casanova Dias*
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK National Centre for Mental Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Section of Women’s Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
*
Corresponding author: Marisa Casanova Dias; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association

In 2021, the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), the Section of Psychiatry of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), and the European Federation of Psychiatric Trainees (EFPT) took the decisive step to formally join forces in collaborating toward the development and implementation of a European Board Exam of Psychiatry. The EPA (https://www.europsy.net/) is the main scientific organization representing national psychiatric associations in Europe. The UEMS (https://www.uemspsychiatry.org/) is the professional organization mandated with setting standards and educational accreditation authority within Europe. The EFPT (https://efpt.eu/) is the organization representing the consensus of psychiatric trainees’ associations across European countries.

Two reasons compel us to establish a European Board Exam of Psychiatry: first, to influence the learning outcomes of future psychiatric specialists, and second, to harmonize professional standards across Europe. Both outcomes are necessary to ensure high-quality mental healthcare. As Schuwirth and van der Vleuten observed, “students do what you inspect,” in other words, what is learned is determined by what and how the subject is assessed [Reference Schuwirth, van der Vleuten, Swanwick, Forrest and O’Brien1]. Because psychiatry is a deeply clinical specialty, it must be recognized that a written knowledge examination cannot possibly assess all that is required of a psychiatrist. Nonetheless, it sets a foundational benchmark for aspiring specialists. Furthermore, the harmonization of medical education and training is critical for ensuring high-quality healthcare and facilitating the mobility of healthcare professionals within Europe. This does not imply that training programs should be equal, ignoring local and cultural distinctions. Instead, harmonization seeks to establish a strong base of fundamental training prerequisites, allowing for the addition of country-specific aspects, and leveling up training standards. European Board Exams are central to this objective, establishing benchmarks for the required knowledge, skills, and competencies of medical professionals that complement the national evaluation procedures. In Europe, there are UEMS exams in 34 medical specialty fields. Existing European Board Exams in ophthalmology [Reference Aclimandos, Mathysen, Creuzot-Garcher and Sunaric-Mégevand2], anesthesiology [Reference Brogly, Engelhardt, Hill, Ringvold, Varosyan and Varvinskiy3], radiology [4], and gastroenterology [Reference Beattie, Greff, Lamy and Mallinson5] managed by the UEMS have demonstrated the value of a structured examination framework that integrates theoretical and practical skill assessments. The Board Exam of Psychiatry will benefit from these precedents, adopting best practices in examination content, fairness, and delivery technologies, while also addressing European diversity and maintaining examination integrity.

Accordingly, an Exam Program Board, representing the leadership of the three acting associations, was created and tasked with overseeing the project’s coordination. A structured timeline was established, targeting the first exam at the beginning of 2025 (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Workflow and timeline of the European Psychiatry Board Exam.

This process built upon the experiences of other medical specialty fields, where cooperation between European scientific associations and the UEMS, has proven successful. A unique feature of the Board Exam of Psychiatry is the inclusion of diverse stakeholder perspectives from its inception, particularly from groups directly impacted by the exam, such as psychiatric trainees and early career psychiatrists through the representation of these groups in the Exam Program Board by the EFPT and the EPA Early Career Psychiatrists’ Committee (ECPC). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a European Board Exam where the potential exam takers actively participate in its organization, ensuring careful consideration of their needs.

As part of the initial stakeholder input, the EFPT and the EPA ECPC collaboratively collected qualitative feedback from over 400 psychiatric trainees and early career psychiatrists from 40 European countries on their views, attitudes, and expectations regarding the Board Exam of Psychiatry. This feedback, analyzed through Thematic Analysis, overwhelmingly supported the creation of the examination and informed stages of its development. Specific themes and subthemes that emerged are summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Thematic analysis of the qualitative feedback of trainees and early career psychiatrists on a Board Exam of Psychiatry. EBEoP, European Board Exam of Psychiatry; *, Themes; **, Subthemes.

A knowledge exam requires a comprehensive content base (i.e., a syllabus). The Board Exam of Psychiatry’s syllabus is based on the revised UEMS European Training Requirements (ETR) approved in 2023 [6], and encompasses basic and advanced training needs and competencies framed within the CanMEDS model [Reference Frank, Snell and Sherbino7]. Additional content expertise is provided by the EPA Sections and external specialists, with educational oversight by the UEMS Section on Psychiatry and the EPA Committee on Education. Financially, the EPA and UEMS have committed to supporting the initial implementation for two consecutive exams (2025 and 2026), with the goal of achieving financial sustainability through future examination revenues.

Scheduled to commence in 2025, the examination will be a knowledge-based test, in written format, conducted online, in English, and under strict proctoring to ensure its integrity and fairness. This is a voluntary, supplemental examination that can be taken by candidates who hold a Primary Medical Qualification and have experience of Postgraduate Training in Psychiatry. Successful qualification indicates to National Medical Regulators and to potential employers that, on the date of the examination, the exam taker possessed sufficient knowledge of psychiatry according to UEMS criteria to practice as a specialist psychiatrist in Europe. It does not indicate that the holder possesses the necessary skills or behaviors required of a specialist psychiatrist. These attributes must be demonstrated by other means. Further details on the exam and eligibility criteria will be communicated through the channels of EPA, UEMS, and EFPT.

In summary, we successfully leveraged the lessons learned from existing board exams to inform the development and implementation of the first European Board Exam of Psychiatry. This collaborative effort exemplifies a significant advancement in European psychiatric education and sets a precedent for future joint endeavors and medical specialty examinations.

Competing interest

A.B. is the Immediate Past President of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) Section of Psychiatry, K.K. is the Vice President for Training, and M.C.D. is the President. G.D. is the President of the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) and L.D.P., C.H., and J.S. are board members. C.H. is the Chair of the EPA Committee on Education and G.S. is a committee member. E.C. is co-chair of the Early Career Psychiatrists Committee of EPA and A.S. is a committee member. A.S. is a Past President of the European Federation of Psychiatric Trainees (EFPT). The remaining authors declare none.

Footnotes

A.B. and L.D.P. are joint first authors. G.D. and M.C.D. are joint senior authors.

References

Schuwirth, LWT, van der Vleuten, CPM. How to design a useful test. In: Swanwick, T, Forrest, K, O’Brien, BC, editors. Understanding medical education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018, p. 275–89. doi:10.1002/9781119373780.ch20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aclimandos, W, Mathysen, DG, Creuzot-Garcher, C, Sunaric-Mégevand, G. Introduction of subspecialty examinations by the European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) in close collaboration with European subspecialty ophthalmological societies: FEBO-SA. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(8):778–81. doi:10.1111/aos.12738CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brogly, N, Engelhardt, W, Hill, S, Ringvold, EM, Varosyan, A, Varvinskiy, A, et al. European diploma in anaesthesiology and intensive Care in Spain: Results for the part 1 and part 2 exams in the last five years. Are we going in the right direction?. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2019;66(4):206–12. doi:10.1016/j.redar.2018.12.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Board of Radiology (EBR). The European diploma in radiology (EDiR): Investing in the future of the new generations of radiologists. Insights Imaging. 2018;9(6):905–9. doi:10.1007/s13244-018-0665-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, AD, Greff, M, Lamy, V, Mallinson, CN. The European diploma of gastroenterology: Progress towards harmonization of standards. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;8(4):403–6. doi:10.1097/00042737-199604000-00021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) Section of Psychiatry. Training requirements for the speciality of psychiatry, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/60bcce6f16d6b011fa363469/t/65be9f460ba5792db96b9024/1706991431577/ETR2022+%28compiled%29+.pdf; 2022 [accessed 10 March 2024].Google Scholar
Frank, JR, Snell, L, Sherbino, J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015, https://canmeds.royalcollege.ca/uploads/en/framework/CanMEDS%202015%20Framework_EN_Reduced.pdf [accessed 10 March 2024].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Workflow and timeline of the European Psychiatry Board Exam.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Thematic analysis of the qualitative feedback of trainees and early career psychiatrists on a Board Exam of Psychiatry. EBEoP, European Board Exam of Psychiatry; *, Themes; **, Subthemes.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.