Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:53:25.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AS09-05 - the Importance of the Concept of Self-relatedness for Neuroscience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

G. Glas*
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Building forth on earlier work in which I have argued for the self-relational nature of human psychopathology, this presentation will investigate whether self-relatedness is also fundamental for the study of the neuronal mechanisms that underlie human psychopathology.

Self-relatedness refers to the self-referential structure of human experience and action. It is concept with some philosophical importance, because it helps to avoid an unattractive instrumentalist (and ultimately Cartesian) view of the brain, in which the brain is either seen as the executive organ of a hidden player (the ego) (dualism) or as the engine of the complicated machinery we call man (materialistic monism). It will be shown how self-relatedness is implied at two levels of investigation in neuroscience:

  1. (1) The level of first order attitudes and experiences such as basis moods, affective dispositions and body memory; and

  2. (2) The level of second order processes that are implied in (self) regulation, integration and insight.

To support this hypothesis I will build forth on the work of neuroscientists and philosophers like Damasio, Edelman, Thompson, Noë, Jack & Roepstorff. Differences and similarities between the concepts of self-relatedness and of self-organization will be pointed out.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.