No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2020
To find out the dynamic peculiarities of the formation of non-psychotic (neurotic) disturbances after brain damage, and how non-organic factors conduce to their development.
124 patients with non-psychotic disturbances after brain damage were examined (mean age-35.7±1.11, mean duration-6.23±0.57) by dynamic clinical-psychopathological method. Using specially designed questionnaires the social-psychological states of the patients were assessed. They also completed SCL-90.
The patients distributed into 3 groups according to psychopathological analysis of the neurotic syndromes. 31 of them developed asthenic-depressive disturbances (G1), 57–personality changes (G2), 36-hypochondriacal disturbances(G3). The number of patients after brain trauma in G3 was lower than in G1 (p<0.01) and G2 (p<0.001). After intoxications the number of patients in G3 was higher, than in G1 (p<0.05) and G2 (p<0.001). Significant differences were found by the burdened familial history of mental disorders and premorbid constitutional accentuations of personality between G1 and G3 (p<0.05). 51 patients of the G2 (89.5%) were affected by severe psychogenic factors, but only 10 patients in G1 (32.2%) and 8 patients in G3 (22.2%) had the same influences. So the number of distressed patients in the G2 was higher than in G1 (p<0.001) and G3 (p<0.001). The Hostility by SCL-90 is higher in G2, than in G1 (p<0.05) and G3 (p<0.001).
There is certainly interplay of organic and non-organic factors in the genesis of non-psychotic disturbances after brain damage. The hereditary, constitutional and psychogenic factors are of great importance in the typological formation of the neurotic syndromes after brain damage.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.